Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion New project idea: Bringing back Twitter SMS

View parsed - Show only message text

Received: by 10.214.217.11 with SMTP id p11mr1612880qag.11.1218715911667;
        Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <michaelsli...@gmail.com>
Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.190])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 39si3598752yxd.2.2008.08.14.05.11.50;
        Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of michaelsli...@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.190 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.142.190;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of michaelsli...@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.190 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=michaelsli...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j3so208482tid.8
        for <silicon-beach-australia@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to
         :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=6OgZABcwR0C7DAbQI1YjYkYEjaGDqP2tWPhWYADemhY=;
        b=j0BYvUsfm871dMsfhzpwjU0FM8SgWpG83yniqk/6qVMJQcktITij3UrY/IlaOlewPT
         GeeXClOGUQYtXI0Davh70ZQWAJf+Aq/FnnsYN23tBDvYRnajtSujzaCrV/SKBtlyUSLh
         djXxpRGlVc01czFUEK6DIQWu6v+/mYTuYhFKw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=LkyFOxANwnvbh+m5N3rQalNdk2KF17L8D61leMU64iMVL5OWK5kOWUG2VQfuO0qrjy
         5hKD7YlHoL+urk7Zq9f5PdqhQOTkFBBdQ+XHrvyg23fWik0+0gPeAhfum76SrRmpiqeS
         d/+8AJspYkaW4ZAruWK0jpT5wmQVrmlsnHORk=
Received: by 10.110.69.5 with SMTP id r5mr1057921tia.17.1218715909369;
        Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.110.57.18 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5e01c29a0808140511k3f46751x590aa4d6ee700...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:11:49 +1000
From: silky <michaelsli...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: michaelsli...@gmail.com
To: silicon-beach-australia@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [SiliconBeach] Re: New project idea: Bringing back Twitter SMS
In-Reply-To: <be77b7e70808140509q55d25995ra54a5cefa381c...@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <ecf61834-df56-4423-9c64-c90bca61e...@s1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
	 <9764bcf2-6690-433a-a43f-dcd02972f...@z11g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
	 <5e01c29a0808140457q4b17fcckaab7cc99f790...@mail.gmail.com>
	 <D8D25AE89091A348AF840CCAC9BB1EE14F7665D...@win2k3.local.internetrix.com.au>
	 <be77b7e70808140509q55d25995ra54a5cefa381c...@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Elias Bizannes
<elias.bizan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Let's not forget, you can only opt into the programme which I think is the
> point being missed.

not at all being missed; of course the system would be opt-in. but you
need to opt-out if you get too many messages. you don't control who
sends you messages [directly]. what i mean is you don't *initiate* it
(unlike the typical cost of sending an sms; you sent it, of course it
cost you money).


> No one is forcing you to pay to use twitter; but you
> have an option to use a service that satisfies your twitter addiciton, but
> also helps a greater cause. ersonally, I am willing to pay to receive SMS's
> from Twitter. A 55 cent message times a few dozen is not a big deal on my
> phone bill, given the value I get from twitter.

not at all disagreeing people won't use it. i'm just highlghting what
will happen in the community at large, and the sort of backlash you'll
see.


> Ivo's startup is one of any gateways we could use, I just know about his in
> detail. And yes, I made two [2]'s - apologies for the confusion.
>
> So Geoff, your analysis is more or less right. However it's the user that
> pays, because they are the ones that want the benefit. You can choose to use
> the service, not forced to.

-- 
noon silky
http://www.themonkeynet.com/armada/

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google