Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Feds' medical pot challenge tossed
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 71 - Collapse all   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
M_P  
View profile
 More options Aug 23, 1:02 am
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
From: M_P <m...@rocketmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Aug 23 2008 1:02 am
Subject: Feds' medical pot challenge tossed
http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/localnews/ci_10273502

Jennifer Squires - Sentinel Staff Writer
Article Launched: 08/22/2008 01:31:44 AM PDT

A federal court ruling handed down Wednesday has lifted the hopes of
medical marijuana users by denying a Bush administration request to
toss a lawsuit brought by Santa Cruz city and county officials and Wo/
Men's Alliance for Medical Marijuana members.

WAMM co-founder Valerie Corral called the ruling "hopeful." WAMM had
its medical marijuana seized by federal agents in a 2002 raid.

"Our lawsuit is really much more of an appeal than a lawsuit. It's an
appeal for mercy from the federal government," Corral said. "We're not
asking to break the law. We're asking to have another avenue for
relief."

The plaintiffs in the case contend that the federal government is
deliberately interfering with how the state makes the distinction
between legal and illegal marijuana use: the recommendation of a state-
licensed physician to recommend medical marijuana to a sick patient.
The plaintiffs say the federal government is seeking to disrupt
California's medical marijuana law by targeting doctors who approve
their patients' medical marijuana use and local governments that issue
state-approved medical pot cards, among other things. That, the
plaintiffs say, interferes with California's Constitutional right to
make its own laws.

U.S. District Court Judge Jeremy Fogel ruled Wednesday that that
portion of the case can go forward because if the plaintiffs prove
their claims "they may be able to show that the federal government
deliberately is seeking to frustrate the state's ability to determine
whether an individual's use of marijuana is permissible under
California law."

"The federal government can enforce its own laws but it can't tell the
states what laws they can enact," said Graham Boyd, an American Civil
Liberties Union attorney representing WAMM. "If they can't do that,
they also can't use their law enforcement to sabotage the state laws
they don't like."

California voters in 1996 approved Proposition 215, which gave ill
people with a doctor's recommendation the right to use marijuana as a
medication. In the years since, federal drug agents have targeted
medicinal marijuana dispensaries and the doctors who prescribe
marijuana.

"Those steps all make it impossible for California and its government
to enforce state laws," Boyd said.

Past lawsuits filed against the federal government have reached the
Supreme Court, but all have failed.

Boyd called this case "novel," explaining that the core claim by the
plaintiffs is that it's chosen to make marijuana illegal for everyone
except for patients and that it has set up mechanisms to distinguish
the two, such as requiring a prescription from a doctor.

"It's an unusual legal claim," Boyd said.

He said he expects the federal government will appeal the ruling, but
that it could also lead to a change in federal drug enforcement
efforts.

Copyright © 2008 - Santa Cruz Sentinel


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Adam Whyte-Settlar  
View profile
 More options Aug 23, 1:12 am
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
From: "Adam Whyte-Settlar" <ador@ble>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 01:12:21 +1000
Local: Sat, Aug 23 2008 1:12 am
Subject: Re: Feds' medical pot challenge tossed

"M_P" <m...@rocketmail.com> wrote in message

news:faef6988-a50e-4dc5-82b9-84cd64687506@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/localnews/ci_10273502

Jennifer Squires - Sentinel Staff Writer
Article Launched: 08/22/2008 01:31:44 AM PDT

A federal court ruling handed down Wednesday has lifted the hopes of
medical marijuana users by denying a Bush administration request to
toss a lawsuit brought by Santa Cruz city and county officials and Wo/
Men's Alliance for Medical Marijuana members.

The whole thing is a sick farce anyway.
There must be a billion people who use pot around the world (42% of New
Zealander's just for one example) and it's never done anyone any harm -
despite the desperate efforts of the brewing and distilling industries to
prove otherwise for nigh on 70 years now.

It's a wonder drug right up there with Aspirin (only much much less
dangerous) and these tossers perpetuate this exercise in futility trying to
eradicate it.  The only difference it being illegal in some countries makes
is to earn billions of dollars for various criminal mafiosi around the world
and to keep the price up.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
M_P  
View profile
 More options Aug 23, 1:58 am
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
From: M_P <m...@rocketmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Aug 23 2008 1:58 am
Subject: Re: Feds' medical pot challenge tossed
On Aug 22, 10:12 am, "Adam Whyte-Settlar" <ador@ble> wrote:
> "M_P" <m...@rocketmail.com> wrote in message

news:faef6988-
a50e-4dc5-82b9-84cd64687...@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...http://
www.santacruzsentinel.com/localnews/ci_10273502

> Jennifer Squires - Sentinel Staff Writer
> Article Launched: 08/22/2008 01:31:44 AM PDT

> A federal court ruling handed down Wednesday has lifted the hopes of
> medical marijuana users by denying a Bush administration request to
> toss a lawsuit brought by Santa Cruz city and county officials and Wo/
> Men's Alliance for Medical Marijuana members.

> The whole thing is a sick farce anyway.
> There must be a billion people who use pot around the world (42% of New
> Zealander's just for one example) and it's never done anyone any harm -

Well, now, that's an exaggeration. I believe bronchitis is an
established harm of pot smoking.

> despite the desperate efforts of the brewing and distilling industries to
> prove otherwise for nigh on 70 years now.

Pot has certainly done less harm than alcohol.

> It's a wonder drug right up there with Aspirin (only much much less
> dangerous) and these tossers perpetuate this exercise in futility trying to
> eradicate it.  The only difference it being illegal in some countries makes
> is to earn billions of dollars for various criminal mafiosi around the world
> and to keep the price up.

One does wonder why some are so eager to inflate criminal profits.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
klunk  
View profile
 More options Aug 23, 2:15 am
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
From: "klunk" <kl...@theothershoo.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:15:47 GMT
Local: Sat, Aug 23 2008 2:15 am
Subject: Re: Feds' medical pot challenge tossed

"M_P" <m...@rocketmail.com> wrote in message

news:bf13af3d-0720-4c6d-90cb-72763d068ee7@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

then you believe incorrectly... vapourisers completely eliminate the toxic
effects of burning...


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dennis Kemmerer  
View profile
 More options Aug 23, 2:30 am
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
From: "Dennis Kemmerer" <d...@suespammers.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:30:06 -0700
Local: Sat, Aug 23 2008 2:30 am
Subject: Re: Feds' medical pot challenge tossed
"M_P" <m...@rocketmail.com> wrote in message

news:bf13af3d-0720-4c6d-90cb-72763d068ee7@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

So when will we see you fighting to criminalize tobacco?

[snip]


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
M_P  
View profile
 More options Aug 23, 3:45 am
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
From: M_P <m...@rocketmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Aug 23 2008 3:45 am
Subject: Re: Feds' medical pot challenge tossed
On Aug 22, 11:15 am, "klunk" <kl...@theothershoo.org> wrote:
> "M_P" <m...@rocketmail.com> wrote in message

news:bf13af3d-0720-4c6d-90cb-72763d068ee7@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

I'm not sure that using a vaporizer qualifies as "smoking" ... but to
avoid a semantic squabble, I'll rephrase: I believe bronchitis is an
established harm of pot smoking via burning.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
M_P  
View profile
 More options Aug 23, 3:45 am
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
From: M_P <m...@rocketmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Aug 23 2008 3:45 am
Subject: Re: Feds' medical pot challenge tossed
On Aug 22, 11:30 am, "Dennis Kemmerer" <d...@suespammers.org> wrote:

You won't ... I hold that harms people inflict on themselves are none
of government's business.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
klunk  
View profile
 More options Aug 23, 4:02 am
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
From: "klunk" <kl...@theothershoo.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:02:17 GMT
Local: Sat, Aug 23 2008 4:02 am
Subject: Re: Feds' medical pot challenge tossed

"M_P" <m...@rocketmail.com> wrote in message

news:ab46f9b2-2c31-4590-a2c8-9cacc0f78407@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

the same could be said of smoking banana peels via burning.... ;-)

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Pete nospam Zakel  
View profile
 More options Aug 23, 5:36 am
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
From: px...@cadence.com (Pete nospam Zakel)
Date: 22 Aug 2008 11:36:26 -0800
Local: Sat, Aug 23 2008 5:36 am
Subject: Re: Feds' medical pot challenge tossed

In article <i4GdnQ9LpZHASjPVnZ2dneKdnZydn...@westnet.com.au> "Adam Whyte-Settlar" <ador@ble> writes:
>The whole thing is a sick farce anyway.
>There must be a billion people who use pot around the world (42% of New
>Zealander's just for one example) and it's never done anyone any harm -

I disagree that cannabis has "never done anyone any harm".  Just like any
substance that is taken into the body, some people's bodies will react
negatively.

Smoking cannabis does cause bronchitis.  That is harm.  Minor harm, when
compared to what drinking alcohol or smoking tobacco or taking aspirin
causes, but harm nonetheless.  Also, there is some evidence that daily
cannabis use by those with Hepatitis C can accelerate liver damage.

However, as far as can be established, use of marijuana has never directly
caused anyone to die.  That is totally counter to almost any other substance,
including "safe" substances like aspirin or even water (which can cause "water
intoxication" and even death if over-consumed).

Also, even though it would seem that smoke in the lungs should cause cancer,
cannabis-only smokers don't get cancer at higher rates than non-smokers.

>despite the desperate efforts of the brewing and distilling industries to
>prove otherwise for nigh on 70 years now.
>It's a wonder drug right up there with Aspirin (only much much less
>dangerous) and these tossers perpetuate this exercise in futility trying to
>eradicate it.  The only difference it being illegal in some countries makes
>is to earn billions of dollars for various criminal mafiosi around the world
>and to keep the price up.

Exactly.  Cannabis should be as legal as any current OTC medication.  It
should be at *least* as legal as beer or cigarettes.

-Pete Zakel
 (p...@seeheader.nospam)

"I make no bones about my personal view that the best course of action for us
 to take is exactly the same course of action we took after Prohibition, and
 that is decriminalization."
                                -Federal Judge Vaughn R. Walker, 1 Mar 1994
                                 (Walker was nominated by President Reagan)


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
M_P  
View profile
 More options Aug 23, 5:06 am
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa
From: M_P <m...@rocketmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Aug 23 2008 5:06 am
Subject: Re: Feds' medical pot challenge tossed
On Aug 22, 1:02 pm, "klunk" <kl...@theothershoo.org> wrote:

Yes, and if I ever see a post saying smoking banana peels via burning
has "never done anyone any harm" I'll bring that to the poster's
attention.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must