Message from discussion
Mars Effect for TV personalities
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.91.18 with SMTP id o18mr248935anb.29.1244924951892; Sat,
13 Jun 2009 13:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <a7df8026-a793-46b2-9cd0-84ffa5aacb7e@w35g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
X-IP: 220.244.225.153
References: <203452.95274.qm@web26902.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <a7df8026-a793-46b2-9cd0-84ffa5aacb7e@w35g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.5)
Gecko/2008120122 Firefox/3.0.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <4cdcc634-917b-48b6-8793-b2dac30bb856@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Mars Effect for TV personalities
From: Ray Murphy <raymu...@tpg.com.au>
To: Tropical Astrology Research <tropical-astrology-research@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> There's no question that impressive looking =A0trends come and go, but
> in astrological research we have a history of not even looking for
> them. We have been mostly looking at static graphs that sometimes
> don't even have a trend in them. Often we are only looking at a short-
> term spike that raised the overall score for a particular factor.
>
> If anyone had been seriously looking for trends they would have
> noticed that the Mars Effect for Sportsmen didn't even exist after the
> first 73 years of the data. It came and it completely fizzled out by
> 16th Feb 1890.
[Extra]
I've just now had a look at the Scientists data and noticed that
Saturn in Sectors 1 and 4 had fizzled out after 33 years (and 405
samples) by 15th May 1828 and then the trend built up and stayed for
the next 90 years to 1918, when the data finished.
Ray
|
