Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Stay away from "vision educators"
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Kory Postma  
View profile  
 More options Mar 30 2008, 10:07 pm
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
From: Kory Postma <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Mar 30 2008 10:07 pm
Subject: Re: Stay away from "vision educators"
On 30 Mar, 13:06, Mike Tyner <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On 30 Mar, 13:05, Kory Postma <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:

> > On 30 Mar, 13:04, Mike Tyner <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > > "Kory Postma" <kor...@NOhotSPAMmail.com> wrote

> > > > oppositional movement), blink often and be able to remember things
> > > > exactly as they are meant to be seen, then the vision will improve.

> > > I missed something. What happens to make the vision improve?

> > > Does this work for myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, presbyopia?

> > > -MT

> > The fact that the person is unlearning bad habits and becoming more
> > relaxed and also having a clear mind and memory, that will improve the
> > sight.  I may be a little wrong,  but this is what I remember after
> > reading Bates.

> > Kory

> Clearing the mind, improving the memory, and relaxing are all noble
> goals.

> But when it comes to describing specifically how (or even whether) it
> reduces myopia, presbyopia, or astigmatism, we can't find good
> evidence other than enthusiastic anecdotes.

> Bates said it "improves sight". Maybe in a new-age sort of fashion, it
> does. But it doesn't reduce structural anomalies and it can't be
> relied on as a cure for macular degeneration or glaucoma or cataract.
> There MIGHT even be some measurable effects. But doctors have to
> recommend what DOES work first, before they recommend what MIGHT work
> A LITTLE for SOME.

> -MT

Actually Bates said it would work for everyone who did not have
organic problems (from accidents, etc.).  But Bates only showed people
what to do, they would have to continue it at home and all day long.
They would then be seen 2-3 times a week.

Mike, I think it would be best to become a little more familiar with
Bates.  Would you like me to scan in a short piece that he had from
the magazines that would explain what an average first visit was like?
Or if you would like any other info, and if I have time, I would be
willing to try to dig up whatever you like and post it here.

Kory


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google