| |
rec.gambling.poker |
On Jul 6, 12:17 pm, "charrison100" <a11f...@webnntp.invalid> wrote: > > On Jul 6 2009 5:08 AM, charrison100 wrote: > > > Day 1a - 1116 > > > Running total - 3685 > > > Looks like Razz0's line of 5800 is going to be almost perfect. 2115 is a > > From worldseriesofpoker.com updates, posted last night: > > "We have heard unsubstantiated reports that already more than 2,400 > > > Chris > > > "NO! I want this shit to STOP! Right NOW! Nobody takes me serious > > Brew > Wow talk about terrible balancing between days. imagine if day 2b is going > Day 2a is going to be the remaining of day 1a and 1b starting at level 5. > Day 2b is going to be the remaining of day 1c and 1d starting at level 6. > Both day 2's end at level 10 > Even though it looks like they are playing the same amount of poker i So maybe 2b is better ... I don't know what's better ... but it cetainly is different ...
> > > Day 1b - 873
> > > Day 1c - 1696
> > > HUGE field to expect today.
> > players have registered for Day 1d. That number is sure to climb overnight
> > and into the early hours of the morning. The tournament staff may be faced
> > with the unenviable problem of having to cut off registrations due to
> > simple space limitations."
> > > anymore." - Paul
> > > Popinjay, 01/16/2009
> > --
> > Hatred is purity...weakness is disease!
> to be twice the size of 2a.
> 1989 people started those 2 days.
> 4096 people if the 2400 rumor is true.
> think the difference in numbers and when the levels are played could have
> a major effect on the result. What do you think?
a lot deeper stack without skipping a level like 2b ...
I can see a lot greater percentage of the 2a players making it to day
3 compared to the 2b players ... although the total number will be
skewed to day 2b players ... but I guess that means 2b players will
have higher average chip stacks ...