rec.photo.misc Google Group

Re: Photo's at nexthill.com

Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:07:56 UT

I suspect that Ialdabaoth created Imperfection so that on this day Sat, 14 Nov
2009 12:22:17 -0700, one purporting to be Ranger <obran...@pier.com> could write
.
--------------------------
The Internet will become the
Sacred Sanctuary for Nutters and Idiots.
(Michel Nostradamus, December 14, 1503, July 2, 1566).

Photo's at nexthill.com

obran...@pier.com (Ranger) — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:22:17 UT

Re: Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning

savagedu...@{removespam}me.com (Savageduck) — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:24:27 UT

A friend got it for me overseas back in June. I had been trying to get
a copy from those vendors also.

Re: Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning

b...@1776.com (Robert Coe) — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:13:07 UT

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:40:49 -0800, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.co m>
wrote:
Where did you find the Tokina? Both B&H and Adorama have had it back-ordered
for months.
Bob

Re: Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning

pa...@-edgehill.net (Paul Furman) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:22:58 UT

I think the 14mm f/2.8 Sigma prime gets better reviews than the Nikon,
or very close, or better in some respects and significantly cheaper. In
this case the Sigma came years after the Nikon and Nikon now has a much
better zoom. There are other examples of pro lenses like 300/2.8 where
the Sigma performs very well for a fraction of the preposterous cost of

Re: Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning

savagedu...@{removespam}me.com (Savageduck) — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:40:49 UT

I have to agree Paul, I got a Sigma 12-24mm back in 2005 to use with my
D70, and other than some initial operator errors resulting in
vignetting, which I have now overcome, it has performed flawlesly ever
since on the D70 & my D300.
I have since picked up a Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 which is wonderful, sharp

Re: Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning

pa...@-edgehill.net (Paul Furman) — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:59:44 UT

Most of their customers would probably not bother to research & find the
info anyways <g>. That said, when I bought my only Sigma lens from the
Calumet pro store in SF, the salesman sneered at me: 'you don't want
that lens' as I handed over $800 or so... that's their 12-24 full format
which has been one of my most used lenses and I'm quite happy with it.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

m...@yahoo.com (mtsa) — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:47:05 UT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Release of ClickNServe v. 1.00 (BuddyShare enabled)
Fully automated Image sharing tool for all Windows-based devices from
anywhere in the World
November 1, 2009
MobileTimes announces the release of its fully automated image sharing tool
ClickNServe (aka Click And Serve) enabled with BuddyShare Technology for all

Re: Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning

scharf.ste...@geemail.com (SMS) — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:29:42 UT

I have seen one, and apparently there were a few people that bought
them. The list of issues with the SD10 was so long that it's hard to
believe anyone would have chosen that over a Canon or Nikon, but
apparently most of those customers had been using the Sigma film SLR and
wanted to continue to use their Sigma mount lenses.

Re: Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning

scharf.ste...@geemail.com (SMS) — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:21:00 UT

No, it's not an error to try to please everyone, it's an error to
actually please everyone.
Very true. And with an 85% failure rate, if that's true, they are at
least displeasing the renter that is the last one to rent the lens when
it fails.

Re: Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning

scharf.ste...@geemail.com (SMS) — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:03:28 UT

Thanks for the warning. In general you should avoid those third-party
lenese at all costs. There are often compatibility problems because the
lens was designed for the cameras available at the time, without any
knowledge of what future camera models with the same lens mount would be
capable of (not only mechanically, but in electronic communication

Re: REQ. Photograph of Gordon Roy Parker of Philadelphia(address supplied)

teddyb...@gmx.us (Teddybear) — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:04:21 UT

Don't you ever get tired of looking foolish? If you could get an injunction
against someone taking you photograph in a public place, TMZ, and the rest
of the Paps would be out of business. Even mentally ill newsloons don't
have any expectation of privacy in public places. That is to say, anywhere

Re: Photograph

leo.licht...@att.net (Leo Lichtman) — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:17:06 UT

there any reason you should not simply be regarded as a source of
amusement?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I think you have hit on his real purpose--to amuse, so why not just relax
and enjoy.

Re: Photograph

jkh...@aim.com (jkh001) — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 05:46:00 UT

Have you ever won such a case? Have you ever won /any/ case? Is there
any evidence you are other than a litigious twit? It seems clear that
you do not even understand what "right of publicity" means, so is
there any reason you should not simply be regarded as a source of
amusement?

Re: Photograph

r...@cybersheet.com (RayGordon) — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 05:39:35 UT

Oooh internet insults! So BRAVE!!
We'll see what the cops and the courts say, not some pathetically
incomptent and ireelevant blowhard like you who tries to suck the
naive into his little crusade.
Up for a meeting at YOUR local PD? I have an open invitation to come
in and file a criminal complaint there.