Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
From: otisbr...@embarqmail.com
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Mar 30 2008 3:07 pm
Subject: Dr. Bates: The Effect of the Minus on the Eye's Refractive STATE
Subject: Is Dr. Bates, right or wrong? About the Science is never merely knowledge; it is orderly knowledge. Josiah Royce Arguments are to be avoided. They are always vulgar -- and Oscar Wilde This is Dr. Bates' statement about his reason for his I believe that the parents should be aware of the proven It is intellectually short-sighted continue to deny the Objection to the over-prescribed minus -- is the _______________________________________________ From Chapter 8 by Dr. Bates (Clarifying statement added -- minus lens) ...That (minus-lens) glasses must injure the eye is evident But refractive errors, in the eye which is left to itself, After people once begin to wear (minus-lens) glasses their A person with myopia of 20/70 who puts on glasses giving him We have the testimony of Dr. Sidler-Huguenin, of Zurich, That the human eye resents (minus lens) glasses is a fact Every oculist knows that patients have to "get used" to them, The strong concave glasses required by myopes of high degree These are unpleasantness that cannot be overcome... All glasses contract the field of vision to a greater or less As for putting (minus-lens) glasses upon a child it is enough Dr. William H. Bates, Ophthalmologist _______________________________________________ COMMENTARY ** Except that they do. Witness the adverse reactions here on _________________________________________ SCIENTIFIC PERSPECTIVE The task of science is both to extend the range of our Niels Bohr, You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||