Message from discussion
New project idea: Bringing back Twitter SMS
Received: by 10.215.40.2 with SMTP id s2mr2677908qaj.4.1218750668543;
Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <michaelsli...@gmail.com>
Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.184])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 39si5146146yxd.2.2008.08.14.14.51.06;
Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of michaelsli...@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.184 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.142.184;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of michaelsli...@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.184 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=michaelsli...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a6so383518tib.25
for <silicon-beach-australia@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to
:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
bh=DTRLbjwh2vHOsMohrUgyILElrLBu6BHXS8JMRK/Az+k=;
b=Bpd3/EU8XdwPfM8MChaqYL6CYc6OAIFDiIVtshzbjRIs6a9R8/e9REaCzbsqayMODC
/TOPv0LdPd32b+vDRoLzANKaQA8gZ3ocSyip2QG2/QqdTYTFORIyKl3w7SKrJ0mToV+g
3tmyGQY7nH2Q2tpTS3ZFj6qyv0hSCJQ6rGuIU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
:references;
b=PknY7Cyr0a3ar8eMrbjtNCr2OYIQ+BWSQfue9BMqmmHKkFPEeB4OGr1RDNvT9YFT0I
5banmqnA+xRD+2f+3HwB6lonoO4Uwtyi6ohrHgZtR3SGAjOyi1H11YzANjxI9U3eWpYN
i0UpBclRd2vC9QDvu3/dEwRUPuGh8F4JHEE8I=
Received: by 10.110.109.12 with SMTP id h12mr1600206tic.34.1218750666214;
Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.110.57.18 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5e01c29a0808141451h6b8b519fs1693e51afef2...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:51:06 +1000
From: silky <michaelsli...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: michaelsli...@gmail.com
To: silicon-beach-australia@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [SiliconBeach] Re: New project idea: Bringing back Twitter SMS
In-Reply-To: <D8D25AE89091A348AF840CCAC9BB1EE14F7665D...@win2k3.local.internetrix.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <ecf61834-df56-4423-9c64-c90bca61e...@s1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
<9764bcf2-6690-433a-a43f-dcd02972f...@z11g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
<5e01c29a0808140457q4b17fcckaab7cc99f790...@mail.gmail.com>
<D8D25AE89091A348AF840CCAC9BB1EE14F7665D...@win2k3.local.internetrix.com.au>
<be77b7e70808140509q55d25995ra54a5cefa381c...@mail.gmail.com>
<5e01c29a0808140511k3f46751x590aa4d6ee700...@mail.gmail.com>
<060401c8fe07$4852a0e0$d8f7e2a0$@com>
<D8D25AE89091A348AF840CCAC9BB1EE14F7665D...@win2k3.local.internetrix.com.au>
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Geoff McQueen
<geoff.mcqu...@internetrix.com.au> wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> I've heard Distribute IT have a good price offshore deal hooked up. The ZA connection
> was merely speculative, but I'm told they have about a 1/7th purchasing power exchange
> rate, yet first world infrastructure for interconnects, so they are worth looking at.
>
> There could be much better deals out there; but sub 5c/message isn't unheard of (although
> the preparedness of some networks to receive messages from these networks isn't as solid
> as paying 20c or so through an AU gateway)
indeed; the thing you pay for in messaging is reliability. I wouldn't
be going offshore for that.
> Geoff
--
noon silky
http://www.themonkeynet.com/armada/
|
