|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: soc.singles.moderated
From: kmd <k...@lifeofaction.org>
Date: 31 Dec 2005 09:17:38 -0500
Local: Sun, Jan 1 2006 1:17 am
Subject: Re: Writing Style (was Re: Internal spying within the US)
On 30 Dec 2005 16:59:31 -0500, a...@pobox.com (Mean Green Dancing
Machine) wrote: <snip> >In article <075br19gj9pb9l17du6v7ps99ibfics...@4ax.com>, >kmd <k...@lifeofaction.org> wrote: >>On 30 Dec 2005 10:45:00 -0500, a...@pobox.com (Mean Green Dancing >>Machine) wrote: >But my Kinda like low GPAs from genuises. PRotFU had the same vow, never get >essential worldview has changed not at all, only how I think about it. >For example, I once swore I'd never get involved with a smoker, yet I >celebrated my tenth anniversary with one last October. (No, not the >ProblemOlderWoman for those of you having trouble with dates.) OTOH, >I've never ever seen zir smoking, and zie doesn't have the icky smoker >smell I usually encounter. My basic policy still stands; I've just made >an exception for an unusual circumstance. involved with a smoker. And yet he was astonishingly gracious and supportive during the first four years of our relationship as I continued to smoke. I smoked outside or next to an open door, so our house wasn't stinky. But I still always felt like my breath was like an ashtray. One failed attempt the first year, then three years later I quit. That was over three years ago. Phew. And always support, always encouragement, never a single angry complaint from the man who swore he'd never get involved with a smoker. >>>and I'm less likely to get sucked into Got to my newsfeed several hours after this one did. >>>interminable point/counterpoint discussions where it's apparent that the >>>other party isn't paying any attention to what I'm saying. >>Is that a comment on the exchange between you and me that you snipped >Nope. I'm not much of one for hidden messages. I did respond to the >>>I doubt Wow. Well, I see all kinds of glaring immaturities and chasms of >>>anyone could find style changes that identify when I was writing. >>Not even you? >Not really. Many's the time I've come across an old post from the early barely-masked loneliness in my old stuff. OTOH, sometimes I read something from 7 or 8 years ago and it tickles me pink. Feisty and funny. -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||