Calvin Sambrook wrote:
> SI FAV Alan Browne 2.jpg: Hmm, it's technically great but it's not
> really grabbing me. Sorry.
I'm not esp. thrilled myself, but I will revisit macro composition as
soon as I can. I'd probably add some coloured lighting and arrange the
"bits' in a more geometrically pleasing way.
> SI Fav Alan Browne 3.jpg: Now this, on the other hand, is technically
> great and does grab me. The composition, texture colour, detail, all
> work to pull me in.
Thanks. It's a variation on a shot I did a few years ago for the SI -
same species of leaf as well. In the recent shot it is near 1:1, but as
the leaf was curled, impossible to get it all in focus. The shot is
about a 1/4 crop of the original. And rotated to make that dominant
diagonal and "tributary" complements. (IOW: I saved the shot in photoshop).
The SI shot from a few years ago ...
http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/25250889/original
Here I had a red transparency under it and used a lightbox as the light
source.
> SI Fav Alan Browne 4.jpg: Wonderful. Again it's got composition (not
> textbook and it wouldn't work for many shots but it works here), texture
> colour, interest. I can feel my eyes exploring it in detail without
> wandering off elsewhere. Terrific.
Thanks, yet, it's a failed effort! I was impatiently waiting for a
massive gust of wind to move leaves around for this 6 second exposure.
Alas, I only got some little blasts of air and so there are a few leaves
in motion but they hardly show. The shadow lines from the trees help
"recover" the effort at least.