|
|
Tropical Astrology Research |
Here is a description of the project at Astrodatabank's website:
Here is a graph which shows the distribution of those very wide
The peak in the graph was so high that I wondered if it was just
RM: To answer your question above: Yes, some time ago I checked much
If the phenomena is real, it may have something to do with being
Such an exercise could involve tagging astrologers in several ways, so
This is a good topic - how many ways could be reasonably label most
Ray
Axel wrote:
RM: I don't know of any way to change the automatic dropping-out of
> Ray, I wanted to bump up the thread on the 93 eminent astrologers but
> the "Reply" button seems to vanish from all threads after 20 or 21
> days. Is this a setting you can change? In some forums a thread can
> lie dormant for a couple of years and suddenly become hot again. Also
> we are a very small group, so there is not the kind of traffic that
> will keep threads alive for a long time.
active threads, so I'll copy/paste the original message below.
> Anyway, I wondered if you had checked the big astrologers' list for
==========
> the same factor (Moon-Sun arc). Eyeballing the numbers in the Taurus-
> Aquarius thread, I figure there must be over 1500 astrologers in ADB.
[In January I wrote]:
Astrodatabank conducted a small project to see if an "astrological
signature" could be found amongst the factors of 100
prominentastrologers. After seeing the results I wanted to run the
data through one of my programs to check a few things but I was not
able to acquire all of it because it came from ADB version 4 but I
only have ADB version 3, which has only 93 of the 100 astrologers in
it, however even with the reduced amount of data I noticed a very
strong bunching of MOO 30 SUN aspects with a very wide orb of 15
degrees. It was double the theoretical mean rate for Moon-Sun aspects
and 1 in 3 of the astrologers had it.
http://www.astrodatabank.com/AS/ASAstrologyOfAstrologers.htm
aspects. It has been uploaded to the Files section in this
group:
http://tropical-astrology-research.googlegroups.com/web/93%20astrolog...
chance at play or whether researchers can unknowingly select data that
has certain similarities.
==========
larger batches of astrologers listed in Astrodatabank -- both the full
set and a smaller set of names that I recognised as being dedicated to
the art, but from memory I don't think the Sun-Moon angular separation
in the data showed a similar trend, however it's something I'll be
keeping in mind because there may well be a Sun-Moon phase thing
working for a particular type of astrologer - but how would we
identify them?
dedicated AND prominent, like the 100 who were selected by the ADB
researcher (of which I used only 93). I suppose if we could tag a
large batch of astrologers under various categories, I could run them
all through one of the special programs I wrote where batches can be
compared simultaneously.
they wouldn't HAVE to necessarily fit in a particular category. For
example we could have an astrologer tagged as "prominent" but not
necessarily any good at extracting useful information from charts.
astrologers?