Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion OT: Bob Herbert on Michael Jackson
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Fattuchus  
View profile  
 More options Jul 5, 1:23 am
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
From: Fattuchus <fattuc...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 08:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Jul 5 2009 1:23 am
Subject: Re: OT: Bob Herbert on Michael Jackson
On Jul 4, 10:11 am, F Parella <f_pare...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Jul 4, 10:40 am, Fattuchus <fattuc...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > Interesting OP ED in the NY Times:

> > Op-Ed Columnist
> > Behind the Facade
> > By BOB HERBERT
> > Meeting Michael Jackson in the mid-1980s was one of the creepier
> > experiences of my life. I was an editor at The Daily News and had to
> > present him with an award in a large room with just a handful of
> > onlookers and a photographer at Madison Square Garden.

> > I wasn’t put off by the fact that Jackson, then in his mid-20s,
> > couldn’t make small talk. Lots of people have trouble with that. There
> > was something about his overall behavior that weirded me out. He
> > seemed, even then, to be a person who was trying with all of his being
> > to step outside of reality and leave it behind.

> > Emmanuel Lewis, the child star of the hit TV series “Webster,” was
> > with Jackson that evening. The undersized Lewis was probably 13 at the
> > time, but he looked much younger, maybe 7 or 8.

> > Jackson seemed to relate only to Lewis. He made faces at the tiny boy
> > and giggled as Lewis hopped around and climbed over furniture, much to
> > Jackson’s delight. I remember thinking as I left the Garden that
> > Jackson had treated Lewis almost as a pet.

> > I’ve never heard any suggestion of anything improper about the
> > relationship between Jackson and Lewis. But what I wish I had thought
> > more about in those long-ago days of Michael-mania was the era of
> > extreme immaturity and grotesque irresponsibility that was already
> > well under way in America. The craziness played out on a shockingly
> > broad front and Jackson’s life, among many others, would prove to be a
> > shining and ultimately tragic example. . . . . . . . . . .

> > Motown was the label that gave us the Jackson 5. But when Michael and
> > his brothers released their first album in 1969, the label had already
> > reached its creative peak and most of the best work — the stunning
> > originality of the Miracles, the Marvelettes, Mary Wells, Martha and
> > the Vandellas, the Supremes, the Temptations, and others — had been
> > done. Hip-hop would soon appear, and then the violence and misogyny of
> > gangsta rap.

> > All kinds of restraints were coming off. It was almost as if the
> > adults had gone into hiding. The deregulation that we were told would
> > be great for the economy was being applied to the culture as a whole.
> > Women could be treated as sex objects again as misogyny, hardly
> > limited to hip-hop, went mainstream. (Have you looked at network
> > television lately, or listened to the radio?) Astonishing numbers of
> > men abandoned their children with impunity. Most of the nation seemed
> > fine with the idea of going to war without a draft and without raising
> > taxes.

> > In many ways we descended as a society into a fantasyland, trying to
> > leave the limits and consequences and obligations of the real world
> > behind. Politicians stopped talking about the poor. We built up
> > staggering amounts of debt and called it an economic boom. We shipped
> > jobs overseas by the millions without ever thinking seriously about
> > how to replace them. We let New Orleans drown.

> > Jackson was the perfect star for the era, the embodiment of fantasy
> > gone wild. He tried to carve himself up into another person, but, of
> > course, there was the same Michael Jackson underneath — talented but
> > psychologically disabled to the point where he was a danger to himself
> > and others.

> > Reality is unforgiving. There is no escape. Behind the Jackson facade
> > was the horror of child abuse. Court records and reams of well-
> > documented media accounts contain a stream of serious allegations of
> > child sex abuse and other inappropriate behavior with very young boys.
> > Jackson, a multimillionaire megastar, was excused as an eccentric.
> > Small children were delivered into his company, to spend the night in
> > his bed, often by their parents.

> > One case of alleged pedophilia against Jackson, the details of which
> > would make your hair stand on end, was settled for a reported $25
> > million. He beat another case in court.

> > The Michael-mania that has erupted since Jackson’s death — not just an
> > appreciation of his music, but a giddy celebration of his life — is
> > yet another spasm of the culture opting for fantasy over reality. We
> > don’t want to look under the rock that was Jackson’s real life.

> > As with so many other things, we don’t want to know.

> That's the best article on Jackson I've read since his death.  I'm
> incredibly bored with puff pieces, claims about Jacko's supposed
> "musical genius," and with credulous idiots who buy his "Peter Pan"
> facade at face value.  Thanks, Fatt!- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

As a Jackson fan, I am saddened by his death, and frankly, I do enjoy
the puff pieces.  They are comforting at this difficult  time.
However, I must admit that the aboved op/ed piece struck me as
objective, realistic and honest.

MJ was very talented and a wonderful entertainer, but beneath that
surgically altered appearance, there was a very dark side.  I think he
was a tormented, suffering soul.

Herbert's comments about Emmanuel Lewis are both shocking and
honest . . . . Jackson seemed to be very entertained by Lewis,
treating him "almost as a pet."

I don't claim that Jackson engaged in any sexual impropriety, but
there is something very wrong when a grown man does not relate much to
other adults and has such a fascination with children.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google