Graham Douglas <ondastropic...@yahoo.co.uk>

Hi Ray,
               I notice you say sector 1, what about sector 4 ? Maybe when you've done all of them you can show us the figures for the whole distribution. Bear in mind that Astrodatabank is well known for errors in the data.
               How does jupiter turn out, and the other planets ? Gauquelin found a strong mars effect in businessmen too.
            Regards,
               Graham.
PS: in case you are interested in the current situation with Correlation you can hav e a look at http://cura.free.fr , and also my notes on the Forum under the coldbaby thread.
   
                  

--- On Sat, 13/6/09, Ray Murphy <raymu...@tpg.com.au> wrote:

From: Ray Murphy <raymu...@tpg.com.au>
Subject: Mars Effect for TV personalities
To: "Tropical Astrology Research" <tropical-astrology-research@googlegroups.com>
Date: Saturday, 13 June, 2009, 2:05 AM

Hi All,

I don't know what to make of some of the Gauquelin observations after
processing a lot more data recently, but for those who have any
interest in the 'Mars Effect' (in its original sense as it related to
the category of Sportsmen) there is something new to keep an eye on,
and it doesn't require any searching for famous sportsmen or women or
deciding if they are famous enough.

I found yesterday in Astrodatabank data that TV personalities are much
more likely to have Mars in Sector 1 than sportsmen - 42% more when
the same amount of data (327 in birth sequence) was compared. The
trend has been consistent all along - apart from the volatility that
is always present with small amounts of data for the earliest scores.

Ray