Newsgroups: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic Subject: I've Decided on My Halloween Costume for This Year - BestHalloweenCostume.JPG Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:44:07 -0700 Message-ID: <sa2me5tf10rcqshindtg2bl4c1c2qf6lsi@4ax.com>
...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
An engineer is supposed to have an inquisitive mind and question unproven theories. Leftist weenies have neither attribute. Their behavior is of a religious nature. Thus, like all religious nut- cases, they should be culled from the fraternity and dispatched.
> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic > Subject: I've Decided on My Halloween Costume for This Year - > BestHalloweenCostume.JPG > Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:44:07 -0700 > Message-ID: <sa2me5tf10rcqshindtg2bl4c1c2qf6...@4ax.com>
> ...Jim Thompson
Dress up as Hillary Clinton and go as J Edgar Hoover.
-- Many thanks,
Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073 Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552 rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: d...@tinaja.com
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:18:42 -0700, Don Lancaster <d...@tinaja.com> wrote:
>Jim Thompson wrote: >> Posted on A.B.S.E:
>> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic >> Subject: I've Decided on My Halloween Costume for This Year - >> BestHalloweenCostume.JPG >> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:44:07 -0700 >> Message-ID: <sa2me5tf10rcqshindtg2bl4c1c2qf6...@4ax.com>
>> ...Jim Thompson
>Dress up as Hillary Clinton and go as J Edgar Hoover.
Don, Good one!
Only trouble, it's wasted on the leftist weenies, who would have no clue what your joke is ;-)
...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I always liked my old UNCLE SAM, but I hate my new BIG BROTHER
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:18:42 -0700, Don Lancaster <d...@tinaja.com> wrote:
>Jim Thompson wrote: >> Posted on A.B.S.E:
>> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic >> Subject: I've Decided on My Halloween Costume for This Year - >> BestHalloweenCostume.JPG >> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:44:07 -0700 >> Message-ID: <sa2me5tf10rcqshindtg2bl4c1c2qf6...@4ax.com>
>> ...Jim Thompson
>Dress up as Hillary Clinton and go as J Edgar Hoover.
>> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic >> Subject: I've Decided on My Halloween Costume for This Year - >> BestHalloweenCostume.JPG >> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:44:07 -0700 >> Message-ID: <sa2me5tf10rcqshindtg2bl4c1c2qf6...@4ax.com>
>> ...Jim Thompson
> Dress up as Hillary Clinton and go as J Edgar Hoover.
My local "alternative" newspaper has a pic of Florida Rep.Alan Grayson on it's front page,to be cut out and used as a Halloween mask.
And yet the paper is rabidly "progressive". Amazing.
>>> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic >>> Subject: I've Decided on My Halloween Costume for This Year - >>> BestHalloweenCostume.JPG >>> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:44:07 -0700 >>> Message-ID: <sa2me5tf10rcqshindtg2bl4c1c2qf6...@4ax.com>
>>> ...Jim Thompson
>> Dress up as Hillary Clinton and go as J Edgar Hoover.
>My local "alternative" newspaper has a pic of Florida Rep.Alan Grayson on >it's front page,to be cut out and used as a Halloween mask.
>And yet the paper is rabidly "progressive". Amazing.
Grayson is certainly an example of the classic village idiot.
...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Obama thinks the term "bully pulpit" actually means "pulpit bully"
>>>> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic >>>> Subject: I've Decided on My Halloween Costume for This Year - >>>> BestHalloweenCostume.JPG >>>> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:44:07 -0700 >>>> Message-ID: <sa2me5tf10rcqshindtg2bl4c1c2qf6...@4ax.com>
>>>> ...Jim Thompson
>>> Dress up as Hillary Clinton and go as J Edgar Hoover.
>>My local "alternative" newspaper has a pic of Florida Rep.Alan Grayson >>on it's front page,to be cut out and used as a Halloween mask.
>>And yet the paper is rabidly "progressive". Amazing.
> Grayson is certainly an example of the classic village idiot.
> ...Jim Thompson
also of the "snotty Liberal". He's as nasty as they come. "Rabid" is a good descriptor.
>>>>> Jim Thompson wrote: >>>>>> Posted on A.B.S.E:
>>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic >>>>>> Subject: I've Decided on My Halloween Costume for This Year - >>>>>> BestHalloweenCostume.JPG >>>>>> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:44:07 -0700 >>>>>> Message-ID: <sa2me5tf10rcqshindtg2bl4c1c2qf6...@4ax.com>
>>>>>> ...Jim Thompson >>>>> Dress up as Hillary Clinton and go as J Edgar Hoover.
>>>> My local "alternative" newspaper has a pic of Florida Rep.Alan Grayson >>>> on it's front page,to be cut out and used as a Halloween mask.
>>>> And yet the paper is rabidly "progressive". Amazing. >>> Grayson is certainly an example of the classic village idiot.
>>> ...Jim Thompson >> also of the "snotty Liberal". He's as nasty as they come. >> "Rabid" is a good descriptor.
I read in the paper today that some us schools are banning certain halloween outfits because "they might frighten people", or may "offend some fundamentalist christians"
> I read in the paper today that some us schools are banning certain > halloween outfits because "they might frighten people", or may "offend > some fundamentalist christians"
> A world gone mad indeed :-)...
The following has been attributed to State Representative Mitchell Kaye from GA. [This guy should run for President one day.]
********** "We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the blessings of debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt ridden, delusional, and other liberal bed-wetters. We hold these truths to be self evident: that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights."
ARTICLE I: You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV, or any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.
ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended. This country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone--not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc; but the world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.
ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful; do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy.
ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing. Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes.
ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we're just not interested in public health care.
ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don't be surprised if the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair.
ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If you rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don't be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won't have the right to a big screen color TV or a life of leisure.
ARTICLE VIII: You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure want you to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful.
ARTICLE IX: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American means that you have the right to PURSUE happiness, which by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an over abundance of idiotic laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.
ARTICLE X: This is an English speaking country. We don't care where you are from, English is our language. Learn it or go back to wherever you came from!
(Last...)
ARTICLE XI: You do not have the right to change our country's history or heritage. This country was founded on the belief in one true God. And yet, you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any faith, or no faith at all; with no fear of persecution. The phrase IN GOD WE TRUST is part of our heritage and history, and if you are uncomfortable with it, TOUGH!!!!!
Just an added note:
These words are in no way meant to insult anyone, but to inform. And if you are insulted, then you need to take a closer look at your lifestyle, and make some shifts in your life. Because these words are very true, and are what this great nation was built on. Think about that, This Great Nation was built on the idea that we have to work, believe and earn our own living, without the help of anyone else! It is why we fought England, and it is why we will fight the immigrants who don't want to become Americans! ********** -- Andrew
>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic >>>>> Subject: I've Decided on My Halloween Costume for This Year - >>>>> BestHalloweenCostume.JPG >>>>> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:44:07 -0700 >>>>> Message-ID: <sa2me5tf10rcqshindtg2bl4c1c2qf6...@4ax.com>
>>>>> ...Jim Thompson
>>>> Dress up as Hillary Clinton and go as J Edgar Hoover.
>>>My local "alternative" newspaper has a pic of Florida Rep.Alan Grayson >>>on it's front page,to be cut out and used as a Halloween mask.
>>>And yet the paper is rabidly "progressive". Amazing.
>> Grayson is certainly an example of the classic village idiot.
>> ...Jim Thompson
>also of the "snotty Liberal". He's as nasty as they come. >"Rabid" is a good descriptor.
But you didn't "make an appointment" ?:-)
...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
In Memoriam... Duane Lee Thompson October 31, 1972 - April 20,2006 4th Child, 2nd Son, of Jim & Naomi Thompson Victim of Colon Cancer Would Have been 37 Today
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:23:28 +0000, ChrisQ <m...@devnull.com> wrote: >Michael A. Terrell wrote: >> Jim Yanik wrote: >>> Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-Web-Site.com> wrote in >>> news:7ivme51lrh069825aigbqhdbn446e13fup@4ax.com:
>>>> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:49:10 -0500, Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov> >>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Jim Thompson wrote: >>>>>>> Posted on A.B.S.E:
>>>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic >>>>>>> Subject: I've Decided on My Halloween Costume for This Year - >>>>>>> BestHalloweenCostume.JPG >>>>>>> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:44:07 -0700 >>>>>>> Message-ID: <sa2me5tf10rcqshindtg2bl4c1c2qf6...@4ax.com>
>>>>>>> ...Jim Thompson >>>>>> Dress up as Hillary Clinton and go as J Edgar Hoover.
>>>>> My local "alternative" newspaper has a pic of Florida Rep.Alan Grayson >>>>> on it's front page,to be cut out and used as a Halloween mask.
>>>>> And yet the paper is rabidly "progressive". Amazing. >>>> Grayson is certainly an example of the classic village idiot.
>>>> ...Jim Thompson >>> also of the "snotty Liberal". He's as nasty as they come. >>> "Rabid" is a good descriptor.
>I read in the paper today that some us schools are banning certain >halloween outfits because "they might frighten people", or may "offend >some fundamentalist christians"
>A world gone mad indeed :-)...
>Regards,
>Chris
Frighten a Congressman, costume yourself as a voting machine.
...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
In Memoriam... Duane Lee Thompson October 31, 1972 - April 20,2006 4th Child, 2nd Son, of Jim & Naomi Thompson Victim of Colon Cancer Would Have been 37 Today
In article <4AEB1FF2.8020...@tinaja.com>, Don Lancaster <d...@tinaja.com> wrote: > Jim Thompson wrote: > > Posted on A.B.S.E:
> > Newsgroups: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic > > Subject: I've Decided on My Halloween Costume for This Year - > > BestHalloweenCostume.JPG > > Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:44:07 -0700 > > Message-ID: <sa2me5tf10rcqshindtg2bl4c1c2qf6...@4ax.com>
> > ...Jim Thompson
> Dress up as Hillary Clinton and go as J Edgar Hoover.
Hello, Don. And as for yourself, I will always be a loyal member of your fan club, even if you were dressed as Dorothy Gale (Cairn terrier optional) ;-) Sincerely,
John Wood (Code 5550) e-mail: w...@itd.nrl.navy.mil Naval Research Laboratory 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20375-5337
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:23:28 +0000, ChrisQ <m...@devnull.com> wrote: >Michael A. Terrell wrote: >> Jim Yanik wrote: >>> Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-Web-Site.com> wrote in >>> news:7ivme51lrh069825aigbqhdbn446e13fup@4ax.com:
>>>> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:49:10 -0500, Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov> >>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Jim Thompson wrote: >>>>>>> Posted on A.B.S.E:
>>>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic >>>>>>> Subject: I've Decided on My Halloween Costume for This Year - >>>>>>> BestHalloweenCostume.JPG >>>>>>> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:44:07 -0700 >>>>>>> Message-ID: <sa2me5tf10rcqshindtg2bl4c1c2qf6...@4ax.com>
>>>>>>> ...Jim Thompson >>>>>> Dress up as Hillary Clinton and go as J Edgar Hoover.
>>>>> My local "alternative" newspaper has a pic of Florida Rep.Alan Grayson >>>>> on it's front page,to be cut out and used as a Halloween mask.
>>>>> And yet the paper is rabidly "progressive". Amazing. >>>> Grayson is certainly an example of the classic village idiot.
>>>> ...Jim Thompson >>> also of the "snotty Liberal". He's as nasty as they come. >>> "Rabid" is a good descriptor.
>I read in the paper today that some us schools are banning certain >halloween outfits because "they might frighten people", or may "offend >some fundamentalist christians"
>A world gone mad indeed :-)...
>Regards,
>Chris
Should only be a few years and lawsuits before they start banning anything that might offend Islamic peoples.
> Should only be a few years and lawsuits before they start banning > anything that might offend Islamic peoples.
Well, 'incitement to religious hatred' ia already an offence in the uk and quite right too imnsho. My dad's generation didn't fight ww2 so that modern age fascists or stasi lookalikes could take over the world. The fact that so called civilised nations have an underbelly of primitive sentiment that requires a bogeyman to rally against is quite sad really.
It's every citizen's duty to be aware of current events and speak out against extremism of any kind. Wasn't it an American who said that "all it takes is men of good character to stand by and do nothing for extremism to win", or something similar...
> I read in the paper today that some us schools are banning certain > halloween outfits because "they might frighten people", or may "offend > some fundamentalist christians"
Which of course would be a complete nonsense, for if the fundamentalists of one religion or another maintain that theirs is the only god, then anything else is only make-believe and cannot therefore be any threat to them.
If, on the other hand, they raise objections because of some aspect of "evil" or something similar, then they give credence to the other pursuits and raise the very serious question that if there are gods behind those other pursuits, then perhaps we'd better worship them?
>> Well, 'incitement to religious hatred' ia already an offence in the uk and >> quite right too imnsho.
>Discussions to the effect that religion is a manifestation of make-believe >are not incitements to hatred.
Religion is the root of ALL evil.
...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:23:29 +0000, ChrisQ <m...@devnull.com> wrote: >JosephKK wrote:
>> Should only be a few years and lawsuits before they start banning >> anything that might offend Islamic peoples.
>Well, 'incitement to religious hatred' ia already an offence in the uk >and quite right too imnsho. My dad's generation didn't fight ww2 so that >modern age fascists or stasi lookalikes could take over the world. The >fact that so called civilised nations have an underbelly of primitive >sentiment that requires a bogeyman to rally against is quite sad really.
So you think the government should guarantee that you aren't offended?
>It's every citizen's duty to be aware of current events and speak out >against extremism of any kind. Wasn't it an American who said that "all >it takes is men of good character to stand by and do nothing for >extremism to win", or something similar...
What do you do when "speaking out" is illegal? Who dictates what is "offensive"? Are you really that thin-skinned? Do you want to live in a world where *EVERYONE* is that thin-skinned? Sheesh!
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:55:52 -0600, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:23:29 +0000, ChrisQ <m...@devnull.com> wrote:
>>JosephKK wrote:
>>> Should only be a few years and lawsuits before they start banning >>> anything that might offend Islamic peoples.
>>Well, 'incitement to religious hatred' ia already an offence in the uk >>and quite right too imnsho. My dad's generation didn't fight ww2 so that >>modern age fascists or stasi lookalikes could take over the world. The >>fact that so called civilised nations have an underbelly of primitive >>sentiment that requires a bogeyman to rally against is quite sad really.
>So you think the government should guarantee that you aren't offended?
>>It's every citizen's duty to be aware of current events and speak out >>against extremism of any kind. Wasn't it an American who said that "all >>it takes is men of good character to stand by and do nothing for >>extremism to win", or something similar...
>What do you do when "speaking out" is illegal? Who dictates what is >"offensive"? Are you really that thin-skinned? Do you want to live >in a world where *EVERYONE* is that thin-skinned? Sheesh!
Careful there, "krw", you're about to slip and use the M-word, a word you know to offend some bent weenies ;-)
...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:23:29 +0000, ChrisQ <m...@devnull.com> wrote:
>>JosephKK wrote:
>>> Should only be a few years and lawsuits before they start banning >>> anything that might offend Islamic peoples.
>>Well, 'incitement to religious hatred' ia already an offence in the uk
And Canada.
>>and quite right too imnsho.
well,you're wrong. People often get offended for the dumbest reasons.
Besides,Islam actively HATES all other religions AND non-believers. Just look at they they view (and treat)Jews. But the "progressives" don't call them out on that. Instead,Islam gets special protection.
>>My dad's generation didn't fight ww2 so that >>modern age fascists or stasi lookalikes could take over the world. The >>fact that so called civilised nations have an underbelly of primitive >>sentiment that requires a bogeyman to rally against is quite sad really.
> So you think the government should guarantee that you aren't offended?
>>It's every citizen's duty to be aware of current events and speak out >>against extremism of any kind. Wasn't it an American who said that "all >>it takes is men of good character to stand by and do nothing for >>extremism to win", or something similar...
IIRC,it was "for EVIL to win". See,"progressives"/liberals don't believe in good v evil,to them,everything is morally equivalent.
> What do you do when "speaking out" is illegal? Who dictates what is > "offensive"? Are you really that thin-skinned? Do you want to live > in a world where *EVERYONE* is that thin-skinned? Sheesh!
WHERE do people get the idea that there's some Constitutional protection against being offended?
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:00:05 -0600, Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov> wrote:
[snip]
>WHERE do people get the idea that there's some Constitutional protection >against being offended?
From the lame stream media ;-)
...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:23:29 +0000, ChrisQ <m...@devnull.com> wrote:
>>>JosephKK wrote:
>>>> Should only be a few years and lawsuits before they start banning >>>> anything that might offend Islamic peoples.
>>>Well, 'incitement to religious hatred' ia already an offence in the uk
>And Canada.
>>>and quite right too imnsho.
>well,you're wrong. People often get offended for the dumbest reasons.
>Besides,Islam actively HATES all other religions AND non-believers. >Just look at they they view (and treat)Jews. >But the "progressives" don't call them out on that. >Instead,Islam gets special protection.
>>>My dad's generation didn't fight ww2 so that >>>modern age fascists or stasi lookalikes could take over the world. The >>>fact that so called civilised nations have an underbelly of primitive >>>sentiment that requires a bogeyman to rally against is quite sad really.
>> So you think the government should guarantee that you aren't offended?
>>>It's every citizen's duty to be aware of current events and speak out >>>against extremism of any kind. Wasn't it an American who said that "all >>>it takes is men of good character to stand by and do nothing for >>>extremism to win", or something similar...
>IIRC,it was "for EVIL to win". >See,"progressives"/liberals don't believe in good v evil,to them,everything >is morally equivalent.
>> What do you do when "speaking out" is illegal? Who dictates what is >> "offensive"? Are you really that thin-skinned? Do you want to live >> in a world where *EVERYONE* is that thin-skinned? Sheesh!
>WHERE do people get the idea that there's some Constitutional protection >against being offended?
From the liberals of course. But are you dodging the question:
