The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: sci.stat.math
From: Gary <LanceG...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 02:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 2 2009 7:46 pm
Subject: A test for discrete versus continuous?
This is a somewhat poorly formed question but the problem it
represents has troubled me several times in my career. Essentially many theories may state that a particular phenomenon exists either as a dimension or as a set of discrete categories. For example Reversal Theory in psychology states (amongst other things) that a person is either in a telic (purpose driven, arousal avoiding, future oriented) mode or in a paratelic (activity driven, arousal seeking, present oriented) mode and that people can't be somewhere "inbetween" the two modes. So Reversal theory is positing a set of two discrete categories and strongly claims that all people are in one or other of the two states and that there is no continuum between them. Similarly Fulda developed a mathematical model of the pull of temptation and asserts that the model works on discrete moments of thought (in other words the probabilities of temptation that are being modelled are discrete and not continuous). In my experience it is really hard to devise tests for claims of this kind. I wondered whther there are any existing statistical tests designed to to test hypotheses of this kind, or whether there are procedures and designs suitable for testing such claims? Lance You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||