<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>rec.photo.equipment Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment</link>
  <description></description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Another Newbie</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/d9917e4a58aa3491/dd5a144d9e61b710?show_docid=dd5a144d9e61b710</link>
  <description>
  Hi Rob &lt;br&gt; * Your Sigma 70-300 Macro II is sharpest when set at F8 according the a review I &lt;br&gt; read. I have the same lens, and yes its better at F8. &lt;br&gt; * Use as higher shutter speed as you can with telephoto lenses like the Sigma to &lt;br&gt; avoid shake/blur. Tripod is extremely handy, but bulky. &lt;br&gt; * A circular polarizer would help cut glare from water and allow you to see into
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/d9917e4a58aa3491/dd5a144d9e61b710?show_docid=dd5a144d9e61b710</guid>
  <author>
  d...@nz
  (D.R.)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 06:42:45 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Another Newbie</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/d9917e4a58aa3491/f1e69158a1ba6739?show_docid=f1e69158a1ba6739</link>
  <description>
  What you have is just fine (see below). If you don&#39;t know how to use it &lt;br&gt; effectively, you can leave the tripod behind. Use an ISO 100 print film for &lt;br&gt; bright daylight shots and a faster ISO 200 through ISO 800 print film for &lt;br&gt; lower light shots (evening or flash). The faster films will allow better
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/d9917e4a58aa3491/f1e69158a1ba6739?show_docid=f1e69158a1ba6739</guid>
  <author>
  stewa...@noearthlinkspam.net
  (Dwight Stewart)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 04:52:17 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Another Newbie</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/d9917e4a58aa3491/228f59c4c8fcd28d?show_docid=228f59c4c8fcd28d</link>
  <description>
  Much appreciated!!!! I am sure photography will be my second focus on my &lt;br&gt; honeymoon. Thank you for your quick response and I will definetly put your &lt;br&gt; advise to work. Hope to be able to share my best pic with the groups. &lt;br&gt; Thanks &lt;br&gt; Rob &lt;br&gt; misses. &lt;br&gt; want &lt;br&gt; all &lt;br&gt; help &lt;br&gt; capture
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/d9917e4a58aa3491/228f59c4c8fcd28d?show_docid=228f59c4c8fcd28d</guid>
  <author>
  thesa...@hotmail.com
  (Saint Chris)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 03:42:11 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Another Newbie</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/d9917e4a58aa3491/ba5a061734ab44e9?show_docid=ba5a061734ab44e9</link>
  <description>
  You are missing a fast lens. Could be some nice opportunities for &lt;br&gt; available light photography. Look at a Canon 50mm f/1.8 as they are &lt;br&gt; fast, sharp and inexpensive. Make a point of comparing its results to &lt;br&gt; either of your zooms ;) For fish underwater a polarizing filter is a &lt;br&gt; must. Serves double duty as it helps with landscapes. Improves
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/d9917e4a58aa3491/ba5a061734ab44e9?show_docid=ba5a061734ab44e9</guid>
  <author>
  nos...@yahoo.com
  (columbotrek)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 02:30:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Another Newbie</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/d9917e4a58aa3491/8baa40a728345e55?show_docid=8baa40a728345e55</link>
  <description>
  Hello All...I have copied a bunch of Photography Newsgroups in on this only &lt;br&gt; because of my limited time and lack of knowledge with not only Newsgroups &lt;br&gt; but also Photography. &lt;br&gt; Here is my scoop. I just got married yesterday (thank you) and we are &lt;br&gt; preparing for our trip to Bora Bora (&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.boraboralgoon.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;). I do not want
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/d9917e4a58aa3491/8baa40a728345e55?show_docid=8baa40a728345e55</guid>
  <author>
  thesa...@hotmail.com
  (Saint Chris)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 01:47:06 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Projector Bulb &quot;DLH&quot;</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/479debd5f7c3bcb6/4e9c81360ba9b41a?show_docid=4e9c81360ba9b41a</link>
  <description>
  Light Sources, Inc 1-800-882-8834 &lt;br&gt; Top bulb 1-800-867-2852 &lt;br&gt; Warren
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/479debd5f7c3bcb6/4e9c81360ba9b41a?show_docid=4e9c81360ba9b41a</guid>
  <author>
  hiv...@bresnan.net
  (Warren Weber)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 02:04:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Which Lens?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/4f3eb12f9d2ac940?show_docid=4f3eb12f9d2ac940</link>
  <description>
  Interesting stats... another website added to my favourites! &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m considering a lens such as the Canon or Sigma discussed here myself, how &lt;br&gt; do they compare on focus speed? &lt;br&gt; Alex
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/4f3eb12f9d2ac940?show_docid=4f3eb12f9d2ac940</guid>
  <author>
  nos...@hotmail.com
  (Alex)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2004 02:16:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Which Lens?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/d9fed3b636afa92b?show_docid=d9fed3b636afa92b</link>
  <description>
  The Canon is slightly sharper and has lower distortion, buth there&#39;s &lt;br&gt; very little in it: &lt;br&gt; Sigma AF 70-200/2,8 APO EX HSM &lt;br&gt; Photodo test result: 3,9 &lt;br&gt; Effective focal length: 72 - 193 mm &lt;br&gt; Weighted MTF for 70 mm: f2,8 0,73, f4 0,76, f8 0,75 &lt;br&gt; Weighted MTF for 135 mm: f2,8 0,76, f4 0,84, f8 0,87 &lt;br&gt; Weighted MTF for 200 mm: f2,8 0,78, f4 0,81, f8 0,81
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/d9fed3b636afa92b?show_docid=d9fed3b636afa92b</guid>
  <author>
  andre...@littlepinkcloud.invalid
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2004 13:23:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Which Lens?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/d84f145993991e8a?show_docid=d84f145993991e8a</link>
  <description>
  In message &amp;lt;19GdndAnxvEHOKTcRVn...@comcas t.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; It is a good lens, optically, according to all the reports and tests, &lt;br&gt; but the Canon is even better. The Canon 70-200 zooms are their sharpest &lt;br&gt; zooms, allegedly.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/d84f145993991e8a?show_docid=d84f145993991e8a</guid>
  <author>
  j...@no.komm
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2004 12:41:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Which Lens?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/8d8b51f769da5981?show_docid=8d8b51f769da5981</link>
  <description>
  and &lt;br&gt; I can&#39;t speak for the Canon, but I have the Sigma and I can tell you it&#39;s a &lt;br&gt; teriffic lens. Ignore the naysayers. The 70-200 f/2.8 EX is one of their &lt;br&gt; best lenses. &lt;br&gt; Mark
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/8d8b51f769da5981?show_docid=8d8b51f769da5981</guid>
  <author>
  mbohntras...@comcast.net
  (Mark B.)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2004 11:22:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Which Lens?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/0517425df44ed331?show_docid=0517425df44ed331</link>
  <description>
  in &lt;br&gt; decide &lt;br&gt; lenses &lt;br&gt; severly &lt;br&gt; I would hardly say that an increase of 0.1&amp;quot; in length and diameter, &lt;br&gt; (7.6&amp;quot;x3.3&amp;quot; vs. 7.7&amp;quot;x3.4&amp;quot;) and an increase of 6 and a half ounces (2.8 lbs. &lt;br&gt; vs. 3.2 lbs.)as a tremendous amount of extra weight and size. That&#39;s &lt;br&gt; somewhat in the realm of complaining about the pea under the stack of
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/0517425df44ed331?show_docid=0517425df44ed331</guid>
  <author>
  shadowcatc...@cox.net
  (Skip M)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2004 04:22:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Which Lens?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/99a04202b25b0ad7?show_docid=99a04202b25b0ad7</link>
  <description>
  and &lt;br&gt; There is one stop difference, and the Canon makes up for it by being easier &lt;br&gt; to handhold. A colleague of mine swapped a Sigma 70-200 EX for the Canon &lt;br&gt; 70-200 f4L and couldn&#39;t be happier. &lt;br&gt; Of course, if you already have a &amp;lt;35mm-&amp;gt;70mm zoom you could try the Canon &lt;br&gt; 200mm f2.8 prime...
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/99a04202b25b0ad7?show_docid=99a04202b25b0ad7</guid>
  <author>
  mcsa...@com.btinternet
  (Martin Francis)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 19:33:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Which Lens?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/76cb8f8a7ecb14c8?show_docid=76cb8f8a7ecb14c8</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;41385f09$0$29719$afc38...@new s.easynet.co.uk&amp;gt;, Dimitris &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;dimitri_74_nospam@nospam_hotm ail.com&amp;gt; writes &lt;br&gt; (1) I bought my daughter a Canon 70-200 f/4 last year; it is a superb &lt;br&gt; lens and she is very pleased with it. &lt;br&gt; (2) I have never used the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 EX; however, I have bought &lt;br&gt; 3 Sigma lenses in the past and concluded I will never buy another one. I
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/76cb8f8a7ecb14c8?show_docid=76cb8f8a7ecb14c8</guid>
  <author>
  da...@nospam.demon.co.uk
  (David Littlewood)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 14:15:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Which Lens?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/fd3c1ca502cb9730?show_docid=fd3c1ca502cb9730</link>
  <description>
  and &lt;br&gt; I have not used the Sigma but I own the Canon 70-200 f4L and love it. If &lt;br&gt; you look around you can find it used for $500 or less.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/fd3c1ca502cb9730?show_docid=fd3c1ca502cb9730</guid>
  <author>
  swtra...@tampabay.rr.com
  (Rick)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 14:40:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Which Lens?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/2237b4b3b0351636?show_docid=2237b4b3b0351636</link>
  <description>
  &amp;quot;Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)&amp;quot; &amp;lt;usern...@qwest.net&amp;gt; wrote in &lt;br&gt; message &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=413863CD.2090505@qwest.net&quot;&gt;news:413863CD.2090505@qwest.net&lt;/a&gt;... &lt;br&gt; expensive), &lt;br&gt; couple &lt;br&gt; and &lt;br&gt; I disagree. The tremendous amount of extra weight and size and cost severly &lt;br&gt; detracts from the usability of this lens. &lt;br&gt; Jimmy
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/2237b4b3b0351636?show_docid=2237b4b3b0351636</guid>
  <author>
  nos...@pleaseno.more
  (Jimmy Smith)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 14:19:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Which Lens?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/6363aa88bc2934ea?show_docid=6363aa88bc2934ea</link>
  <description>
  I have the Canon 70-200mm f/4L. It is so good and so crisp (and fast) that &lt;br&gt; all I can say is that is super great and definitely worth the price. When &lt;br&gt; you encounter a lens of this capability and you have any afinity for good &lt;br&gt; glass at all............ you actually cry a little when you hold it. I &lt;br&gt; dare anybody else here who owns this lens to tell me I&#39;m wrong.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/6363aa88bc2934ea?show_docid=6363aa88bc2934ea</guid>
  <author>
  nos...@pleaseno.more
  (Jimmy Smith)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 14:18:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Which Lens?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/13efc11a8eb33a4f?show_docid=13efc11a8eb33a4f</link>
  <description>
  Money spent on Sigma is money thrown down a hole.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/13efc11a8eb33a4f?show_docid=13efc11a8eb33a4f</guid>
  <author>
  tspad...@ncmaps.rr.com
  (Tony Spadaro)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 13:56:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Which Lens?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/6f04a3cf581484c0?show_docid=6f04a3cf581484c0</link>
  <description>
  Yeah, but he could get both of those lenses for the price of the IS version. &lt;br&gt; For me it&#39;s just way too expensive. I opted for the 70-200 2.8L version and &lt;br&gt; couldn&#39;t be happier.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/6f04a3cf581484c0?show_docid=6f04a3cf581484c0</guid>
  <author>
  drazenrem...@stojcic.com
  (Drazen Stojcic / BUNTOVNIK)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 13:09:24 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Which Lens?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/0bd1216f4e3f6363?show_docid=0bd1216f4e3f6363</link>
  <description>
  There is no comparison. Go with the Canon &amp;quot;L&amp;quot; series! &lt;br&gt; Bill Crocker
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/0bd1216f4e3f6363?show_docid=0bd1216f4e3f6363</guid>
  <author>
  wcrocker...@comcast.net
  (Bill Crocker)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 13:12:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Which Lens?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/a3d8555b7604923b?show_docid=a3d8555b7604923b</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;41385f09$0$29719$afc38...@new s.easynet.co.uk&amp;gt;, Dimitris &lt;br&gt; There&#39;s a reason why the Sigma costs less.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/a3d8555b7604923b?show_docid=a3d8555b7604923b</guid>
  <author>
  r...@nospam.techline.com
  (Randall Ainsworth)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 12:48:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Which Lens?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/a605eb3225fdfd60?show_docid=a605eb3225fdfd60</link>
  <description>
  It would be worth saving for the IS version (70-200 f/2.8 L IS). &lt;br&gt; Roger
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/a605eb3225fdfd60?show_docid=a605eb3225fdfd60</guid>
  <author>
  usern...@qwest.net
  (Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark))
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 12:30:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Which Lens?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/e058c31a9cf7b1d5?show_docid=e058c31a9cf7b1d5</link>
  <description>
  Hello NG, &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m looking for a relatively fast zoom lens for my 10D, trying to decide &lt;br&gt; between the Canon EF 70-200 f4L and the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 EX. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve found both lenses at similar prices (Canon slightly more expensive), &lt;br&gt; and on paper it seems the Sigma is the way to go (as it gives you a couple &lt;br&gt; of f-stops more) but wanted to hear from people who&#39;ve used these lenses and
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/e02745e2b03b12bf/e058c31a9cf7b1d5?show_docid=e058c31a9cf7b1d5</guid>
  <author>
  dimitri_74_nos...@nospam_hotmail.com
  (Dimitris)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 12:09:34 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>75-300: Canon EF-S III USM or Tamron LD Macro?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/0fab63f147505abb/9177ace607d9e9c9?show_docid=9177ace607d9e9c9</link>
  <description>
  Hello! &lt;br&gt; Please help me making a choice: &lt;br&gt; What should I buy for my EOS 300D? &lt;br&gt; A) Canon EF-S 75-300 III USM &lt;br&gt; or &lt;br&gt; 2) Tamron AF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 LD Macro Autofocus &lt;br&gt; ? &lt;br&gt; Pro/Cons? &lt;br&gt; Moreover, I&#39;d like to add either an EF-12 or an EF-25, &lt;br&gt; what difference is there between the two? Maybe they are &lt;br&gt; discountinued, since I cannot find their specifications.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/0fab63f147505abb/9177ace607d9e9c9?show_docid=9177ace607d9e9c9</guid>
  <author>
  and...@invalid.com
  (Andrea)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 09:56:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>FA: Bogen Tripod &amp; Head</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/d45f312704f8d595/4a2c14a5f66b0bbf?show_docid=4a2c14a5f66b0bbf</link>
  <description>
  For Auction - Near Mint with Low Reserve: &lt;br&gt; Bogen Manfrotto 3221WN Wilderness Black Tripod &amp;amp; 3030 Pan/Tilt Head &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;item=3837744788&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Thanks for looking.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/d45f312704f8d595/4a2c14a5f66b0bbf?show_docid=4a2c14a5f66b0bbf</guid>
  <author>
  tomc7...@spamcomcast.net
  (Tom C.)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 01:54:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>need heat absorbing filter info</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/06b2a37488783b1d/8d16b1950ee9ba03?show_docid=8d16b1950ee9ba03</link>
  <description>
  Can someone help me with some specific information I need concerning the &lt;br&gt; heat absorbing filter used in Kodak slide projectors, or failing that, the &lt;br&gt; heat absorbing filters used in enlargers? &lt;br&gt; I need to know the infrared cutoff wavelength of these. I suspect that &lt;br&gt; these are basicly a &amp;quot;low pass&amp;quot; filter for all UV and visual wavelengths, but
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/06b2a37488783b1d/8d16b1950ee9ba03?show_docid=8d16b1950ee9ba03</guid>
  <author>
  jb...@cfw.com
  (Jim)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:56:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Identify pl filter</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/14a3b9adb64720db/3d48935e14c72526?show_docid=3d48935e14c72526</link>
  <description>
  This is the only article in this thread &lt;br&gt; View: Original Format &lt;br&gt; Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I am new to the filter and lens. Hope I can get good advices here. &lt;br&gt; I went to ebay and got a set of used filters for my digital camera. &lt;br&gt; There &lt;br&gt; is one Hoya PL lens. I doubt it is linear pl, but not sure. Does
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/14a3b9adb64720db/3d48935e14c72526?show_docid=3d48935e14c72526</guid>
  <author>
  dudleydori...@yahoo.com
  (John McGraw)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 07:38:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Please take a look at this auction and give us your opinion</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/51eb774cbd29971c/7fa1cb2dc8ffbd38?show_docid=7fa1cb2dc8ffbd38</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;item=3835041276&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; If you would like to vote in the poll which is described in the addition to &lt;br&gt; the auction description, &lt;br&gt; please send an email to me at rwood54...@yahoo.com and put either YES or NO &lt;br&gt; in &lt;br&gt; the email subject header. YES means &amp;quot;stop the auction&amp;quot;. NO means &amp;quot;let the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/51eb774cbd29971c/7fa1cb2dc8ffbd38?show_docid=7fa1cb2dc8ffbd38</guid>
  <author>
  rw54...@cox.net
  (BW)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2004 17:50:06 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Second/additional lenses (and general advice) for digital rebel</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/245e078283a9a9f2/8360eee154a454e1?show_docid=8360eee154a454e1</link>
  <description>
  Since you already have the 18-55mm range covered, you might want to &lt;br&gt; cover the 70-200 mm range with 70-200 F/4 L USM or go with its big &lt;br&gt; brother 70-200 F/2.8 L USM. to extend the capabilities of the camera &lt;br&gt; and photographer first, and then back fill with a 16-35 F/2.8 for &lt;br&gt; more low light performance and smaller Depth of Fields, and finally
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/245e078283a9a9f2/8360eee154a454e1?show_docid=8360eee154a454e1</guid>
  <author>
  mitchal...@aol.com
  (Mitch Alsup)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:04:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Second/additional lenses (and general advice) for digital rebel</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/245e078283a9a9f2/43ce6a4bf3557550?show_docid=43ce6a4bf3557550</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;24db3d1e.0408100556.69b7e...@ posting.google.com&amp;gt;, Peter Wang &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;misterw...@gmail.com&amp;gt; writes &lt;br&gt; I find this surprising - many people find true macro work much more &lt;br&gt; difficult. Maybe you have not got close enough yet to realise how hard &lt;br&gt; it gets! &lt;br&gt; I have a 10D, so very similar in needs to your 300D, and have a similar
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/245e078283a9a9f2/43ce6a4bf3557550?show_docid=43ce6a4bf3557550</guid>
  <author>
  da...@nospam.demon.co.uk
  (David Littlewood)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:19:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Second/additional lenses (and general advice) for digital rebel</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/245e078283a9a9f2/576d66bd8783e7c7?show_docid=576d66bd8783e7c7</link>
  <description>
  Hi everyone, &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m getting a digital rebel 300D and I&#39;m shopping around for a second &lt;br&gt; lens. I&#39;ve done some light 35mm SLR work in the past, and mostly have &lt;br&gt; been working on improving my framing and composition with a digital &lt;br&gt; Elph S230 over the past few years &lt;br&gt; (&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.electrictao.net/gallery/portfolio&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;). I like landscape,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/245e078283a9a9f2/576d66bd8783e7c7?show_docid=576d66bd8783e7c7</guid>
  <author>
  misterw...@gmail.com
  (Peter Wang)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:56:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Saddam Hussein Found hanging in Jail Cell</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/569ddfaa394a52b4/12a4128066db8ead?show_docid=12a4128066db8ead</link>
  <description>
  &amp;quot;Arthur Small&amp;quot; &amp;lt;asma...@nycap.rr.com&amp;gt; wrote in news:haLRc.101040 &lt;br&gt; $yd5.32...@twister.nyroc.rr.co m: &lt;br&gt; Trojan Horse. There have been other posts, including one using &lt;br&gt; Arnold Schwartzenegger&#39;s name. All of them are designed to put &lt;br&gt; some pretty nasty code on your computer.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/569ddfaa394a52b4/12a4128066db8ead?show_docid=12a4128066db8ead</guid>
  <author>
  springstspamt...@diespammer.net
  (Woodard R. Springstube)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 02:17:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Saddam Hussein Found hanging in Jail Cell</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/569ddfaa394a52b4/3b4e7f142a1f9a52?show_docid=3b4e7f142a1f9a52</link>
  <description>
  Yes, and most often, they are right. &lt;br&gt; Sigh.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/569ddfaa394a52b4/3b4e7f142a1f9a52?show_docid=3b4e7f142a1f9a52</guid>
  <author>
  rphun...@charter.net
  (Ron Hunter)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2004 16:57:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Saddam Hussein Found hanging in Jail Cell</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/569ddfaa394a52b4/0d3e599fa5f63fcb?show_docid=0d3e599fa5f63fcb</link>
  <description>
  I haven&#39;t bothered to look at the attachment. It&#39;s no doubt malicious in &lt;br&gt; some way, why do people bother, do they assume ng readers are stupid. &lt;br&gt; Dave Cohen
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/569ddfaa394a52b4/0d3e599fa5f63fcb?show_docid=0d3e599fa5f63fcb</guid>
  <author>
  u...@example.net
  (Dave Cohen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2004 14:29:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Saddam Hussein Found hanging in Jail Cell</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/569ddfaa394a52b4/45c6be2489c59f26?show_docid=45c6be2489c59f26</link>
  <description>
  sh
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/569ddfaa394a52b4/45c6be2489c59f26?show_docid=45c6be2489c59f26</guid>
  <author>
  fr...@fshe2fs.com
  (Frank ess)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2004 14:24:32 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Saddam Hussein Found hanging in Jail Cell</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/569ddfaa394a52b4/5eb603dde2d0f58e?show_docid=5eb603dde2d0f58e</link>
  <description>
  Only you have the story. Not CNN or the wire services.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/569ddfaa394a52b4/5eb603dde2d0f58e?show_docid=5eb603dde2d0f58e</guid>
  <author>
  asma...@nycap.rr.com
  (Arthur Small)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2004 13:41:33 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Light meter - i am a new user , please suggest the light meter suitable for me</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/ca606cea8b105a3b/a6349b4c034b5205?show_docid=a6349b4c034b5205</link>
  <description>
  The old Gossen Luna Pro was the standard for a long while and Gossens &lt;br&gt; are well thought of. But a spot meter is really a more specialized &lt;br&gt; animal and is used pretty heavily by Ansel Adams/Fred Picknose &lt;br&gt; purists. I&#39;d start with a less expensive one and keep it as a backup &lt;br&gt; when you get more advanced.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/ca606cea8b105a3b/a6349b4c034b5205?show_docid=a6349b4c034b5205</guid>
  <author>
  larboar...@hotmail.com
  (Ted Azito)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 22:07:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Braun 370BVC</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/d0de186fe31191be/5dbece329bbdd26d?show_docid=5dbece329bbdd26d</link>
  <description>
  I am looking for a copy of the user manual for the Braun 370BVC strobe. If &lt;br&gt; any one has a line on this item I would appreciate hearing from you. &lt;br&gt; delete the removeSpam &lt;br&gt; bobbyremoveS...@wolfgrafx.com
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/d0de186fe31191be/5dbece329bbdd26d?show_docid=5dbece329bbdd26d</guid>
  <author>
  bobbyremoves...@wolfgrafx.com
  (Bobby)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2004 19:02:25 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Arnold Schwarzenegger Commits Suicide</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/ac8cef1bfdf0c8bb/edd7179cb6ee274b?show_docid=edd7179cb6ee274b</link>
  <description>
  Warning! This a link to a virus program
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/ac8cef1bfdf0c8bb/edd7179cb6ee274b?show_docid=edd7179cb6ee274b</guid>
  <author>
  shutter...@houston.rr.com
  (Shutterbug)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2004 02:37:35 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Macro Zoom for Nikon FE</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/7169a490ca5d1c6a/11ce529010d7a465?show_docid=11ce529010d7a465</link>
  <description>
  Can someone recommend a good Macro Zoom Lens for Nikon FE? &lt;br&gt; Thanks, &lt;br&gt; Mike.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/7169a490ca5d1c6a/11ce529010d7a465?show_docid=11ce529010d7a465</guid>
  <author>
  m_d_beger_1...@yahoo.com
  (Mike - EMAIL IGNORED)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2004 21:33:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Shutter Jam.. thinks it is waiting for pic to be taken</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/db5308849b42cb21/1b54842d24e49d99?show_docid=1b54842d24e49d99</link>
  <description>
  MEs are brilliant cameras ,first,check the batteries.If the mirror is locked &lt;br&gt; up,the batteries would be flat very quickly.If that doesnt solve it,Im &lt;br&gt; sure a decent photo dealer could sort it out quickly.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/db5308849b42cb21/1b54842d24e49d99?show_docid=1b54842d24e49d99</guid>
  <author>
  neil.rasmus...@btopenworld.com
  (Neil Rasmussen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2004 19:40:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Wanted: Person with experience building a studio in Southern California</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/6c27f0c30f3fa726/fe364eccf1ba6121?show_docid=fe364eccf1ba6121</link>
  <description>
  If you have experience in building a photo studio, and are located in &lt;br&gt; the Southern California area, please contact me. &lt;br&gt; James Fabin
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/6c27f0c30f3fa726/fe364eccf1ba6121?show_docid=fe364eccf1ba6121</guid>
  <author>
  jamesfa...@gmail.com
  (James Fabin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:55:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Help building a photo studio</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/18d8f9586c672471/9d47f3670f6680f8?show_docid=9d47f3670f6680f8</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m located in Southern California and am looking to build a studio &lt;br&gt; for photographing cars. I&#39;m looking for anyone with experience, or &lt;br&gt; advice on building such a studio. I&#39;m considering having a 40&#39; x 30&#39; &lt;br&gt; cyclorama with a 20&#39; ceiling, with proper lighting for vehicles. In &lt;br&gt; addition, there would be one or two sets built for other use, as well
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/18d8f9586c672471/9d47f3670f6680f8?show_docid=9d47f3670f6680f8</guid>
  <author>
  jamesfa...@gmail.com
  (James Fabin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:53:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Christina Aguilera naked</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/92f4965a3c957336/23da08382aa221c6?show_docid=23da08382aa221c6</link>
  <description>
  Cancelled because of virus: Backdoor.Hackarmy.gen
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/92f4965a3c957336/23da08382aa221c6?show_docid=23da08382aa221c6</guid>
  <author>
  xjkkv...@vijjttuy.com
  (joe)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:33:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: flash for N880</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/6cac5ad3aa995bc8/488ef83d59269ef3?show_docid=488ef83d59269ef3</link>
  <description>
  Ted wrote: &lt;br&gt; Get a used SB-25/26/28(DX)/80/800 off Ebay. They&#39;ll work in all modes, &lt;br&gt; including matrix-balanced fill flash with monitor preflash. &lt;br&gt; -Tudor.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/6cac5ad3aa995bc8/488ef83d59269ef3?show_docid=488ef83d59269ef3</guid>
  <author>
  tudorb-aqh...@frelllling.net
  (Tudor Bosman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:42:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: filter/lens protection for Nikon D70 18-70 standard Kit lens</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/7ffe5b3fdf2588a7/b8d6345f48cbba20?show_docid=b8d6345f48cbba20</link>
  <description>
  Mals wrote: &lt;br&gt; Just remember that a polariser only really deepens the sky colour at 90 &lt;br&gt; degrees to the sun and with wide angle lenses you can end up with an &lt;br&gt; uneven sky because the lens is catching more that just the part of the &lt;br&gt; sky that is at 90 degrees to the sun. And you will loose a stop or more.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/7ffe5b3fdf2588a7/b8d6345f48cbba20?show_docid=b8d6345f48cbba20</guid>
  <author>
  u...@nospam.please
  (user@nospam.please)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:26:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Arnold Schwarzenegger Commits Suicide</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/8cf846d22e86d05c/dcd1a0d43512fa21?show_docid=dcd1a0d43512fa21</link>
  <description>
  jason.da...@harvard.edu wrote in &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=x4vMc.104251$od7.67832@pd7tw3no:&quot;&gt;news:x4vMc.104251$od7.67832@pd7tw3no:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Re: Arnold Schwarzenegger Commits Suicide &lt;br&gt; And your sister gives good head (she swallows!) while being fisting your &lt;br&gt; mother at the same time...
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/8cf846d22e86d05c/dcd1a0d43512fa21?show_docid=dcd1a0d43512fa21</guid>
  <author>
  txcrui...@iwon.com
  (Bobo Cruz)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:16:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Arnold Schwarzenegger Commits Suicide</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/8cf846d22e86d05c/d6970d103cec7cf7?show_docid=d6970d103cec7cf7</link>
  <description>
  don&#39;t fall for it &#39;news.*&#39; reports it as a virus &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=x4vMc.104251$od7.67832@pd7tw3no&quot;&gt;news:x4vMc.104251$od7.67832@pd7tw3no&lt;/a&gt;... &lt;br&gt; from the large oak tree in his Californian garden. In a suicide note &lt;br&gt; found at the scene he tells of his sordid sex life and lack of will to &lt;br&gt; live. A copy of the suicide note which was found by journalists has been
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/8cf846d22e86d05c/d6970d103cec7cf7?show_docid=d6970d103cec7cf7</guid>
  <author>
  (Steve Young)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2004 15:59:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Identify pl filter</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/f04695daa00e1c51/68dd8a196373b58f?show_docid=68dd8a196373b58f</link>
  <description>
  I am new to the filter and lens. Hope I can get good advices here. &lt;br&gt; I went to ebay and got a set of used filters for my digital camera. There &lt;br&gt; is one Hoya PL lens. I doubt it is linear pl, but not sure. Does that &lt;br&gt; matter for digital camera if it is not cir-pl? Also, how do I tell it is &lt;br&gt; standard or double coated lens without the retail package?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/f04695daa00e1c51/68dd8a196373b58f?show_docid=68dd8a196373b58f</guid>
  <author>
  (jaimie)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 21:29:58 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Osama Found Hanged</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/9c39a238ef017d5e/ea475f25d28ece04?show_docid=ea475f25d28ece04</link>
  <description>
  If one takes into account the number of wives and numerous offspring, &lt;br&gt; one can&#39;t help but conclude he is indeed truly well hung. &lt;br&gt; Dave Cohen
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/9c39a238ef017d5e/ea475f25d28ece04?show_docid=ea475f25d28ece04</guid>
  <author>
  u...@example.net
  (Dave Cohen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:26:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: filter/lens protection for Nikon D70 18-70 standard Kit lens</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/7ffe5b3fdf2588a7/0bec0e9e4924def6?show_docid=0bec0e9e4924def6</link>
  <description>
  to &lt;br&gt; Sky color is easily adjusted digitally. In fact, you can do a much better &lt;br&gt; job than a C/P filter.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment/browse_frm/thread/7ffe5b3fdf2588a7/0bec0e9e4924def6?show_docid=0bec0e9e4924def6</guid>
  <author>
  christophercampbellnos...@hotmail.com
  (C J Campbell)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 04:33:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
