Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Cheap underwater bag-style housings -- any good?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Edward A. Falk  
View profile  
 More options Oct 29, 7:01 am
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm
From: f...@green.rahul.net (Edward A. Falk)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:01:28 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Thurs, Oct 29 2009 7:01 am
Subject: Cheap underwater bag-style housings -- any good?
I've been seeing a lot of ads for a "DiCAPac" underwater housing.  It's
basically a robust waterproof plastic bag with a window for the lens
to look through.  It also has a few places for your fingers to reach into
the bag to work the controls.

Just search for it on Google or eBay and you'll find dozens of them.

Does anybody have any experience with this item?  How does it compare
to a full ($$) underwater housing?  I realize that this bag can't
go as deep as the fancier housings.

--
        -Ed Falk, f...@despams.r.us.com
        http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bill Graham  
View profile  
 More options Oct 29, 8:56 am
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm
From: "Bill Graham" <w...@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:56:20 -0700
Local: Thurs, Oct 29 2009 8:56 am
Subject: Re: Cheap underwater bag-style housings -- any good?

"Edward A. Falk" <f...@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:hca7uo$joj$3@blue.rahul.net...

> I've been seeing a lot of ads for a "DiCAPac" underwater housing.  It's
> basically a robust waterproof plastic bag with a window for the lens
> to look through.  It also has a few places for your fingers to reach into
> the bag to work the controls.

> Just search for it on Google or eBay and you'll find dozens of them.

> Does anybody have any experience with this item?  How does it compare
> to a full ($$) underwater housing?  I realize that this bag can't
> go as deep as the fancier housings.

> --
> -Ed Falk, f...@despams.r.us.com
> http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/

I met a photog using one of these on a fishing trip. He said they were great
in heavy rain, or in situations where you might get doused with water. (like
on a fishing trip) But he wouldn't use one to actually go beneath the water
with anything like an expensive camera)

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bowser  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30, 1:18 am
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm
From: Bowser <Ca...@Nikon.Panny>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:18:14 -0400
Local: Fri, Oct 30 2009 1:18 am
Subject: Re: Cheap underwater bag-style housings -- any good?
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:01:28 +0000 (UTC), f...@green.rahul.net (Edward

A. Falk) wrote:
>I've been seeing a lot of ads for a "DiCAPac" underwater housing.  It's
>basically a robust waterproof plastic bag with a window for the lens
>to look through.  It also has a few places for your fingers to reach into
>the bag to work the controls.

>Just search for it on Google or eBay and you'll find dozens of them.

>Does anybody have any experience with this item?  How does it compare
>to a full ($$) underwater housing?  I realize that this bag can't
>go as deep as the fancier housings.

I tried on for a P&S camera I have, and it was worthless. Holding the
cam in place while in the water was impossble and feeling the controls
through the thick plastic was also impossible. Don't waste your money.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Edward A. Falk  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30, 8:43 pm
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm
From: f...@green.rahul.net (Edward A. Falk)
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:43:24 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Fri, Oct 30 2009 8:43 pm
Subject: Re: Cheap underwater bag-style housings -- any good?
In article <ov8je5pj8jpvocrclvdcrgjsbamjl66...@4ax.com>,

Bowser  <Ca...@Nikon.Panny> wrote:

>I tried on for a P&S camera I have, and it was worthless. Holding the
>cam in place while in the water was impossble and feeling the controls
>through the thick plastic was also impossible. Don't waste your money.

Thanks for your input everybody.  I guess the votes are in.  I'll save my
money for a real housing.

--
        -Ed Falk, f...@despams.r.us.com
        http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google