"I know what you're thinking. Did he fire six shots or only five? Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement, I've kinda lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya punk?"
Whether or not the price is being cut already the book has done what it was supposed to do, make Sarah Palin rich. This book, which was ghost written, was nothing more than a vehicle to shovel money to Palin by the right wing political machine. It is guaranteed to sell plenty of copies because numerous right wing groups will be making bulk buys of it for their institutions and organizations and the "faithful" will also buy it, although it's a wonder where they will get the money when so many of them are out of work. Needless to say they'll find the money somehow. So you have a book Palin didn't write, an organization that orchestrated the whole thing, a witless following that will buy anything with her name on it even though she wrote none of it, and in the end she gets what she wanted, millions. You have to hand it to the republicans. They really are charitable to their friends. Too bad they aren't that nice to the public.
Another Liberal with no clue about business. Could it be a coincidence?
"Also called clearance sale. the disposal of merchandise at reduced prices to make room for new goods: He bought the coat for half price at a clearance."
Since they have no inventory of this book yet, this is not a clearance. It is a pre-release sale because if they get paid before they even have to order them, they risk nothing. You people are all idiots, and Newsweek knows it. They could tell you absolutely anything and you would swallow it up like the dumb suckers you are. -- So, how's that whole "hopey - changey" thing working out for you so far?
> Whether or not the price is being cut already the book has done what it > was supposed to do, make Sarah Palin rich. This book, which was ghost > written,
> Another Liberal with no clue about business. Could it be a coincidence?
> "Also called clearance sale. the disposal of merchandise at reduced prices >to make room for new goods: He bought the coat for half price at a clearance."
> Since they have no inventory of this book yet, this is not a clearance. It >is a pre-release sale because if they get paid before they even have to order >them, they risk nothing. You people are all idiots, and Newsweek knows it. >They could tell you absolutely anything and you would swallow it up like the >dumb suckers you are.
Yet another clueless Republican't--with no idea about how business really runs. That is no coincidence.
Since they have no inventory of the book, there is no reason to put it on pre-release sale. Anybody with a brain will cancel their "pre-buy" at the old high price and re-buy at the new, low price--which means all sellers lose that nice fat juicy profit. The only time they do that is when there are too many books overhanging the market--which means there are too many of that loser book. And the only way to dump a loser is at a low price (selling to rock-bottom-price customers and dumping the rest to remainder re-sellers).
So, let's see.....
The book isn't even out yet, but it is already massively discounted (below cost?--per IDB) in order to move it (i.e., before any profitable sales have concluded--because there are no books to ship [yet]). So, they sell it below cost--and make it up in volume? Nope. Reaganomics failed--and so did Bushonomics. Palinomics obviously doesn't work either.
The article states resellers pay about 50% of retail for a book. Which means they are selling it below cost--and they are including shipping as well (further increasing losses).
> > Another Liberal with no clue about business. Could it be a coincidence?
> > "Also called clearance sale. the disposal of merchandise at reduced prices > >to make room for new goods: He bought the coat for half price at a clearance."
> > Since they have no inventory of this book yet, this is not a clearance. It > >is a pre-release sale because if they get paid before they even have to order > >them, they risk nothing. You people are all idiots, and Newsweek knows it. > >They could tell you absolutely anything and you would swallow it up like the > >dumb suckers you are.
> Yet another clueless Republican't--with no idea about how > business really runs. That is no coincidence.
> Since they have no inventory of the book, there is no reason > to put it on pre-release sale. Anybody with a brain will > cancel their "pre-buy" at the old high price and re-buy at > the new, low price--which means all sellers lose that nice > fat juicy profit. The only time they do that is when there > are too many books overhanging the market--which means there > are too many of that loser book. And the only way to dump a > loser is at a low price (selling to rock-bottom-price > customers and dumping the rest to remainder re-sellers).
> So, let's see.....
> The book isn't even out yet, but it is already massively > discounted (below cost?--per IDB) in order to move it (i.e., > before any profitable sales have concluded--because there > are no books to ship [yet]). So, they sell it below > cost--and make it up in volume? Nope. Reaganomics > failed--and so did Bushonomics. Palinomics obviously doesn't > work either.
> The article states resellers pay about 50% of retail for a > book. Which means they are selling it below cost--and they > are including shipping as well (further increasing losses).
I saw one of Obama's books at a Dollar tree store the other day for a buck.
>> Another Liberal with no clue about business. Could it be a coincidence?
>> "Also called clearance sale. the disposal of merchandise at reduced prices >>to make room for new goods: He bought the coat for half price at a clearance."
>> Since they have no inventory of this book yet, this is not a clearance. It >>is a pre-release sale because if they get paid before they even have to order >>them, they risk nothing. You people are all idiots, and Newsweek knows it. >>They could tell you absolutely anything and you would swallow it up like the >>dumb suckers you are.
>Yet another clueless Republican't--with no idea about how >business really runs. That is no coincidence.
>Since they have no inventory of the book, there is no reason >to put it on pre-release sale. Anybody with a brain will >cancel their "pre-buy" at the old high price and re-buy at >the new, low price--which means all sellers lose that nice >fat juicy profit. The only time they do that is when there >are too many books overhanging the market--which means there >are too many of that loser book. And the only way to dump a >loser is at a low price (selling to rock-bottom-price >customers and dumping the rest to remainder re-sellers).
>So, let's see.....
>The book isn't even out yet, but it is already massively >discounted (below cost?--per IDB) in order to move it (i.e., >before any profitable sales have concluded--because there >are no books to ship [yet]). So, they sell it below >cost--and make it up in volume? Nope. Reaganomics >failed--and so did Bushonomics. Palinomics obviously doesn't >work either.
>The article states resellers pay about 50% of retail for a >book. Which means they are selling it below cost--and they >are including shipping as well (further increasing losses).
Seems like they pre-ordered inventory & it's a disaster. With Palin what did they expect? -- Cliff
>>> Another Liberal with no clue about business. Could it be a coincidence?
>>> "Also called clearance sale. the disposal of merchandise at reduced prices >>>to make room for new goods: He bought the coat for half price at a clearance."
>>> Since they have no inventory of this book yet, this is not a clearance. It >>>is a pre-release sale because if they get paid before they even have to order >>>them, they risk nothing. You people are all idiots, and Newsweek knows it. >>>They could tell you absolutely anything and you would swallow it up like the >>>dumb suckers you are.
>>Yet another clueless Republican't--with no idea about how >>business really runs. That is no coincidence.
>>Since they have no inventory of the book, there is no reason >>to put it on pre-release sale. Anybody with a brain will >>cancel their "pre-buy" at the old high price and re-buy at >>the new, low price--which means all sellers lose that nice >>fat juicy profit. The only time they do that is when there >>are too many books overhanging the market--which means there >>are too many of that loser book. And the only way to dump a >>loser is at a low price (selling to rock-bottom-price >>customers and dumping the rest to remainder re-sellers).
>>So, let's see.....
>>The book isn't even out yet, but it is already massively >>discounted (below cost?--per IDB) in order to move it (i.e., before any >>profitable sales have concluded--because there are no books to ship [yet]). So, >>they sell it below cost--and make it up in volume? Nope. Reaganomics >>failed--and so did Bushonomics. Palinomics obviously doesn't >>work either.
>>The article states resellers pay about 50% of retail for a >>book. Which means they are selling it below cost--and they are including >>shipping as well (further increasing losses).
> Seems like they pre-ordered inventory & it's a disaster. > With Palin what did they expect?
They expect leftwingers to lie about it and not understand commerce.
And sure enough...
-- So, how's that whole "hopey - changey" thing working out for you so far?
>>>>> LOL >>>>> And it's not even published yet !!!
>>>> Another Liberal with no clue about business. Could it be a coincidence?
>>>> "Also called clearance sale. the disposal of merchandise at reduced >prices >>>>to make room for new goods: He bought the coat for half price at a >clearance."
>>>> Since they have no inventory of this book yet, this is not a clearance. >It >>>>is a pre-release sale because if they get paid before they even have to >order >>>>them, they risk nothing. You people are all idiots, and Newsweek knows it. >>>>They could tell you absolutely anything and you would swallow it up like >the >>>>dumb suckers you are.
>>>Yet another clueless Republican't--with no idea about how >>>business really runs. That is no coincidence.
>>>Since they have no inventory of the book, there is no reason >>>to put it on pre-release sale. Anybody with a brain will >>>cancel their "pre-buy" at the old high price and re-buy at >>>the new, low price--which means all sellers lose that nice >>>fat juicy profit. The only time they do that is when there >>>are too many books overhanging the market--which means there >>>are too many of that loser book. And the only way to dump a >>>loser is at a low price (selling to rock-bottom-price >>>customers and dumping the rest to remainder re-sellers).
>>>So, let's see.....
>>>The book isn't even out yet, but it is already massively >>>discounted (below cost?--per IDB) in order to move it (i.e., before any >>>profitable sales have concluded--because there are no books to ship [yet]). >So, >>>they sell it below cost--and make it up in volume? Nope. Reaganomics >>>failed--and so did Bushonomics. Palinomics obviously doesn't >>>work either.
>>>The article states resellers pay about 50% of retail for a >>>book. Which means they are selling it below cost--and they are including >>>shipping as well (further increasing losses).
>> Seems like they pre-ordered inventory & it's a disaster. >> With Palin what did they expect?
> They expect leftwingers to lie about it and not understand commerce.
> And sure enough...
They make up for their losses per book with volume, right? -- Cliff
>>>>>> LOL >>>>>> And it's not even published yet !!!
>>>>> Another Liberal with no clue about business. Could it be a coincidence?
>>>>> "Also called clearance sale. the disposal of merchandise at reduced >>>>> prices to make room for new goods: He bought the coat for half price at >>>>> a clearance."
>>>>> Since they have no inventory of this book yet, this is not a clearance. >>>>> It is a pre-release sale because if they get paid before they even have >>>>> to order >>>>>them, they risk nothing. You people are all idiots, and Newsweek knows it. >>>>>They could tell you absolutely anything and you would swallow it up like >>>>>the dumb suckers you are.
>>>>Yet another clueless Republican't--with no idea about how >>>>business really runs. That is no coincidence.
>>>>Since they have no inventory of the book, there is no reason >>>>to put it on pre-release sale. Anybody with a brain will >>>>cancel their "pre-buy" at the old high price and re-buy at >>>>the new, low price--which means all sellers lose that nice >>>>fat juicy profit. The only time they do that is when there >>>>are too many books overhanging the market--which means there >>>>are too many of that loser book. And the only way to dump a >>>>loser is at a low price (selling to rock-bottom-price >>>>customers and dumping the rest to remainder re-sellers).
>>>>So, let's see.....
>>>>The book isn't even out yet, but it is already massively >>>>discounted (below cost?--per IDB) in order to move it (i.e., before any >>>>profitable sales have concluded--because there are no books to ship [yet]). >>>>So, they sell it below cost--and make it up in volume? Nope. Reaganomics >>>>failed--and so did Bushonomics. Palinomics obviously doesn't work either.
>>>>The article states resellers pay about 50% of retail for a >>>>book. Which means they are selling it below cost--and they are including >>>>shipping as well (further increasing losses).
>>> Seems like they pre-ordered inventory & it's a disaster. >>> With Palin what did they expect?
>> They expect leftwingers to lie about it and not understand commerce.
>> And sure enough...
> They make up for their losses per book with volume, right?
What are they paying per unit?
-- So, how's that whole "hopey - changey" thing working out for you so far?
>>> "Also called clearance sale. the disposal of merchandise at reduced prices >>> to make room for new goods: He bought the coat for half price at a clearance."
>>> Since they have no inventory of this book yet, this is not a clearance. It >>> is a pre-release sale because if they get paid before they even have to order >>> them, they risk nothing. You people are all idiots, and Newsweek knows it. >>> They could tell you absolutely anything and you would swallow it up like the >>> dumb suckers you are. >> Yet another clueless Republican't--with no idea about how >> business really runs. That is no coincidence.
>> Since they have no inventory of the book, there is no reason >> to put it on pre-release sale. Anybody with a brain will >> cancel their "pre-buy" at the old high price and re-buy at >> the new, low price--which means all sellers lose that nice >> fat juicy profit. The only time they do that is when there >> are too many books overhanging the market--which means there >> are too many of that loser book. And the only way to dump a >> loser is at a low price (selling to rock-bottom-price >> customers and dumping the rest to remainder re-sellers).
>> So, let's see.....
>> The book isn't even out yet, but it is already massively >> discounted (below cost?--per IDB) in order to move it (i.e., >> before any profitable sales have concluded--because there >> are no books to ship [yet]). So, they sell it below >> cost--and make it up in volume? Nope. Reaganomics >> failed--and so did Bushonomics. Palinomics obviously doesn't >> work either.
>> The article states resellers pay about 50% of retail for a >> book. Which means they are selling it below cost--and they >> are including shipping as well (further increasing losses).
> I saw one of Obama's books at a Dollar tree store the other day for a > buck.
You shoulda bought it and then sent it to Bill Ayers to autograph
>>>>>>> LOL >>>>>>> And it's not even published yet !!!
>>>>>> Another Liberal with no clue about business. Could it be a >coincidence?
>>>>>> "Also called clearance sale. the disposal of merchandise at reduced >>>>>> prices to make room for new goods: He bought the coat for half price >at >>>>>> a clearance."
>>>>>> Since they have no inventory of this book yet, this is not a >clearance. >>>>>> It is a pre-release sale because if they get paid before they even >have >>>>>> to order >>>>>>them, they risk nothing. You people are all idiots, and Newsweek knows >it. >>>>>>They could tell you absolutely anything and you would swallow it up like >>>>>>the dumb suckers you are.
>>>>>Yet another clueless Republican't--with no idea about how >>>>>business really runs. That is no coincidence.
>>>>>Since they have no inventory of the book, there is no reason >>>>>to put it on pre-release sale. Anybody with a brain will >>>>>cancel their "pre-buy" at the old high price and re-buy at >>>>>the new, low price--which means all sellers lose that nice >>>>>fat juicy profit. The only time they do that is when there >>>>>are too many books overhanging the market--which means there >>>>>are too many of that loser book. And the only way to dump a >>>>>loser is at a low price (selling to rock-bottom-price >>>>>customers and dumping the rest to remainder re-sellers).
>>>>>So, let's see.....
>>>>>The book isn't even out yet, but it is already massively >>>>>discounted (below cost?--per IDB) in order to move it (i.e., before any >>>>>profitable sales have concluded--because there are no books to ship >[yet]). >>>>>So, they sell it below cost--and make it up in volume? Nope. Reaganomics >>>>>failed--and so did Bushonomics. Palinomics obviously doesn't work either.
>>>>>The article states resellers pay about 50% of retail for a >>>>>book. Which means they are selling it below cost--and they are including >>>>>shipping as well (further increasing losses).
>>>> Seems like they pre-ordered inventory & it's a disaster. >>>> With Palin what did they expect?
>>> They expect leftwingers to lie about it and not understand commerce.
>>> And sure enough...
>> They make up for their losses per book with volume, right?
> What are they paying per unit?
Clearly either too much or about what it's worth (very little). -- Cliff
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:38:50 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_r...@bogus.net> wrote: >In fact she's in rather good company on the list of discounted >authors.
Others are older books long published I suppose .... Can you spell anachronism? Hers is remainderd before publication ... LOL .. -- Cliff
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:38:50 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_r...@bogus.net> wrote: > Wal-Mart, Amazon and Target are making loss leaders out of >bestsellers
Palin is a GREAT loss leader !!! Sort of like the head lemming ...
>>>>>>>> LOL >>>>>>>> And it's not even published yet !!!
>>>>>>> Another Liberal with no clue about business. Could it be a >>>>>>> coincidence?
>>>>>>> "Also called clearance sale. the disposal of merchandise at reduced >>>>>>> prices to make room for new goods: He bought the coat for half price >>>>>>> at a clearance."
>>>>>>> Since they have no inventory of this book yet, this is not a >>>>>>> clearance. It is a pre-release sale because if they get paid before >>>>>>> they even have to order >>>>>>>them, they risk nothing. You people are all idiots, and Newsweek knows >>>>>>>it. They could tell you absolutely anything and you would swallow it up >>>>>>>like the dumb suckers you are.
>>>>>>Yet another clueless Republican't--with no idea about how >>>>>>business really runs. That is no coincidence.
>>>>>>Since they have no inventory of the book, there is no reason >>>>>>to put it on pre-release sale. Anybody with a brain will >>>>>>cancel their "pre-buy" at the old high price and re-buy at >>>>>>the new, low price--which means all sellers lose that nice >>>>>>fat juicy profit. The only time they do that is when there >>>>>>are too many books overhanging the market--which means there >>>>>>are too many of that loser book. And the only way to dump a >>>>>>loser is at a low price (selling to rock-bottom-price >>>>>>customers and dumping the rest to remainder re-sellers).
>>>>>>So, let's see.....
>>>>>>The book isn't even out yet, but it is already massively >>>>>>discounted (below cost?--per IDB) in order to move it (i.e., before any >>>>>>profitable sales have concluded--because there are no books to ship >>>>>>[yet]). So, they sell it below cost--and make it up in volume? Nope. >>>>>>Reaganomics failed--and so did Bushonomics. Palinomics obviously doesn't >>>>>>work either.
>>>>>>The article states resellers pay about 50% of retail for a >>>>>>book. Which means they are selling it below cost--and they are including >>>>>>shipping as well (further increasing losses).
>>>>> Seems like they pre-ordered inventory & it's a disaster. >>>>> With Palin what did they expect?
>>>> They expect leftwingers to lie about it and not understand commerce.
>>>> And sure enough...
>>> They make up for their losses per book with volume, right?
>> What are they paying per unit?
> Clearly either too much or about what it's worth (very little).
In other words, you don't know so all your wild ass guessing about their losses is bullshit.
-- So, how's that whole "hopey - changey" thing working out for you so far?
>>>>>>>>> LOL >>>>>>>>> And it's not even published yet !!!
>>>>>>>> Another Liberal with no clue about business. Could it be a >>>>>>>> coincidence?
>>>>>>>> "Also called clearance sale. the disposal of merchandise at reduced >>>>>>>> prices to make room for new goods: He bought the coat for half >price >>>>>>>> at a clearance."
>>>>>>>> Since they have no inventory of this book yet, this is not a >>>>>>>> clearance. It is a pre-release sale because if they get paid >before >>>>>>>> they even have to order >>>>>>>>them, they risk nothing. You people are all idiots, and Newsweek knows >>>>>>>>it. They could tell you absolutely anything and you would swallow it up >>>>>>>>like the dumb suckers you are.
>>>>>>>Yet another clueless Republican't--with no idea about how >>>>>>>business really runs. That is no coincidence.
>>>>>>>Since they have no inventory of the book, there is no reason >>>>>>>to put it on pre-release sale. Anybody with a brain will >>>>>>>cancel their "pre-buy" at the old high price and re-buy at >>>>>>>the new, low price--which means all sellers lose that nice >>>>>>>fat juicy profit. The only time they do that is when there >>>>>>>are too many books overhanging the market--which means there >>>>>>>are too many of that loser book. And the only way to dump a >>>>>>>loser is at a low price (selling to rock-bottom-price >>>>>>>customers and dumping the rest to remainder re-sellers).
>>>>>>>So, let's see.....
>>>>>>>The book isn't even out yet, but it is already massively >>>>>>>discounted (below cost?--per IDB) in order to move it (i.e., before any >>>>>>>profitable sales have concluded--because there are no books to ship >>>>>>>[yet]). So, they sell it below cost--and make it up in volume? Nope. >>>>>>>Reaganomics failed--and so did Bushonomics. Palinomics obviously doesn't >>>>>>>work either.
>>>>>>>The article states resellers pay about 50% of retail for a >>>>>>>book. Which means they are selling it below cost--and they are including >>>>>>>shipping as well (further increasing losses).
>>>>>> Seems like they pre-ordered inventory & it's a disaster. >>>>>> With Palin what did they expect?
>>>>> They expect leftwingers to lie about it and not understand commerce.
>>>>> And sure enough...
>>>> They make up for their losses per book with volume, right?
>>> What are they paying per unit?
>> Clearly either too much or about what it's worth (very little).
> In other words, you don't know so all your wild ass guessing about their >losses is bullshit.
So how much should she sell for? (Many rethugs go to jail for that but .... ) -- Cliff
>>>>>>>>>> LOL >>>>>>>>>> And it's not even published yet !!!
>>>>>>>>> Another Liberal with no clue about business. Could it be a >>>>>>>>> coincidence?
>>>>>>>>> "Also called clearance sale. the disposal of merchandise at reduced >>>>>>>>> prices to make room for new goods: He bought the coat for half >>>>>>>>> price at a clearance."
>>>>>>>>> Since they have no inventory of this book yet, this is not a >>>>>>>>> clearance. It is a pre-release sale because if they get paid >>>>>>>>> before they even have to order >>>>>>>>>them, they risk nothing. You people are all idiots, and Newsweek knows >>>>>>>>>it. They could tell you absolutely anything and you would swallow it up >>>>>>>>>like the dumb suckers you are.
>>>>>>>>Yet another clueless Republican't--with no idea about how >>>>>>>>business really runs. That is no coincidence.
>>>>>>>>Since they have no inventory of the book, there is no reason >>>>>>>>to put it on pre-release sale. Anybody with a brain will >>>>>>>>cancel their "pre-buy" at the old high price and re-buy at >>>>>>>>the new, low price--which means all sellers lose that nice >>>>>>>>fat juicy profit. The only time they do that is when there >>>>>>>>are too many books overhanging the market--which means there >>>>>>>>are too many of that loser book. And the only way to dump a >>>>>>>>loser is at a low price (selling to rock-bottom-price >>>>>>>>customers and dumping the rest to remainder re-sellers).
>>>>>>>>So, let's see.....
>>>>>>>>The book isn't even out yet, but it is already massively >>>>>>>>discounted (below cost?--per IDB) in order to move it (i.e., before any >>>>>>>>profitable sales have concluded--because there are no books to ship >>>>>>>>[yet]). So, they sell it below cost--and make it up in volume? Nope. >>>>>>>>Reaganomics failed--and so did Bushonomics. Palinomics obviously doesn't >>>>>>>>work either.
>>>>>>>>The article states resellers pay about 50% of retail for a >>>>>>>>book. Which means they are selling it below cost--and they are including >>>>>>>>shipping as well (further increasing losses).
>>>>>>> Seems like they pre-ordered inventory & it's a disaster. >>>>>>> With Palin what did they expect?
>>>>>> They expect leftwingers to lie about it and not understand commerce.
>>>>>> And sure enough...
>>>>> They make up for their losses per book with volume, right?
>>>> What are they paying per unit?
>>> Clearly either too much or about what it's worth (very little).
>> In other words, you don't know so all your wild ass guessing about their >> losses is bullshit.
> So how much should she sell for?
I'm not selling them. I (We) don't know how much they cost wholesale.
> (Many rethugs go to jail for that but .... )
If you're going to add your gibberish after'thought', you should probably finish the sentence for those of us who don't get your hate speech.
-- So, how's that whole "hopey - changey" thing working out for you so far?
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:07:51 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_r...@bogus.net> wrote: >Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote: >>On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:02:43 -0700, Winston_Smith wrote: >>>Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote: >>>>On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:38:50 -0700, Winston_Smith wrote:
>>>>>In fact she's in rather good company on the list of discounted >>>>>authors.
>>>> Others are older books long published I suppose .... >>>> Can you spell anachronism? >>>> Hers is remainderd before publication ... LOL ..
>>>Can you spell hot draw used as a loss leader to get them in the store?
>> Palin: Loss Leader.
>If you are asking me what I think of Palin... She is a moron. She >is an opportunist. If you want to be very kind she can best be >described as trailer trash.
>That said, the fact is she has a following. It's growing. Her book >will be a best seller and the marketers know that her name will draw >people to their stores and they will make money because of her.
I don't know why anyone would pay a penny for a remaindered book whining about the daughter's boyfriend and actually ghost-written by a racist. Conservative family values? Like gummer's?
>The radical left Obamabots can't stand to recognize those simple >facts. If the reaction in this thread is any indication, your heads >are about to explode if she gets one more bit of attention. And of >course she will.
She's funny !!
>Save yourselves the embarrassment of saying no one cares and >predicting that she will disappear into the woodwork because,
I hope not.
>like her >or not, she is not going away and neither are the folks that support >her.
>Heck, she just might out Messiah the big ObamaGod.
|
