sci.math Google Group

Re: A new definition of Cardinality.

aatu.koskensi...@uta.fi (Aatu Koskensilta) — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:09:47 UT

As you note, this is not where AC comes into play, since in the
inductive definition we don't need a (von Neumann) cardinal the size of
x because we can just include sets < |x| directly. The problem is, again
as you note, proving the existence of a closure ordinal for the
inductive definition; or, to put it slightly differently, showing that

Re: MAIL BOMB!

zzz....@qqq.net (Alan Ford) — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:05:05 UT

Herc, you old loon, you! How ya doin'? Has your Thorazine prescription
expired again?

Motivated by the challenges of languages and their beautiful elaboration.

me...@vzw.blackberry.net (marty.musatov@gmail.com) — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:52:05 UT

iuuq:// (TM) script: draft - sci.logic | Google Groups
Discovery services. BSD sockets. TCP/IP BPEL JINI Web services. XML RPC Group communication DHTs.
Multicast ....
The design of Http://MeAmI.org.org has been motivated by the challenges as we face languages and their beautiful elaboration. ...
[link]

Re: musatov 's Back.

me...@vzw.blackberry.net (marty.musatov@gmail.com) — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:35:31 UT

Hi, who are you?
<.ip..> <script type="text/javascript">
//Roundtrip
rtTop = Number(new Date());
document.documentElement.class Name += ' jsenabled';
(function () {
//refresh check
var d=document,c=";\ "+d.cookie + ";",msc=c.indexOf("; MSC="),re=false,s,r,l="",m,n=' 0',b,lck='',fps=c.indexOf("FPS ="),fpsVal,sw=screen.availWidt h,loc=location,qs=loc.search;

Re: $10,000 at 20:1

gl...@aol.com (glird) — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:39:07 UT

Taking that definition as too vague, I looked up the 2nd law on
yahoo and found this:
From Wikipedia:
The formulation of the second law that refers to entropy directly is
as follows:
Note that from the mathematical definition of entropy [see next
sentence], a process in which heat flows from cold to hot has

Re: The accuracy of the Calculus

r...@righthere.net (rabid_fan) — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:00:06 UT

I am speaking of concepts versus blind calculation within
an educational context. The conventional educator regards
the ability to perform rote calculations to be more important
than a deep conceptual understanding. This is true because
the fundamental structure of our schools does not readily permit

Re: The Bible And Evolution..compatible?

jabriol2...@gmail.com (Joseki) — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:50:40 UT

I really have to ask.. what in tarnation are you talking about?

Re: The Bible And Evolution..compatible?

jabriol2...@gmail.com (Joseki) — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:49:41 UT

uh no. please understand what "probability" in math refer to and then
you can grasp it better.

Re: The Mathematical Substructure Underlying Quantum Field Theory, and Why I Like Anthony Zee's Book so Much

anonymous.rubbert...@yahoo.com (A) — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:47:57 UT

What are some examples of paradoxes in ZFC?

Re: The Mathematical Substructure Underlying Quantum Field Theory, and Why I Like Anthony Zee's Book so Much

tommy1...@gmail.com (master1729) — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:29:45 UT

Kobee Wublee wrote :
i love that :)
reminds me of ZFC and the alike
faith (in axioms) = theory
lying (axioms are true and the best) = teaching
ZFC teacher = genius
occult beliefs = science
ZFC paradoxes ( many examples ) = kosher
bullshit = truth
believing ( axioms ) = learning
etc
regards
tommy1729

Re: Math/CompSci Interview Question - Thoughts?

mohangupt...@gmail.com (mohangupta13) — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:39:02 UT

sorry for giving much thought before writing.
Mohan

Re: Another AC anomaly?

je...@phiwumbda.org (Jesse F. Hughes) — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:27:44 UT

You know what makes a good joke a great joke?
When someone takes the time to explain it.

Re: Mathematics of Global warming

isr...@math.myuniversitysinitials.ca (Robert Israel) — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:30:32 UT

No. For all we know (given the model assumptions), all you ever have are
gentle breezes.
I found the following statement confusing:
(Like the swirled hairs on the tennis ball, the wind will spiral around this
zero-wind point - under our assumptions it cannot flow into or out of the point.)
There was no assumption that I could see that ruled out a situation where

Re: Mathematics of Global warming

tommy1...@gmail.com (master1729) — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:20:19 UT

they are globalists.

Re: A new definition of Cardinality.

ah...@freenet.carleton.ca (David Libert) — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:24:12 UT

[Deletions]
In my Nov 23 article in this thread
[link]
I wrote (quoting Rupert and indirectly Zuhair):
I was being careless in that writing. I was thinking of the same proof Rupert
wrote as quoted earlier above. In general I knew this as a ZFC theorem, but