Hi Ray, Did you run a control on this over the same period ? Mars has been peaking in the region between Cancer and Libra for a long time. Regards, Graham.
On Apr 21, 8:49 pm, Graham Douglas <ondastropic...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Ray,
> Did you run a control on this over the same period ? Mars has been peaking in the region between Cancer and Libra for a long time.
> Regards,
> Graham.
RM: I replied a few hours ago but the message has not appeared. I'll
wait a bit longer.
On 21 Apr, 20:49, Graham Douglas <ondastropic...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Ray,
> Did you run a control on this over the same period ? Mars has been peaking in the region between Cancer and Libra for a long time.
> Regards,
> Graham.
RM: We certainly need to compensate for Mars being on that side of the
zodiac more often (roughly about 140% more in Leo than in Aries) but
I can't think of a decent way to make a control group. If we used the
conventional system of duplicating the years to generate a control
group we would merely be duplicating the Mars signs and producing a
very flakey control group.
I suppose the nearest thing to a decent control group would be to use
a factor of 1.4 on the Aries scores to compensate for the natural
distribution of Mars in the signs for that whole 200 year period,
which would put a "normalized" Aries graph-line roughly at the half
way point between the current 2 lines for Leo and Aries.
> On 21 Apr, 20:49, Graham Douglas <ondastropic...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > Hi Ray,
> > Did you run a control on this over the same period ? Mars has been peaking in the region between Cancer and Libra for a long time.
> > Regards,
> > Graham.
> RM: We certainly need to compensate for Mars being on that side of the
> zodiac more often (roughly about 140% more in Leo than in Aries) but
> I can't think of a decent way to make a control group. If we used the
> conventional system of duplicating the years to generate a control
> group we would merely be duplicating the Mars signs and producing a
> very flakey control group.
> I suppose the nearest thing to a decent control group would be to use
> a factor of 1.4 on the Aries scores to compensate for the natural
> distribution of Mars in the signs for that whole 200 year period,
> which would put a "normalized" Aries graph-line roughly at the half
> way point between the current 2 lines for Leo and Aries.
|
