<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>sci.med.vision Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision</link>
  <description>Human vision, visual correction, and visual science.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: A warning about concerning Otis and lampiste leouche</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/f088d8beba69b0f2/514d7c37305f627c?show_docid=514d7c37305f627c</link>
  <description>
  Sure there is. &lt;br&gt; It&#39;s you.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/f088d8beba69b0f2/514d7c37305f627c?show_docid=514d7c37305f627c</guid>
  <author>
  neil0...@yahoo.com
  (Neil Brooks)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:27:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: look, a color matching test</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/2f7f4c58600595c0/cc6cfa9d655c2115?show_docid=cc6cfa9d655c2115</link>
  <description>
  Ok thanks on the distinction. &lt;br&gt; But I suppose an aging cataract plays havoc to the color test. &lt;br&gt; Don W.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/2f7f4c58600595c0/cc6cfa9d655c2115?show_docid=cc6cfa9d655c2115</guid>
  <author>
  dwil...@prodigy.net
  (Don W)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:04:04 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Watery eyes</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/1b00ba8e4eebf7c1/13aa85f5c610ab83?show_docid=13aa85f5c610ab83</link>
  <description>
  Well, bingo, I think we&#39;ve diagnosed the cause of your excessive &lt;br&gt; tearing! Actually, 67% of the people with aniseikonia are reported to &lt;br&gt; suffer from astenopia (excessive tearing, fatigue, burning, ache, &lt;br&gt; pain, pulling). I&#39;m very familiar with your problem, Bill, because I &lt;br&gt; also have aniseikonia related to damage from an epiretinal membrane,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/1b00ba8e4eebf7c1/13aa85f5c610ab83?show_docid=13aa85f5c610ab83</guid>
  <author>
  clinton6...@hotmail.com
  (Jane)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:35:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: A warning about concerning Otis and lampiste leouche</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/f088d8beba69b0f2/e5e7bddf138da40b?show_docid=e5e7bddf138da40b</link>
  <description>
  Oh No, please don&#39;t encourage him to do THAT. He did in the past, he &lt;br&gt; flooded this forum with his ideas -- it was an unstoppable disaster.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/f088d8beba69b0f2/e5e7bddf138da40b?show_docid=e5e7bddf138da40b</guid>
  <author>
  mikabra...@gmail.com
  (Ms.Brainy)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:53:37 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: A warning about concerning Otis and lampiste leouche</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/f088d8beba69b0f2/0bcabbda0668535d?show_docid=0bcabbda0668535d</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lovok2QJwjA&amp;feature=channel&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; There is no problem here. &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Trust me&amp;quot; ... Jan
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/f088d8beba69b0f2/0bcabbda0668535d?show_docid=0bcabbda0668535d</guid>
  <author>
  otisbr...@embarqmail.com
  (Otis)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:37:17 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: My Methods with School Children</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/d1323a1d7c84d5f5/cd27b0f54f29c989?show_docid=cd27b0f54f29c989</link>
  <description>
  Uh-oh. &lt;br&gt; Otis is being an idiot again....
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/d1323a1d7c84d5f5/cd27b0f54f29c989?show_docid=cd27b0f54f29c989</guid>
  <author>
  neil0...@yahoo.com
  (Neil Brooks)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:50:35 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: My Methods with School Children</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/d1323a1d7c84d5f5/5d856a2ccb28499c?show_docid=5d856a2ccb28499c</link>
  <description>
  &amp;quot;Otis&amp;quot; &amp;lt;otisbr...@embarqmail.com&amp;gt; wrote &lt;br&gt; I think all MIMSY were the BOROGOVES. &lt;br&gt; -MT
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/d1323a1d7c84d5f5/5d856a2ccb28499c?show_docid=5d856a2ccb28499c</guid>
  <author>
  mty...@mindspring.com
  (Mike Tyner)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:11:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: A warning about concerning Otis and lampiste leouche</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/f088d8beba69b0f2/78879f94db943f8f?show_docid=78879f94db943f8f</link>
  <description>
  Just imagine that the keyboard doesn&#39;t hurt you. &lt;br&gt; -MT
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/f088d8beba69b0f2/78879f94db943f8f?show_docid=78879f94db943f8f</guid>
  <author>
  mty...@mindspring.com
  (Mike Tyner)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:06:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: A warning about concerning Otis and lampiste leouche</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/f088d8beba69b0f2/f7470651cb719580?show_docid=f7470651cb719580</link>
  <description>
  Lelouch Lamperouge schreef: &lt;br&gt; First of all try the first part harder please. &lt;br&gt; Second, did you know your keyboard has other possibilities than copy and &lt;br&gt; paste old stuff with the Ctrl key? &lt;br&gt; Typing your own ideas for instance? &lt;br&gt; Jan (normally Dutch spoken)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/f088d8beba69b0f2/f7470651cb719580?show_docid=f7470651cb719580</guid>
  <author>
  nos...@nospam
  (Jan)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:04:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>A warning about concerning Otis and lampiste leouche</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/f088d8beba69b0f2/bf00ea1473f6d084?show_docid=bf00ea1473f6d084</link>
  <description>
  Keep in mind these two layman know absolutely nothing about vision. &lt;br&gt; The only vision both have is providing you with the old fashioned ideas &lt;br&gt; of Bates. &lt;br&gt; Ignore both layman, the possibility exist that what they produce here &lt;br&gt; hurt you. &lt;br&gt; Jan (normally Dutch spoken
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/f088d8beba69b0f2/bf00ea1473f6d084?show_docid=bf00ea1473f6d084</guid>
  <author>
  nos...@nospam
  (Jan)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:31:09 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: look, a color matching test</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/2f7f4c58600595c0/819caf0253ef732c?show_docid=819caf0253ef732c</link>
  <description>
  Don W schreef: &lt;br&gt; Nobody did make this statement actually. &lt;br&gt; A colourvision test is different from a contrast sensitivity test. &lt;br&gt; And yes, cataract has effect on contrast. &lt;br&gt; Jan (normally Dutch spoken)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/2f7f4c58600595c0/819caf0253ef732c?show_docid=819caf0253ef732c</guid>
  <author>
  nos...@nospam
  (Jan)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:15:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: look, a color matching test</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/2f7f4c58600595c0/e01d19e4585bfa24?show_docid=e01d19e4585bfa24</link>
  <description>
  A cataract does not affect contrast? &lt;br&gt; Since when?? &lt;br&gt; Don W.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/2f7f4c58600595c0/e01d19e4585bfa24?show_docid=e01d19e4585bfa24</guid>
  <author>
  dwil...@prodigy.net
  (Don W)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:08:48 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Watery eyes</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/1b00ba8e4eebf7c1/fd4e1dbdf1d57a01?show_docid=fd4e1dbdf1d57a01</link>
  <description>
  In article &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;42b5fd7a-e3dc-4051-9fe0-1ea8f 5561...@g23g2000yqh.googlegrou ps.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; I am being examined by ophthalmologist more often than I would like to &lt;br&gt; be. Actually the exams are not too bad. It is the traveling and waiting &lt;br&gt; for hours for a few minutes of examination and inadequate consultation &lt;br&gt; that will drive me crazy.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/1b00ba8e4eebf7c1/fd4e1dbdf1d57a01?show_docid=fd4e1dbdf1d57a01</guid>
  <author>
  salmon...@sbcglobal.net
  (Salmon Egg)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:26:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: look, a color matching test</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/2f7f4c58600595c0/93493f78aa462470?show_docid=93493f78aa462470</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;he5c0k$ur...@news.eternal-sep tember.org&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; I looked at that test. Color matching on a computer screen is &lt;br&gt; questionable. The spectra of the phosphors vary with the technology used &lt;br&gt; to produce light. Moreover, merely changing contrast on the screen will &lt;br&gt; affect the color distribution. &lt;br&gt; Bill
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/2f7f4c58600595c0/93493f78aa462470?show_docid=93493f78aa462470</guid>
  <author>
  salmon...@sbcglobal.net
  (Salmon Egg)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:14:48 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: My Methods with School Children</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/d1323a1d7c84d5f5/d913301ecca861bf?show_docid=d913301ecca861bf</link>
  <description>
  So you think that an applied -3 diopter lens to a population of &lt;br&gt; NATURAL EYES had NO EFFECT on their MEASURED refractive STATE? &lt;br&gt; As an issue in ENGINEERING/SCIENCE -- and not in &amp;quot;medicine&amp;quot;? &lt;br&gt; But since you don&#39;t understand this issue clearly, let us just call &lt;br&gt; your &amp;quot;office bias&amp;quot; on this scientific issue -- the &amp;quot;Majority-Opinion&amp;quot;,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/d1323a1d7c84d5f5/d913301ecca861bf?show_docid=d913301ecca861bf</guid>
  <author>
  otisbr...@embarqmail.com
  (Otis)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:44:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
