Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion WHY?!? Why am i thinking i need an SLR, and thinking of going 35mm?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Ron Hunter  
View profile
 More options Jan 19 2004, 1:45 pm
Newsgroups: rec.photo, rec.photo.35mm, rec.photo.digital, rec.photo.equipment, rec.photo.equipment.35mm, rec.photo.help
From: Ron Hunter <rphun...@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 20:44:35 -0600
Local: Mon, Jan 19 2004 1:44 pm
Subject: Re: WHY?!? Why am i thinking i need an SLR, and thinking of going 35mm?

Steven C (Doktersteve) wrote:
> OK. This might sound stupid.

> I have a sony dsc F717, and I use it quite a bit. I like the camera. I have
> owned it since last April, and so I am going on a year with it.

> When I bought it, I thought "good, now I wont have to buy anything else for
> some time", but now I am starting to feel as though it is really not doing
> the job for me I would like.
> I have thought of this rationally, there are a few features that I can
> simply love about the camera, such as its awesome macro capabilities, and
> nice zeiss lens (whether it is just the coating or not, its a nice lens).

> But there are a few things that I don't like, one of them being the lack of
> a changeable lens, a fixed 5x zoom, and a relatively tame "wide" angle zoom
> out.

> Added to that, I still am paying this sucker off. I got it before the price
> started to plummet, and I owe about 80% on it still.

> I don't really know if I would benefit very much from moving to the digital
> rebel right now. That isn't to say that I am not interested in DSLR, quite
> the opposite, I very much AM interested in it, but for now I feel for some
> reason like I would do well to explore SLR in general, and that puzzles me.
> I mean, there are all the added costs of developing, scanning (I don't have
> a good scanner, I would get photo cd's made), and buying film.
> I don't want to give up on digital, just to carry both camera's when I go
> out, and use both of them for different things.

> I know that when I do go DSLR, I will go canon. It is a personal preference
> that I have formed.
> As such, I have been looking at getting myself a decent used canon which
> takes EF mount lenses (so I can use the lenses on whatever DSLR I get in the
> next few years).

> WHAT ARE GOOD OPTIONS FOR SOMEONE LIKE ME?
> I was looking at the EOS Kiss, until I found out it was just a variation on
> the rebel, which as I understand it is a crippled camera for consumers.
> What about the late 1980's type cameras? The EOS-850 for instance?

> I don't want to spend much more than $200 Canadian for a used camera, but as
> I understand it, a good camera from the late 1980s that takes current lens
> technology will do me as well as a brand new ELAN 7 will, yes?

> What do you think. Thanks for any suggestions.

It seems, that needs aside, you really WANT a film SLR camera.  Yes, you
get changeable lenses, at considerable expense, and through the lens
viewing (which you ALREADY have on the F717).  But if what you want it a
film SLR, go for it!  You might want to keep the digital also.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google