Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Earth Cooling.
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
don findlay  
View profile  
 More options Feb 21 2003, 1:53 am
Newsgroups: sci.geo.geology
From: d...@tower.net.au (don findlay)
Date: 20 Feb 2003 06:53:56 -0800
Local: Fri, Feb 21 2003 1:53 am
Subject: Re: Earth Cooling.
eaglecleveland <eagleclevel...@netscape.com> wrote in message <news:MhX4a.56601$9U3.46628@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
> don findlay wrote:

> > 1.  Why does plate tectonics ignore the aggregate continuity and
> > spirality of transforms?
>  What are you talking about? Spirality of transforms?
> > 2.  When did the assumption of subduction stop being an assumption and
> > become a fact?
> > 3.  Why subduction anyhow, and not over-riding?

> How would you then explain volcanic arcs? Hot spots? Peleomagnetic dating of
> oceanic crust?

> Thinking of myself of a budding "good" scientist, I've read your alternative
> hypotheses. Where is your field data to back it up. Or is it just a guess?

> > Thus far these three have not attracted much response from supporters
> > of plate tectonics, not any that would satisfy many children I'm sure.

> I can see why. There's no data!

___________________________

'Spirality'/ 'spiral symmetry' = pics on this page you will already
have seen
<http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ee/nonsense.html >  Or do you reckon
like John Vidale there that those lines mean nothing? (But the little
active bits at the ridges do...?)

Volcanic arcs?  You mean island arcs of the Western Pacific? Then I
see them like this:- <http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ee/bab.html>
...and like this:-
<http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ee/alaska.html>

Or continental margin magmatic arcs (e.g. South American Andes)?  Like
this:-
<http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ee/p2-page2.html>   (North and South
America in pre-scissored position (joined at the hip).  (Neither sort
of 'volcanic arc'  should be thought of in terms of plate tectonics.)

Hot spots?  I think so-called  'hot spots' (as they are termed these
days - different from the original entry in Seyfert's Encyclopedia of
Plate tectonics - in line with PT finagling things that don't fit -
shifting the goal posts) directly reflect the rupture of Pangaea and
resulting  hemispherical adjustment.  I'll post an illustration.

Palaeomagnetic dating of oceanic crust?  Not sure exactly what you
mean..  What about it?

Field data/ no data?  Links above, .. most importantly the first one.
More added as we go.  All factual/ field data will support Earth
expansion ( excludes obvious assumptions like subduction and
convection)(Benioff *Zone and Heat-Related Uplift OK).   If you say
"There's no data", what sort of **field data would you like to see?  
Meantime you might like to check out  Dennis McCarthy's supporting
references:-
<http://groups.google.com/groups?q=expanding+earth&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&...>
 (join up if broken)
DF.  
Answers to the above three questions still sought from all young buds,
new growth, old growth, dead and even fossilized wood. ( Might the
forest yet mutter..?)


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google