Message from discussion
Stay away from "vision educators"
Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Kevin <lite...@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Subject: Re: Stay away from "vision educators"
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <fe3a7945-322c-4b1b-ae01-ff733b45c170@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
References: <5c58e0d1-9b12-42fc-b541-b0e21ac201b8@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
<0fc77cc3-eb62-4cd4-a21c-a33345912a71@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
<b2dfab4a-eec8-4095-8a12-89a0520ba9be@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
<f8d9f984-7b1b-452b-a2e7-6968203146d6@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
<0d8b1c83-9db8-44a0-9e72-dfe66d593937@m71g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
<2976925e-3f96-4a02-9d0d-d24b62e2fc3c@a22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
<1612ca7a-f7dd-41ed-b573-1ab6b877088c@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
<c483c175-9838-47ce-a446-5a2cd25277c7@m71g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
<e9e22bef-0069-479a-8ffb-1d1b6c2630c7@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
<5824817a-ca97-4f13-a00c-30ca3d3fb0aa@a23g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
<e9eeb0ca-a3d0-4ff4-9565-bedf7f655517@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
<008f8a99-260b-4cd0-b40e-80804e91beac@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.199.160.31
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1206880668 19348 127.0.0.1 (30 Mar 2008 12:37:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:37:48 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=90.199.160.31;
posting-account=_Gm4UgoAAAC2-81M-H--nVC5SC5u3ptc
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.13)
Gecko/20080311 Firefox/2.0.0.13,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
In article <Mn6Za.5577$BC2.1...@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
mty...@mindspring.com says...
> So you blame glasses for lattice degeneration? That's new.
> -MT
No, not quite - see my response to LarryDoc.
I'm coming from the experience of teaching people the method, and one
of the most common improvements is in the sensitivity of the
peripheral vision. There needs to be some controlled studies done to
verify/negate this observation, but in due course that will come
about.
Kevin