Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Portrait lighting using compact camera's flash
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  9 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
jones  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 3:54 am
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
From: jones <nom...@mail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:54:44 GMT
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 3:54 am
Subject: Portrait lighting using compact camera's flash
It's a long story but I need to take some indoors portrait and full
length pictures using someone's compact camera.

Other than the ambient lighting in the room, all I will have is the
compact's own tiny flash.

I was thinking of getting a basic standalone flash and firing it
using a light-sensitive trigger.  What sort of cost is a basic flash
trigger for that sort of job?

Is there any ingenious way to block the direct light from the camera
flash hitting my subject but still let the light trigger the
standalone flash.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
tony cooper  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 4:07 am
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
From: tony cooper <tony_cooper...@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:07:11 -0500
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 4:07 am
Subject: Re: Portrait lighting using compact camera's flash

On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:54:44 GMT, jones <nom...@mail.com> wrote:
>It's a long story but I need to take some indoors portrait and full
>length pictures using someone's compact camera.

>Other than the ambient lighting in the room, all I will have is the
>compact's own tiny flash.

>I was thinking of getting a basic standalone flash and firing it
>using a light-sensitive trigger.  What sort of cost is a basic flash
>trigger for that sort of job?

>Is there any ingenious way to block the direct light from the camera
>flash hitting my subject but still let the light trigger the
>standalone flash.

Unless you have other uses for the flash, why not just pick up some
clip-on utility lights from Home Depot and illuminate the area?  Four
lights, as shown here <
http://hubsphotographytips.blogspot.com/2008/09/cheap-photo-studio.html

>  Much cheaper than a new flash, and something with future uses.

If the light needs to be diffused, just hang a piece of lightweight
cloth over each one.  Make sure you don't leave the lights on long
enough to start the cloth burning, though.

Combined with room lighting, you might have a white balance problem.
That's correctable in most post-processing programs.

--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jeremiah DeWitt Weiner  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 4:19 am
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
From: Jeremiah DeWitt Weiner <j...@panix.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 17:19:57 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 4:19 am
Subject: Re: Portrait lighting using compact camera's flash

jones <nom...@mail.com> wrote:
> I was thinking of getting a basic standalone flash and firing it
> using a light-sensitive trigger.  What sort of cost is a basic flash
> trigger for that sort of job?

        There are various "peanut" and hot-shoe optical slave triggers
available from Wein and other manufacturers.  I think they usually go
for about $20.

> Is there any ingenious way to block the direct light from the camera
> flash hitting my subject but still let the light trigger the
> standalone flash.

        Sure - use a bit of aluminum foil or white card to deflect the light
from the built-in flash sideways or something.  The slave triggers are
pretty sensitive _if_ everything is happy working together.  (I had
endless problems with my optical slaves until I discovered that they
really hated being under-volted by even a tiny bit.  Proper voltage and
they were happy.)

--
Oh to have a lodge in some vast wilderness.  Where rumors of oppression
and deceit, of unsuccessful and successful wars may never reach me
anymore.  
        -- William Cowper, 1731 - 1800


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Frank ess  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 6:32 am
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
From: "Frank ess" <fr...@fshe2fs.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:32:10 -0800
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 6:32 am
Subject: Re: Portrait lighting using compact camera's flash

I have a couple of small flashes that operate as either straight or
slaves. At one function I used a nikon CP5000 camera with a little
built-in flash, and held one of the slave-mode flashes up and to the
side. It never failed to be triggered by the on-camera thing, and
almost overwhelmed the light from that one. Decent results that way,
although it might have been improved in a static set-up.

Seems to me it was a Vivitar DF200, or something like that. Wonder
where it has got to ...

--
Frank ess


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Chris Malcolm  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 3:38 am
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
From: Chris Malcolm <c...@holyrood.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 7 Nov 2009 16:38:23 GMT
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 3:38 am
Subject: Re: Portrait lighting using compact camera's flash
Jeremiah DeWitt Weiner <j...@panix.com> wrote:

> jones <nom...@mail.com> wrote:
>> I was thinking of getting a basic standalone flash and firing it
>> using a light-sensitive trigger.  What sort of cost is a basic flash
>> trigger for that sort of job?
>    There are various "peanut" and hot-shoe optical slave triggers
> available from Wein and other manufacturers.  I think they usually go
> for about $20.

But those will only work if you turn off both the red eye reduction
pre-flash and the metering pre-flash in the compact camera. I suspect
few compact cameras permit you to turn off the metering pre-flash. In
which case you'd have to get one of the more expensive kinds of
optical trigger which is capable of ignoring the appropriate number
of pre-flashes.

--
Chris Malcolm


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
J. Clarke  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 4:40 am
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
From: "J. Clarke" <jclarke.use...@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:40:34 -0500
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 4:40 am
Subject: Re: Portrait lighting using compact camera's flash

FWIW, the Wein Peanut Slave Digital goes for 35 bucks or 3 for 75--I'd buy
it somewhere where I could try it though unless I had specific feedback from
someone with the same model of camera as I had--it works fine with my FZ20,
but doesn't work with my Coolpix 990 for example.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
nospam  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 5:06 am
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
From: nospam <nos...@nospam.invalid>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:06:40 -0800
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 5:06 am
Subject: Re: Portrait lighting using compact camera's flash
In article <hd4cjf11...@news3.newsguy.com>, J. Clarke

there's no preflash on a coolpix 990 so any slave will work, or just
use a sync cord.

for cameras that use a preflash, there are slaves that are compatible.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Educationg Trolls Is An Endless Task  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 5:44 am
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
From: Educationg Trolls Is An Endless Task <eti...@somewhere.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:44:08 -0600
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 5:44 am
Subject: Re: Portrait lighting using compact camera's flash
On 7 Nov 2009 16:38:23 GMT, Chris Malcolm <c...@holyrood.ed.ac.uk> wrote:

WRONG. You fuckingly useless troll. Stop handing out advice for which you
have no knowledge. You're wasting the time of people far more valuable than
your pathetically inexperienced and ignorance-filled life will ever be.
Unless you have FIRST-HAND knowledge of what you speak, keep your ignorant
and inexperienced "suspicions" and assumptions to yourself.

Many P&S cameras have manual flash modes with no pre-flash events. If there
is a Manual mode on their P&S camera, chances are very high that it also is
equipped with a manual flash setting, often having 3 or more different
fixed-output levels.

And here's one of those "more expensive" slaves that handle cameras that
don't have manual flash modes. With a very nice tilting bracket that allows
you to angle any inexpensive (or expensive) flash unit for bounce-flash
lighting.

http://www.adorama.com/SZ23504.html

For just one of many models available out there.

$33.50, wow, an extra $13.50! Nobody can afford something like that! That's
so much more expensive! <eye roll>

I personally own two of these. The bracket is extremely sturdy, the locking
mechanism to hold the flash at the angle of your choice is very secure and
locks down solid. Build quality was surprisingly much better than I had
ever expected for that price. When the slave unit is switched to
digital-camera mode it adequately ignores all pre-flash events on all
camera settings that have tested it with, with a variety of P&S cameras. I
only have to remember to turn that off when I switch my cameras to manual
flash output modes. (Now, you might ask, why on earth would he buy a slave
that fits into a hot-shoe for his P&S cameras? Because all my P&S cameras
have hot-shoes, but not all my flashes are of the lower trigger voltage
limits of today's digital cameras. I also like firing the flashes held on
extension brackets or mounted on tripods further away from the cameras,
situation dependent. Mostly when photographing more distant wildlife at
night with focused strobes so as not to impart red, blue, orange, or
green-eye in the images. Rare is red-eye ever a problem in wildlife flash
photography.)


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ray Fischer  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 8:11 am
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
From: rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer)
Date: 07 Nov 2009 21:11:32 GMT
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 8:11 am
Subject: Re: Portrait lighting using compact camera's flash
Educationg Trolls Is An Endless Task  <eti...@somewhere.net> wrote:

Go away, asshole troll.

--
Ray Fischer        
rfisc...@sonic.net  


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google