<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>rec.photo.digital Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital</link>
  <description>Digital cameras, scanners, printers, software, PhotoCD.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>herrenmode kaufen hemden herrenbekleidung bestellen grosse herrenmode kaufen der 50er herrenbekleidung bestellen grosse groessen joop herrenbekleidung bestellen</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/e99cf5286dee64a5/7ddec9e3717c8c1e?show_docid=7ddec9e3717c8c1e</link>
  <description>
  herrenmode kaufen hemden herrenbekleidung bestellen grosse herrenmode &lt;br&gt; kaufen der 50er herrenbekleidung bestellen grosse groessen joop &lt;br&gt; herrenbekleidung bestellen &lt;br&gt; + &lt;br&gt; + &lt;br&gt; + &lt;br&gt; +++ MAENNERKLEIDUNG KAUFEN +++ MAENNERKLEIDUNG ONLINE BESTELLEN +++ &lt;br&gt; + &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://WWW.MAENNERKLEIDUNG-KAUFEN-24.INFO&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://WWW.MAENNERKLEIDUNG-KAUFEN-24.INFO&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/e99cf5286dee64a5/7ddec9e3717c8c1e?show_docid=7ddec9e3717c8c1e</guid>
  <author>
  missbee...@googlemail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:49:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 18m 10mm?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/278d92bd1763bffb/3921add4728eeba5?show_docid=3921add4728eeba5</link>
  <description>
  In message &amp;lt;_u6dnaKBufHG3BzVnZ2dnUVZ_hnin ...@comcast.com&amp;gt;, Neil &lt;br&gt; Harrington &amp;lt;n...@home.today&amp;gt; writes &lt;br&gt; Also misused by ALL the photography magazines I see and all the web &lt;br&gt; sites selling lenses &lt;br&gt; Neil, do you just argue for the sake of it? You have started several &lt;br&gt; arguments recently where you have argued that you are right despite
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/278d92bd1763bffb/3921add4728eeba5?show_docid=3921add4728eeba5</guid>
  <author>
  ch...@phaedsys.org
  (Chris H)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:26:23 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Irfanview freeware bug? Batch JPEG lossless autorotation. Large directory failure consistent</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/afb330e366c3f5e2/20ad56d1cc15409d?show_docid=20ad56d1cc15409d</link>
  <description>
  [] &lt;br&gt; Yes, I used to think like that as well, Ron. Still prefer it. These &lt;br&gt; days, though, I am more somewhat likely to accept that what I have to hand &lt;br&gt; is a full earlier version, and I would require Internet access to do a &lt;br&gt; re-install of the current version. Operating systems and their security &lt;br&gt; updates are one obvious example.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/afb330e366c3f5e2/20ad56d1cc15409d?show_docid=20ad56d1cc15409d</guid>
  <author>
  david-tay...@blueyonder.neither-this-bit.nor-this-bit.co.uk
  (David J Taylor)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:59:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Irfanview freeware bug? Batch JPEG lossless autorotation. Large directory failure consistent</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/afb330e366c3f5e2/94f3d12f693b9567?show_docid=94f3d12f693b9567</link>
  <description>
  On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:45:12 -0400 &#39;t...@mucks.net&#39; &lt;br&gt; wrote this on alt.comp.freeware: &lt;br&gt; Disingenuous. See my previous comments.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/afb330e366c3f5e2/94f3d12f693b9567?show_docid=94f3d12f693b9567</guid>
  <author>
  hummingb...@127.0.0.1
  (hummingbird)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:41:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Irfanview freeware bug? Batch JPEG lossless autorotation. Large directory failure consistent</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/afb330e366c3f5e2/02c480af2eb06aab?show_docid=02c480af2eb06aab</link>
  <description>
  On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:50:27 -0400 &#39;t...@mucks.net&#39; &lt;br&gt; wrote this on alt.comp.freeware: &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ll leave you to comment on the efficacy of Trend Micro: &lt;br&gt; see chart: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.nruns.com/_en/aps/press.php&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; ...but I wasn&#39;t asking you to accept my word, but the word of &lt;br&gt; ~22 other latest scanners. You might also like to read several
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/afb330e366c3f5e2/02c480af2eb06aab?show_docid=02c480af2eb06aab</guid>
  <author>
  hummingb...@127.0.0.1
  (hummingbird)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:39:34 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 18m 10mm?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/278d92bd1763bffb/aea07306ff0dd844?show_docid=aea07306ff0dd844</link>
  <description>
  Not quite. The language of the majority is defined by the language of &lt;br&gt; the majority. We can however choose whether or not to behave like most &lt;br&gt; other people. If our choice is to be intelligent and rational rather &lt;br&gt; than like the majority we are likely to find an intelligent and &lt;br&gt; reasonable minority who will both understand and appreciate our use of
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/278d92bd1763bffb/aea07306ff0dd844?show_docid=aea07306ff0dd844</guid>
  <author>
  c...@holyrood.ed.ac.uk
  (Chris Malcolm)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:31:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [OT] Re: 40D CAUGHT IN A STAREDOWN!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/af62f272aaae0bdb/9d5085f0c525a90c?show_docid=9d5085f0c525a90c</link>
  <description>
  My comments are based on the charter of the groups. Aus.Photo does not &lt;br&gt; have a charter but I would presume by the name it is the only group of &lt;br&gt; the three being cross posted to where photographs are the &amp;quot;specific&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; nature of the group. &lt;br&gt; I have yet to figure out why people post their photos - for comment or
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/af62f272aaae0bdb/9d5085f0c525a90c?show_docid=9d5085f0c525a90c</guid>
  <author>
  2sq...@pacific-ocean.com
  (2SQUID)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:14:11 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Canon 40D and 5D vs. Nikon D40 and D300</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/ddb4913e452bacef/0549342bcf72c20d?show_docid=0549342bcf72c20d</link>
  <description>
  There&#39;s also those ambitious folk who buy a DSLR and shoot in manual &lt;br&gt; mode because they&#39;ve been told that&#39;s how you get the best results, &lt;br&gt; but unfortunately all their exposures are way off. Rather like those &lt;br&gt; folk who get a manual gear shift car for the first time and complain &lt;br&gt; after having driven hundreds of miles in second gear.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/ddb4913e452bacef/0549342bcf72c20d?show_docid=0549342bcf72c20d</guid>
  <author>
  c...@holyrood.ed.ac.uk
  (Chris Malcolm)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:26:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Irfanview freeware bug? Batch JPEG lossless autorotation. Large directory failure consistent</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/afb330e366c3f5e2/98dbddc4bcda13d9?show_docid=98dbddc4bcda13d9</link>
  <description>
  Google does ALL their installs that way (extra download), which is &lt;br&gt; another reason that I don&#39;t use much of their free software, with the &lt;br&gt; exception of GoogleEarth. I like to have the complete download in my &lt;br&gt; archives so I can reinstall without downloading again.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/afb330e366c3f5e2/98dbddc4bcda13d9?show_docid=98dbddc4bcda13d9</guid>
  <author>
  rphun...@charter.net
  (Ron Hunter)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:25:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Going Down With The D3!!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/ddb277d6b938b0a6/1050a8dc7a96444d?show_docid=1050a8dc7a96444d</link>
  <description>
  I was told that you have gone down on everything except for the Titanic!!!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/ddb277d6b938b0a6/1050a8dc7a96444d?show_docid=1050a8dc7a96444d</guid>
  <author>
  lewzeelas...@nospamyahoo.com
  (Lewzeelastik)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:23:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Irfanview freeware bug? Batch JPEG lossless autorotation. Large directory failure consistent</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/afb330e366c3f5e2/8d751a3bc141a9fe?show_docid=8d751a3bc141a9fe</link>
  <description>
  Yeah, that happens sometimes, and IS ILLEGAL in some states, this one, &lt;br&gt; for instance!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/afb330e366c3f5e2/8d751a3bc141a9fe?show_docid=8d751a3bc141a9fe</guid>
  <author>
  rphun...@charter.net
  (Ron Hunter)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:22:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Irfanview freeware bug? Batch JPEG lossless autorotation. Large directory failure consistent</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/afb330e366c3f5e2/2e660263d3120cbd?show_docid=2e660263d3120cbd</link>
  <description>
  NO, it makes ME groan because unrequested software is included, with a &lt;br&gt; default of &#39;install&#39;. It is annoying. Rather like inviting an old &lt;br&gt; friend to a party, only to find he has brought several of his friends &lt;br&gt; (whom you don&#39;t like) along.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/afb330e366c3f5e2/2e660263d3120cbd?show_docid=2e660263d3120cbd</guid>
  <author>
  rphun...@charter.net
  (Ron Hunter)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:21:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The Joy of Pixel Density</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/2371216c7cc397ef/63272e14c21799a2?show_docid=63272e14c21799a2</link>
  <description>
  Which suggests that you /do/ care about the pixel density.... &lt;br&gt; David
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/2371216c7cc397ef/63272e14c21799a2?show_docid=63272e14c21799a2</guid>
  <author>
  david-tay...@blueyonder.neither-this-bit.nor-this-bit.co.uk
  (David J Taylor)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:16:59 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The Joy of Pixel Density</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/2371216c7cc397ef/0f5c12af88839d4d?show_docid=0f5c12af88839d4d</link>
  <description>
  This isn&#39;t exactly the case. That source follower is an amplifier, but &lt;br&gt; it&#39;s amplifying the current, not the voltage. As it happens, that&#39;s &lt;br&gt; pretty much equivalent. The charge/voltage gain is supplied by the &lt;br&gt; capacitance, as Eric explained. However, since it still only contains &lt;br&gt; the photo (and shot noise) electrons, it&#39;s ability to drive the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/2371216c7cc397ef/0f5c12af88839d4d?show_docid=0f5c12af88839d4d</guid>
  <author>
  bob.csx...@gmail.com
  (Bob Newman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:49:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The Joy of Pixel Density</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/2371216c7cc397ef/02c86fe8c42c0d3d?show_docid=02c86fe8c42c0d3d</link>
  <description>
  6MP. &lt;br&gt; Duh.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.digital/browse_thread/thread/2371216c7cc397ef/02c86fe8c42c0d3d?show_docid=02c86fe8c42c0d3d</guid>
  <author>
  rfisc...@sonic.net
  (Ray Fischer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:48:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
