| |
Ubuntu Lite |
2009/6/30 C David Rigby <c.david.ri...@gmail.com>: Of an OS, remember, that is only at about 1% of the desktop market - a We need simpler, not more complex. --
> will not really be "lite". That's OK.
OpenOffice & (arguably) Firefox?
> is not yet "Windowfied", like GNOME and KDE are becoming.
of the Windows one - closer than either GNOME or KDE 4.
> simply a change of DE, then I don't see a conflict with U-lite's mission
> of providing a lighter alternative for resource-limited hardware.
odd random punter to know the difference.
> "bundles"-oriented installer on the lubuntu mailing list.
> my though is to create a minimal command-line with networking
> installation with LXDE and its minimal dependencies on top. The user of
> the installation program would then select well-documented bundles of
> additional applications for installation to create the desired system.
> The effort would be on the installer, mostly.
are few options with the Mac OS X installation and almost none with
Windows 7. Complex installers are a bad memory of the 1990s. The ideal
is, give your name and where to put it and that's it. I think an
interactive installer that asks questions will put off all but experts
and result in very poor adoption.
quarter of the share of the Mac. That's *all* forms of Linux put
together.
Liam Proven • Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/liamproven
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk • GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lpro...@gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884 • Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AOL/AIM/iChat/Yahoo/Skype: liamproven • LiveJournal/Twitter: lproven
MSN: lpro...@hotmail.com • ICQ: 73187508