Message from discussion
New project idea: Bringing back Twitter SMS
Received: by 10.214.241.14 with SMTP id o14mr2684832qah.6.1218750573967;
Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <michaelsli...@gmail.com>
Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.188])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 7si5135735yxg.0.2008.08.14.14.49.32;
Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of michaelsli...@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.188 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.142.188;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of michaelsli...@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.188 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=michaelsli...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i7so346975tid.20
for <silicon-beach-australia@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to
:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
bh=ndilRTrfLVHHfKjQBx8eJm1LExJ7P86KRyE1O2igkKs=;
b=Lst73XCgXWEVRJn7YwH++NE6c9+3r8L+SrFGLv1emdy3XoNJGpOIQj6MBnw608v8nS
bWjiO1j++WfinwKTMgezFSjT3jRo8TdLDZuVONpyH9IZ3bufx10ciyFSCydq86JphByL
xtlFxEgFqgn1bQi8kTjWyKKRYRCdhWZA0unbw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
:references;
b=KVXzOCn5Cdk9DKDwIczJ45rIuVwaiJn6fAVexBvXjZ0s4i1zsEuTfzuHw14l26cJKm
ERusSVLk5FfFBrEeTIDoo2IkqAkyZsrYaaZtTsUaUNgB5oFOK03kdKcQL2jI0MEVRvlF
DJTir6oI6Keatqks6StiyokgYfO8IQbk9Vrxk=
Received: by 10.110.109.19 with SMTP id h19mr1599529tic.58.1218750571654;
Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.110.57.18 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5e01c29a0808141449m641b0119n829e0c4152a58...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:49:31 +1000
From: silky <michaelsli...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: michaelsli...@gmail.com
To: silicon-beach-australia@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [SiliconBeach] Re: New project idea: Bringing back Twitter SMS
In-Reply-To: <060401c8fe07$4852a0e0$d8f7e2a0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <ecf61834-df56-4423-9c64-c90bca61e...@s1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
<9764bcf2-6690-433a-a43f-dcd02972f...@z11g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
<5e01c29a0808140457q4b17fcckaab7cc99f790...@mail.gmail.com>
<D8D25AE89091A348AF840CCAC9BB1EE14F7665D...@win2k3.local.internetrix.com.au>
<be77b7e70808140509q55d25995ra54a5cefa381c...@mail.gmail.com>
<5e01c29a0808140511k3f46751x590aa4d6ee700...@mail.gmail.com>
<060401c8fe07$4852a0e0$d8f7e2a0$@com>
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Michael Specht <mspe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> My idea is to have a user controlled system where you limit the number of
> SMS's you get per week, funding out of a PayPal subscription. If you want
> 50, then set 50. If I could get a $0.10 gateway going that would be a fairly
> minor cost for most people. The main use I see would be for DM's anything
> else is too high volume to be viable.
yes but it's still trivial to waste anyone's money who is signed up
with this system. obviously if someone does that to you you can just
stop being friends with them, but yeah. i'm doubtful of it's
long-term success for the reasons i listed.
> Michael Specht
> Principal Consultant
>
> Phone: +61 3 9017 1865 | Mobile: 0418 212 041 | Skype: mspecht
> Email: mich...@inspecht.com.au Web: inspecht.com.au
--
noon silky
http://www.themonkeynet.com/armada/
|
