<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if</id>
  <title type="text">soc.history.what-if Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Alternate history.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/soc.history.what-if/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="soc.history.what-if feed"/>
  <updated>2008-11-22T09:23:23Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com.au" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>David Tenner</name>
  <email>dten...@ameritech.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-22T09:23:23Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/2b651203e96157c5/5fe9dd3441cc415b?show_docid=5fe9dd3441cc415b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/2b651203e96157c5/5fe9dd3441cc415b?show_docid=5fe9dd3441cc415b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Maine-Nebraska in 1860</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  rich...@gadsden.name (Richard Gadsden) wrote in &lt;br&gt; Actually, he would get one electoral vote in a slave state--the St. Louis &lt;br&gt; district in Missouri which sent Frank Blair, Jr. to Congress. &lt;br&gt; I agree though that he would lose some electoral votes to Douglas in &lt;br&gt; Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio, also to &amp;quot;fusion&amp;quot; tickets in New York (that&#39;s
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>nexous</name>
  <email>nexous1...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-22T09:17:29Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/faecc5d1e301998e/e9e6cb57f3a1804b?show_docid=e9e6cb57f3a1804b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/faecc5d1e301998e/e9e6cb57f3a1804b?show_docid=e9e6cb57f3a1804b"/>
  <title type="text">Free India Classified Website</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Free Jobs Post, Job search, For Sell,Real Estate,Home services, &lt;br&gt; Automobiles, Miscellaneous, Matrimonial, Music &amp;amp; Entertainment, &lt;br&gt; Business Opportunities etc. &lt;br&gt; Hot Deals and Online Coupons &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.wowmycash.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Free India Classified Website &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.babooli.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>David Tenner</name>
  <email>dten...@ameritech.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-22T08:05:44Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/10bf68a77e4f9daa/f1713e4ff356a1ba?show_docid=f1713e4ff356a1ba</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/10bf68a77e4f9daa/f1713e4ff356a1ba?show_docid=f1713e4ff356a1ba"/>
  <title type="text">Re: FDR in 1924?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;quot;Graham Truesdale&amp;quot; &amp;lt;graham.truesd...@tiscali.nosp am.com&amp;gt; wrote in &lt;br&gt; It does seem to me though that in 1932 the Democrats were especially &lt;br&gt; determined not to nominate anyone (e.g., Al Smith) who had been too closely &lt;br&gt; associated with the party&#39;s electoral defeats during the 1920&#39;s. And &lt;br&gt; remember that FDR in this ATL would have been involved in *two* of those
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Phil McGregor</name>
  <email>asp...@pacific.net.au</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-22T07:09:27Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/26c7a9861882da6c/7214da90fad0d5a9?show_docid=7214da90fad0d5a9</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/26c7a9861882da6c/7214da90fad0d5a9?show_docid=7214da90fad0d5a9"/>
  <title type="text">Re: What IF: Japan had also attacked the Panama Canal on Dec.7&#39;41 ?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:53:57 -0800 (PST), dabrob &amp;lt;dab...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Because we are all against animal cruelty? &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Ban the shipping of Japanese Monkey in Barrels!&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; ***** FLASH ***** &lt;br&gt; Monkey Business &lt;br&gt; =============== &lt;br&gt; New York Times, Monday, 1 Dec 41 -- President Roosevelt today &lt;br&gt; announced that a complete embargo would be placed on all shipments of
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Robert A. Woodward</name>
  <email>rober...@drizzle.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-22T06:55:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/aa99e776dcaecd2f/f60eacf94986716b?show_docid=f60eacf94986716b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/aa99e776dcaecd2f/f60eacf94986716b?show_docid=f60eacf94986716b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: WI Little Boy type weapon ready in July 1944?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;411ef3d2-adc8-4eb4-a1ad-66dce f47b...@l14g2000yqj.googlegrou ps.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; , &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;snip&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; It is one thing to make a mistake; it is quite another thing to &lt;br&gt; refuse to admit that it was one. Saipan was invaded June 15th, &lt;br&gt; 1944; it was declared secure on July 9th. The first B-29s arrived &lt;br&gt; Oct 12th, 1944. I don&#39;t consider 3 months to be &amp;quot;many&amp;quot;.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Tim McDaniel</name>
  <email>t...@panix.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-22T04:50:46Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/8ce06fbdff296844/ccdfe658349b8b6c?show_docid=ccdfe658349b8b6c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/8ce06fbdff296844/ccdfe658349b8b6c?show_docid=ccdfe658349b8b6c"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Online Timeline of Presidential Elections: from Geo. Washington to Barack Obama</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &amp;lt;gg7n18$lq...@news.motzarella. org&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; James McPherson, _Battle Cry of Freedom_, pp. 258-9: &lt;br&gt; Most interest at Montgomery focused on the choice of a provisional &lt;br&gt; president. There was no shortage of aspirants, but the final nod &lt;br&gt; went to a West Point graduate who would have preferred to be
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Rich Rostrom</name>
  <email>rrostrom.21stcent...@rcn.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-22T04:39:11Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/2b651203e96157c5/f2d924de61deb58f?show_docid=f2d924de61deb58f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/2b651203e96157c5/f2d924de61deb58f?show_docid=f2d924de61deb58f"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Maine-Nebraska in 1860</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  He probably gets 1 in MO; the MO 1st District was &lt;br&gt; dominated anti-slavery German immigrants and &lt;br&gt; elected Republican Frank Blair Representative with 44%. &lt;br&gt; Not likely, since Douglas won the popular vote in NJ - though &lt;br&gt; see below. &lt;br&gt; It should be noted that the results usually &lt;br&gt; given are somewhat deceptive. The &amp;quot;Breckinridge&amp;quot;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Alfred Montestruc</name>
  <email>montest...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-22T04:34:44Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/aa99e776dcaecd2f/69a1b772a2f6649f?show_docid=69a1b772a2f6649f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/aa99e776dcaecd2f/69a1b772a2f6649f?show_docid=69a1b772a2f6649f"/>
  <title type="text">Re: WI Little Boy type weapon ready in July 1944?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Your lack of point. &lt;br&gt; I addressed that in detail in the previous thread. Sure they had the &lt;br&gt; material, and could scrape together the labor to do it, but, and this &lt;br&gt; is the important point, you really need a thick concrete runway, and &lt;br&gt; it takes time for concrete to harden, and longer for thick concrete to &lt;br&gt; harden, and to build the needed long runways would cost a lot of labor
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>BradGuth</name>
  <email>bradg...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-22T04:32:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/c8b76f69cfd78a49/970b68b321845044?show_docid=970b68b321845044</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/c8b76f69cfd78a49/970b68b321845044?show_docid=970b68b321845044"/>
  <title type="text">Re: What’s new and improved about Venus</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Apparently the average person reading anything in Usenet/newsgroups is &lt;br&gt; deathly afraid of their own shadow, especially afraid to deductively &lt;br&gt; think about anything that&#39;s outside of their cozy mainstream status &lt;br&gt; quo box. &lt;br&gt; If I was as faith-based and past the point of no return would likely &lt;br&gt; make myself more than a little gun shy about the planet Venus.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Richard Gadsden</name>
  <email>rich...@gadsden.name</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-22T02:26:00Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/2b651203e96157c5/c144b1d209d538d3?show_docid=c144b1d209d538d3</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/2b651203e96157c5/c144b1d209d538d3?show_docid=c144b1d209d538d3"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Maine-Nebraska in 1860</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &amp;lt;7-6dnbxot8Ds1LrUnZ2dnUVZ_hidn ...@speakeasy.net&amp;gt; on Fri, 21 &lt;br&gt; Breckenridge wins everything near the Mississippi; the rest of Texas was &lt;br&gt; still nearly empty, I&#39;d have thought. Texas had only just got its second &lt;br&gt; congressman, and was still at-large, so it doesn&#39;t affect the EVs anyway; &lt;br&gt; Breckenridge gets all four.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>JBodi</name>
  <email>jb...@rogers.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-22T01:40:39Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/6ade25687429c7b0/765fe24add1fe9d8?show_docid=765fe24add1fe9d8</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/6ade25687429c7b0/765fe24add1fe9d8?show_docid=765fe24add1fe9d8"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Empty America - Part 41</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  -- Well, Stirling was a Canadian when he wrote the Draka novels, but &lt;br&gt; yeah, that is extra-funny. &lt;br&gt; it&#39;s just a hunch ... like the one I had when Alison purported to kill &lt;br&gt; Flashman in an IRA pub-bombing.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Graham Truesdale</name>
  <email>graham.truesd...@tiscali.nospam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-22T01:24:48Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/8ce06fbdff296844/f791b2705f93df5e?show_docid=f791b2705f93df5e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/8ce06fbdff296844/f791b2705f93df5e?show_docid=f791b2705f93df5e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Online Timeline of Presidential Elections: from Geo. Washington to Barack Obama</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  A few observations &lt;br&gt; Of the 6 states that Goldwater carried in &#39;64, only Arizona had &lt;br&gt; been carried by Nixon in &#39;60. Or if you prefer, of the 26 states &lt;br&gt; that Nixon carried in &#39;60, Goldwater carried only 1 in &#39;64. I make &lt;br&gt; this a loss of more than 95% of the 1960 states. &lt;br&gt; As recently as 1976, Texas went Democratic and California went
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Daniel Sindell</name>
  <email>da...@cablelynx.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-21T18:38:36Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/622ff82a9d70e14c/e536f0276fcd8c38?show_docid=e536f0276fcd8c38</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/622ff82a9d70e14c/e536f0276fcd8c38?show_docid=e536f0276fcd8c38"/>
  <title type="text">Re: what effect would the the German immigrant have on the rump USA if the CSA won?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  If the South won the Civil War, the Confederate States of America &lt;br&gt; would have some affect on the German immigrants in the United States? &lt;br&gt; This is from the alt.history.what-if newsgroup and may be &lt;br&gt; interesting to discuss: &lt;br&gt; On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:21:12 -0000, Straha &amp;lt;CreativeZenStr...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote:
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Graham Truesdale</name>
  <email>graham.truesd...@tiscali.nospam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-22T00:32:55Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/10bf68a77e4f9daa/f607f1c67b275797?show_docid=f607f1c67b275797</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/10bf68a77e4f9daa/f607f1c67b275797?show_docid=f607f1c67b275797"/>
  <title type="text">Re: FDR in 1924?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  NB that in the mid 20thC three unsuccessful Presidential candidates &lt;br&gt; in succession lived to run again. &lt;br&gt; 1. As you state, Dewey lost in 1944 and ran (again unsuccessfully) &lt;br&gt; in 1948. &lt;br&gt; 2. Stevenson lost in 1952 and ran (again unsuccessfully) in 1956. &lt;br&gt; 3. Nixon lost in 1960 and ran (successfully) in 1968.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Stephen Graham</name>
  <email>grah...@speakeasy.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-21T23:51:11Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/2b651203e96157c5/19d778a782c70637?show_docid=19d778a782c70637</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/2b651203e96157c5/19d778a782c70637?show_docid=19d778a782c70637"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Maine-Nebraska in 1860</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Texas looks screwy on that map. It seems to show Bell carrying the vast &lt;br&gt; majority of counties, when Breckenridge had a strong majority in popular &lt;br&gt; vote. I don&#39;t think the population was concentrated enough to produce &lt;br&gt; this result. &lt;br&gt; Not having done the math on a Congressional District by Congressional
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
