Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Kodak BW400CN - rejected by Bonusprint

View parsed - Show only message text

Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
From: w8...@arrl.net (Bob S)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.35mm
Subject: Re: Kodak BW400CN - rejected by Bonusprint
Date: 10 Sep 2004 19:02:52 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <685c3950.0409101802.3368133b@posting.google.com>
References: <9bec984f.0408230405.2ee0cc53@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.129.201.102
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1094868173 6268 127.0.0.1 (11 Sep 2004 02:02:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 02:02:53 +0000 (UTC)

robertml...@yahoo.com (Robert) wrote in message news:<9bec984f.0408230405.2ee0cc53@posting.google.com>...
> I have been using Kodak BW400CN black and white film in 35mm.   It is
> to be processed using the conventional C-41 colour process.
> 
> Bonusprint will not put it through their C-41 processor.
> 
> Can anyone suggest a film processing company that will handle these
> films and who will scan the negatives dirctly to CD?
> 
> best wishes,
> 
> Robert

Did they give a reason?  Could some "expert" have seen that it was
black and white   but was too dumb to see process C-41 on the film
can?

Bob

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google