Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Current flow BTL vs. SE
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  7 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Dave King  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 11:20 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: davidk...@estro.com (Dave King)
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:20:00 GMT
Subject: Current flow BTL vs. SE
I am trying to understand the practical implications of the differnece
in current flow between a SE vs. BTL amp.

First I take a length single wire and fold it over in half flat upon
itself so the two fly leads are at one end.

Then I connect the leads across the output of a earth referenced SE
amp and apply a sinewave to its input. The current now opposes in the
adjacent conductors and magnetic flux tends to cancel. The
cancellation obviously reaches its highest intensity at the peak of
the waveform.

So ... does the same effect occur if I were to use a BTL amp instead?
In this case the current flow is bidirectional (push/pull) per single
cycle, not one way. Does this mean two flux cancellations per cycle
will occur, given the above wire configuration?

Keep in mind that everytime the flow reverses at full amplitude
represents a cancellation event.

I can't get my head around it for some reason.

Dave King


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Phil Allison  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 12:23 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "Phil Allison" <phi...@tpg.com.au>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:23:00 +1100
Subject: Re: Current flow BTL vs. SE

"Dave King"

>I am trying to understand the practical implications of the differnece
> in current flow between a SE vs. BTL amp.

> First I take a length single wire and fold it over in half flat upon
> itself so the two fly leads are at one end.

> Then I connect the leads across the output of a earth referenced SE
> amp and apply a sinewave to its input. The current now opposes in the
> adjacent conductors and magnetic flux tends to cancel.

**  OK,  so far.

> The cancellation obviously reaches its highest intensity at the peak of
> the waveform.

**  The magnetic field cancellation effect is not related to the actual
current level.

> So ... does the same effect occur if I were to use a BTL amp instead?

** Got nothing to do with the source of current either.

> In this case the current flow is bidirectional (push/pull) per single
> cycle, not one way.

** Absolute bollocks.

There is nothing so different about a BTL amp.

A good way to imagine how a BTL output stage operates is to imagine the load
is made up of two identical loads in series -  each with exactly half the
resistance of the actual load.

Then note that there are equal and opposite polarity voltages at the ends of
that split load at ALL points in time.

Hence, the voltage at the middle point of the split load is  ALWAYS  ZERO
!!

So, it will make  NO difference if that middle point is connected to common
or ground.

So a BTL stage is essentially the same as TWO amplifiers driving TWO  loads
grounded at one end  - but the load resistance seen by each amplifier is *
half * the resistance of the bridge connected load.

.....   Phil


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
George Herold  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 1:53 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: George Herold <ggher...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:53:59 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 1:53 pm
Subject: Re: Current flow BTL vs. SE
On Nov 3, 8:23 pm, "Phil Allison" <phi...@tpg.com.au> wrote:

What's BTL?  I'm assuming that SE is single ended.

Thanks,
George H.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Phil Allison  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 2:03 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "Phil Allison" <phi...@tpg.com.au>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:03:32 +1100
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 2:03 pm
Subject: Re: Current flow BTL vs. SE

"George Herold"

What's BTL?

**  Bridge Tied Load  or more simply " bridge mode ".

 I'm assuming that SE is single ended.

**  Yep.

...  Phil


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dave King  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 3:03 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: davidk...@estro.com (Dave King)
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:03:46 GMT
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 3:03 pm
Subject: Re: Current flow BTL vs. SE
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:23:00 +1100, "Phil Allison" <phi...@tpg.com.au>
wrote:

>> The cancellation obviously reaches its highest intensity at the peak of
>> the waveform.

>**  The magnetic field cancellation effect is not related to the actual
>current level.

Can you please explain how this works. If there is no current or
voltage, there would be nothing to cancel. Logically then, at maximum
voltage or current cancellation should be more intense.

>> In this case the current flow is bidirectional (push/pull) per single
>> cycle, not one way.

>** Absolute bollocks.

Here is a quote from the TDA 2005 data sheet. "Voltage and current
swings are twice for a bridge amplifier in comparison with single
ended amplifier."

This implies to me there would be two flux cancellation events per
single cycle of sinewave when using a BTL amp.

If not, can you please further clarify your points?

Dave King


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Phil Allison  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 3:38 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "Phil Allison" <phi...@tpg.com.au>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:38:32 +1100
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 3:38 pm
Subject: Re: Current flow BTL vs. SE

"Dave King"
 "Phil Allison"

** I'll give it just one more try  -  folks.....

>>> The cancellation obviously reaches its highest intensity at the peak of
>>> the waveform.

>>**  The magnetic field cancellation effect is not related to the actual
>>current level.

> Can you please explain how this works. If there is no current or
> voltage, there would be nothing to cancel. Logically then, at maximum
> voltage or current cancellation should be more intense.

** Nothing wrong with seeing it like that.

    But cancellation is just cancellation.

>>> In this case the current flow is bidirectional (push/pull) per single
>>> cycle, not one way.

>>** Absolute bollocks.

> Here is a quote from the TDA 2005 data sheet. "Voltage and current
> swings are twice for a bridge amplifier in comparison with single
> ended amplifier."

** Silly misinterpretation by you.

In the above, " twice " =  twice the size.

If you read the rest of the paragraph that begins page 6,  this is perfectly
clear.

.....  Phil


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
miso@sushi.com  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 3:41 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "m...@sushi.com" <m...@sushi.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:41:57 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 3:41 pm
Subject: Re: Current flow BTL vs. SE
On Nov 3, 8:03 pm, davidk...@estro.com (Dave King) wrote:

Read the next line in the data sheet. Basically they are indicating
you get twice the voltage delivered to the load for a given supply
voltage.

I think you are trying to read too much into the "balanced line". The
differential signal is merely to get more power for the available
supply. Balanced lines are more critical for low level signals where
you are trying to reduce interference.

Most differential designs are not really differential. They just put
in an inverting stage and a second single ended amp.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google