Postman orders review of ACMD
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet. Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, uk.legal, uk.politics.drugs
From: John Watson <drj...@NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com>Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:40:08 +0000
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 1:40 am
Subject: Postman orders review of ACMD
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, uk.legal, uk.politics.drugs
From: "Mr X" <inva...@invalid.com>Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:52:44 -0000
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 1:52 am
Subject: Re: Postman orders review of ACMD
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, uk.legal, uk.politics.drugs
From: Jethro <jethro...@hotmail.com>Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 07:05:15 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 2:05 am
Subject: Re: Postman orders review of ACMD
On 2 Nov, 14:40, John Watson <drj ...@NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com> wrote: Well, since the role of the ACMD is laid out in the 1971 Misuse of Drugs Act, his review can say what he likes. It would take an act of parliament to affect the ACMD.
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, uk.legal, uk.politics.drugs
From: John Watson <drj...@NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com>Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:21:18 +0000
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 2:21 am
Subject: Re: Postman orders review of ACMD
Noticed at Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:05:15 -0800: Jethro informed us: > On 2 Nov, 14:40, John Watson <drj ...@NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com> wrote: >> No doubt to fill it with yes men and stamp, sorry, arse, lickers. >> http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/nov/02/drugspolicy-drugshttp:...
>> --
>> John Watson
>> London
> Well, since the role of the ACMD is laid out in the 1971 Misuse of Drugs
> Act, his review can say what he likes.
> It would take an act of parliament to affect the ACMD.
Indeed, but who appoints the members? --
John Watson
London
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, uk.legal, uk.politics.drugs
From: Jethro <jethro...@hotmail.com>Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 07:33:33 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 2:33 am
Subject: Re: Postman orders review of ACMD
On 2 Nov, 15:21, John Watson <drj ...@NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com> wrote:
> Noticed at Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:05:15 -0800: Jethro informed us: > > On 2 Nov, 14:40, John Watson <drj...@NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com> wrote:
> >> No doubt to fill it with yes men and stamp, sorry, arse, lickers.
> >>http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/nov/02/drugspolicy-drugshttp:...
> >> --
> >> John Watson
> >> London
> > Well, since the role of the ACMD is laid out in the 1971 Misuse of Drugs
> > Act, his review can say what he likes.
> > It would take an act of parliament to affect the ACMD.
> Indeed, but who appoints the members?
Who cares ? It's not as if anyone listens to them ....
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, uk.legal, uk.politics.drugs
From: Vicko Zoomba <vicko_zoo...@hotmail.com>Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 08:37:19 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 3:37 am
Subject: Re: Postman orders review of ACMD
On 2 Nov, 14:52, "Mr X" <inva ...@invalid.com> wrote: It's looking that way. Another 2 have stood down and lets face - would you do that job now? McKevvy
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs, uk.legal, uk.politics.drugs
From: John Watson <drj...@NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com>Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:56:47 +0000
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 3:56 am
Subject: Re: Postman orders review of ACMD
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
|
|
