rec.gambling.poker Google Group

You just will not believe this level of stupidity

2009-11-08T04:45:21Z

Well, Obama has hit a level of stupidity that surprises even me. And that
is not an easy thing to to do given that I believe his "spend your way out
of a recession" economic policies are totally idiotic to begin with. But
check this out:
The Obama administration decides to spend millions of dollars from his

Re: Unemployment Benefits Extended

2009-11-08T04:33:42Z

same principle, just different time. Why did it take you 2 months to find a
job? Or was it really like you said "I took two months OFF?" Must have
been great to have the working taxpayers giving you money while you "took
time off". You didn't have the internet back then, so what did you do all

Re: Blackjack Card Counting Ruling in Indiana

2009-11-08T04:28:57Z

news:48c94530-9f57-4c2d-be8e-
Yes, Sensei, they are EXACTLY the same.

Re: Kilimanjaro ice cap disappearing

2009-11-08T04:28:18Z

No he doesn't. But your reading comprehension sucks.
IF they do way more than they need to, they spend too much.
That's irrelevent to the issue of doing NOTHING.
Let's talk about your boy, though
[edit] Academic career
Lomborg spent a year as an undergraduate at the University of Georgia,
earned a master's degree in political science at the University of Aarhus in

Re: Unemployment Benefits Extended

2009-11-08T04:04:31Z

And when was that, numb nuts? About 30 years ago when I took TWO MONTHS
OFF?! These guys, and apparently you too, are taking two YEARS off.
Fucking professional deadbeats. All they do is sit around, collect checks,
and post to the internet all day. It's pathetic.

Re: OT: Unemployment Benefits Extended

2009-11-08T04:18:27Z

Of course, Dave, you are 100% correct on every point you just made.
Obviously you have enough experience and business sense to appreciate the
ramifications of continuing in the way we are continuing. But Dave, there
is a vital conflict in your overall sense of the whole picture. Y'see,
Dave, it is not enough just to have good business sense and a desire to see

Re: The White House: fair and balanced?

2009-11-08T04:20:21Z

Who is crying? And why?

Re: A simple question regarding pot size

2009-11-08T04:15:15Z

Fuckhead, quote the whole message.
We KNOW you're too stupid to read; don't make it obvious.
It IS a 600 chip pot when I raise. It's obviously to protect the pot.
No, in short, you're too stupid to see how big an idiot you are

Re: OT $15,000 policy or jail?

2009-11-08T04:09:10Z

If this is accurate, I would assume that the $15,000 refers to the
amount of coverage, as is usually the case when quoting policies. So
a person making $100,000 would be paying $2,500 for a $15,000 policy,
a person making $30,000 would be paying $750, etc.
***
Not remotely true :
It refers to this :

Re: OT $15,000 policy or jail?

2009-11-08T04:01:11Z

Thanks, that does confirm what I was asking about above, that the
$15,000 figure cited would be for a family of four with a houshold
income that is 400-450% above the Federal Poverty Level, for which the
average in that bracket is $102,000/year. They would also probably
have about $5,000 in out of pocket expenses above the annual premium.

Re: Kilimanjaro ice cap disappearing

2009-11-08T03:48:46Z

On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 22:04:34 -0500, "Beldin the Sorcerer"
Bjørn Lomborg disagrees with you.
Read the whole thing.
Do it quick though, before President Obama "deals" with him and those
of his ilk.
[link]
By Bjorn Lomborg
Monday, September 28, 2009

Re: OT $15,000 policy or jail?

2009-11-08T03:43:17Z

That's true.
However, she failed utterly to see that there are times when your perception
of an individual right is incorrect, and many times when you're acting
against your best interest out of ignorance by insisting on your perceived
right.

Re: A simple question regarding pot size

2009-11-08T03:50:40Z

Beldin Said:
"Raising all in way ahead into a 600 chip pot is a fine play.
When you can count the pot correctly, let me know. "
Follow:
Into a "600 chip pot" does not use the term "protect" anywhere in it. Not
to say that the term "protect" would make your idiotic assertions any more
correct. I just want to show that you did not use the term "protect"

Re: OT: Unemployment Benefits Extended

2009-11-08T03:33:37Z

Yeah, shithead, it's much better to let these people all starve and get
forclosed on... that's SO good for the economy.

Re: OT $15,000 policy or jail?

2009-11-08T03:28:30Z

I like when they say "how much does one person need?" (which of course
always precedes "they should pay like 90% of their income in taxes blah
blah blah")
Brew