Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
SI favourites comments by Calvin Sambrook
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 26 - 30 of 30 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals) < Older 
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Alan Browne  
View profile  
 More options Oct 29, 10:53 am
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm
From: Alan Browne <alan.bro...@FreelunchVideotron.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:53:51 -0400
Local: Thurs, Oct 29 2009 10:53 am
Subject: Re: SI favourites comments by Calvin Sambrook

Calvin Sambrook wrote:
> Isn't it amazing how deeply buried in our brains the reading-direction
> is! It's a useful trick to remember that if you want to give the brain
> an easy time or support a feeling of completeness or calmness then
> having the subject looking to the right helps.  On the other hand having
> the subject looking left adds tension which might of course be just what
> you want in another shot.

I've always referred to the left looking subject (from viewers
viewpoint) as "reflective, contemplative" - looking to the past.

Right looking from the viewers perspective as "forward, acting,
anticipating, leading" - looking to the future.

With that in mind, look at some magazine covers.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Frank ess  
View profile  
 More options Oct 29, 11:10 am
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm
From: "Frank ess" <fr...@fshe2fs.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:10:53 -0700
Local: Thurs, Oct 29 2009 11:10 am
Subject: Re: SI favourites comments by Calvin Sambrook

I hadn't thought about this kind of thing in those terms; when setting
up the display cases for my 1:43-scale automobile models, the first
case contained the examples nearest-to-representing cars I'd owned or
had been in my family. They were all angled facing left-to-right at
thirty degrees or so; in the other cases, cars I liked, admired, or
was otherwise especially interested in, came out facing right-to-left,
without a conscious decision ...

--
Frank ess


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Paul Furman  
View profile  
 More options Oct 29, 4:09 pm
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm
From: Paul Furman <pa...@-edgehill.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:09:31 -0700
Local: Thurs, Oct 29 2009 4:09 pm
Subject: Re: SI favourites comments by Calvin Sambrook

I just don't personally like flash. Maybe because I don't know how to
use it :-) Good point though, in cinema, they could go from a dreamy HDR
scene with a gigawatt of expensively diffused light manned by a crew of
thirty to a flash photojournalist still and the the impact would be huge.

Thanks again for your insightful comments.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Walter Banks  
View profile  
 More options Oct 29, 5:57 pm
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm
From: Walter Banks <wal...@bytecraft.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:57:11 -0500
Local: Thurs, Oct 29 2009 5:57 pm
Subject: Re: SI favourites comments by Calvin Sambrook

Alan Browne wrote:
> Calvin Sambrook wrote:

> > Isn't it amazing how deeply buried in our brains the reading-direction
> > is! It's a useful trick to remember that if you want to give the brain
> > an easy time or support a feeling of completeness or calmness then
> > having the subject looking to the right helps.  On the other hand having
> > the subject looking left adds tension which might of course be just what
> > you want in another shot.

> I've always referred to the left looking subject (from viewers
> viewpoint) as "reflective, contemplative" - looking to the past.

Her immediate past experience was our living room window
perhaps not her best memory.

Bowser, this thread opens the possibility of a SI theme that focusses
in some way on post processing. I have done very little post processing
limited to cropping, resizing, and some color balance. Post processing
techniques are as important to digital photography as darkroom
skills a generation ago.

Walter..


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alan Browne  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30, 10:34 am
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm
From: Alan Browne <alan.bro...@FreelunchVideotron.ca>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:34:12 -0400
Local: Fri, Oct 30 2009 10:34 am
Subject: Re: SI favourites comments by Calvin Sambrook

Calvin Sambrook wrote:
> SI FAV Alan Browne 2.jpg:  Hmm, it's technically great but it's not
> really grabbing me.  Sorry.

I'm not esp. thrilled myself, but I will revisit macro composition as
soon as I can.  I'd probably add some coloured lighting and arrange the
"bits' in a more geometrically pleasing way.

> SI Fav Alan Browne 3.jpg:  Now this, on the other hand, is technically
> great and does grab me.  The composition, texture colour, detail, all
> work to pull me in.

Thanks.  It's a variation on a shot I did a few years ago for the SI -
same species of leaf as well.  In the recent shot it is near 1:1, but as
the leaf was curled, impossible to get it all in focus.  The shot is
about a 1/4 crop of the original.  And rotated to make that dominant
diagonal and "tributary" complements.  (IOW: I saved the shot in photoshop).

The SI shot from a few years ago ...
http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/25250889/original
Here I had a red transparency under it and used a lightbox as the light
source.

> SI Fav Alan Browne 4.jpg:  Wonderful.  Again it's got composition (not
> textbook and it wouldn't work for many shots but it works here), texture
> colour, interest.  I can feel my eyes exploring it in detail without
> wandering off elsewhere.  Terrific.

Thanks, yet, it's a failed effort!  I was impatiently waiting for a
massive gust of wind to move leaves around for this 6 second exposure.
Alas, I only got some little blasts of air and so there are a few leaves
in motion but they hardly show.  The shadow lines from the trees help
"recover" the effort at least.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages < Older 
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google