Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Wireless RF
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jon Slaughter  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 2:25 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: "Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Slaugh...@Hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:25:46 -0600
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 2:25 am
Subject: Wireless RF
Are pretty much all modern transceiver IC's the same as far as the circuit?
All the ones I have looked at recently use a crystal and some passives for
the antenna which I assume are for impedance/resonance matching?

Obviously the IC capabilities are different and the impedance matching
techniques are too but basically it seems pretty simple circuit wise?
Hardest part being the antenna(After all, thats really all there is).

So, for the most part I can be pretty ignorant about all the special
transmission techniques and concepts(QAM, SSB, ISM, etc...) and still do
wireless very easy using these IC's? As long as I get the antenna
approximately right and hook up a uC/P then I should be able to do some
wireless(may be degraded but...)? Seems like it from what I've read in the
datasheets.

Guess I'm just supprised that it would be that easy but I suppose the IC
pretty much takes care of everything? (as far as just bit banging is
concerned)


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Charles  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 11:14 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: "Charles" <charlesschu...@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:14:45 -0500
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 11:14 am
Subject: Re: Wireless RF

"Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Slaugh...@Hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:hcpi1u$638$1@news.eternal-september.org...

http://www.analog.com/en/press-release/9_21_09_ADI_Delivers_Breakthro...

And others.  The RF IC, which was once a dream, is now here and making
advances that were once limited to digital ICs.

The antenna is often a PCB design, such as a patch device.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patch_antenna

It's never that easy.  RF is still magic.  RF is still heavily regulated.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google