Message from discussion
Stay away from "vision educators"
Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!m71g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Jenny06427 <lite...@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Subject: Re: Stay away from "vision educators"
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <c483c175-9838-47ce-a446-5a2cd25277c7@m71g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
References: <5c58e0d1-9b12-42fc-b541-b0e21ac201b8@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
<31f5037b-2a84-40ca-ae9b-0b3469dacd4d@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
<7b22d1c0-f7eb-462e-851c-b46a64f37d3f@m71g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
<5b75bdac-883d-4fd6-87fb-c4bc1478a3be@z38g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
<370b87a0-9f26-493c-8c0f-5b2f46001cb4@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
<6a97121c-b1a8-4b86-92a4-5cfbdc5bf2b5@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
<0fc77cc3-eb62-4cd4-a21c-a33345912a71@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
<b2dfab4a-eec8-4095-8a12-89a0520ba9be@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
<f8d9f984-7b1b-452b-a2e7-6968203146d6@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
<0d8b1c83-9db8-44a0-9e72-dfe66d593937@m71g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
<2976925e-3f96-4a02-9d0d-d24b62e2fc3c@a22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
<1612ca7a-f7dd-41ed-b573-1ab6b877088c@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.199.160.31
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1206879895 10535 127.0.0.1 (30 Mar 2008 12:24:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:24:55 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: m71g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=90.199.160.31;
posting-account=_Gm4UgoAAAC2-81M-H--nVC5SC5u3ptc
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.13)
Gecko/20080311 Firefox/2.0.0.13,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
On 30 Mar, 13:24, Mike Tyner <lite...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> "Mike Tyner" <mty...@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:iLVY
> > No but that wasnt' the argument. Bates said they
> >see better color and form worse
> > with glasses. Nonsense.
>
> I meant "see color and form worse with glasses."
You know I wasted too much time arguing the point even with 20/20
correction someone with glasses doesn't have the same quality of
vision as someone with perfect sight, acuity same, function may be
fine, but there's at least a little difference in ways things are
seen. Glasses are a pain and most everyone would prefer to have
perfect sight, thus the popularity of unnecessary surgical risk.
|
