Subpanel bonding (3-phase mains) question
The group you are posting to is a
Usenet group . Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.misc, rec.crafts.metalworking
From:
Mike Cook <mc... @NOTyahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 23:02:25 -0800
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 6:02 pm
Subject: Subpanel bonding (3-phase mains) question
Is it never allowed (US National Electrical Code) to bond the ground bus bar to the neutral bus bar? I opened a subpanel and found that both the ground bus bar and cabinet were bonded to the neutral bus bar.
Is this allowed under any circumstance?
This is a "Y" 208/120 configuration utilizing 5 conductors in an industrial building.
Thanks.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.misc, rec.crafts.metalworking
From:
jk <kles... @suddenlink.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:17:38 -0800
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 6:17 pm
Subject: Re: Subpanel bonding (3-phase mains) question
Mike Cook <mc
... @NOTyahoo.com> wrote:
>Is it never allowed (US National Electrical Code) to bond the ground bus bar
>to the neutral bus bar?
>I opened a subpanel and found that both the ground bus bar and cabinet were >bonded to the neutral bus bar.
>Is this allowed under any circumstance?
>This is a "Y" 208/120 configuration utilizing 5 conductors in an industrial >building.
>Thanks.
Yes, ther are a number of situations where this is allowed/required Service Entrance Separately Derived System jk
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.misc, rec.crafts.metalworking
From:
PeterD <pet... @hipson.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:08:38 -0500
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 12:08 am
Subject: Re: Subpanel bonding (3-phase mains) question
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 23:02:25 -0800, Mike Cook <mc... @NOTyahoo.com> wrote:
>Is it never allowed (US National Electrical Code) to bond the ground bus bar
>to the neutral bus bar?
>I opened a subpanel and found that both the ground bus bar and cabinet were >bonded to the neutral bus bar.
>Is this allowed under any circumstance?
>This is a "Y" 208/120 configuration utilizing 5 conductors in an industrial >building.
>Thanks.
When was it installed, and have you read the revelant sections of the NEC?
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.misc, rec.crafts.metalworking
From:
bud-- <remove.budn... @isp.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:46:28 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 1:46 am
Subject: Re: Subpanel bonding (3-phase mains) question
jk wrote:
> Mike Cook <mc
... @NOTyahoo.com> wrote:
>> Is it never allowed (US National Electrical Code) to bond the ground bus bar >> to the neutral bus bar?
>> I opened a subpanel and found that both the ground bus bar and cabinet were >> bonded to the neutral bus bar.
>> Is this allowed under any circumstance?
>> This is a "Y" 208/120 configuration utilizing 5 conductors in an industrial >> building.
>> Thanks.
> Yes, ther are a number of situations where this is allowed/required > Service Entrance > Separately Derived System
Sounds good. An example is a panel fed from a transformer. If it is a panel fed from another panel, the neutral bar must be isolated.
A better newsgroup is probably alt.engineering.electrical.
-- bud--
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.misc, rec.crafts.metalworking
From:
"Steve Lusardi" <stevenos... @lusardi.de>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 14:50:57 +0100
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 12:50 am
Subject: Re: Subpanel bonding (3-phase mains) question
Yes, but only once. The rule is the safety earth is bonded to neutral at source....the distribution transformer. It is never advisable to make this bond too far away from the transformer.because it introduces a reactance issue for high frequency noise. In point of fact, in Europe the equalization bus must not exceed 1 meter in length. If another bond exists, ground loops are introduced, which is another story altogether.Please also note that the same earth reference at the transformer must, at the same point, be earthed through a ground rod or earth plane ground rod array. Steve
"Mike Cook" <mc
... @NOTyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C7190A0102AABB34B08A39AF@news.eternal-september.org ...
> Is it never allowed (US National Electrical Code) to bond the ground bus bar
> to the neutral bus bar?
> I opened a subpanel and found that both the ground bus bar and cabinet were > bonded to the neutral bus bar.
> Is this allowed under any circumstance?
> This is a "Y" 208/120 configuration utilizing 5 conductors in an industrial > building.
> Thanks.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.misc, rec.crafts.metalworking, alt.engineering.electrical
From:
notme <no... @notme.org>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 09:56:36 -0800
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 4:56 am
Subject: Re: Subpanel bonding (3-phase mains) question
Is it never allowed (US National Electrical Code) to bond the ground bus bar to the neutral bus bar? I opened a subpanel and found that both the ground bus bar and cabinet were bonded to the neutral bus bar.
Is this allowed under any circumstance?
This is a "Y" 208/120 configuration utilizing 5 conductors in an industrial building.
Thanks.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.misc, rec.crafts.metalworking, alt.engineering.electrical
From:
"Rich." <rc... @XXcomcast.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 13:42:59 -0500
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 5:42 am
Subject: Re: Subpanel bonding (3-phase mains) question
"notme" <no
... @notme.org> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C71AF4D4031DC440B08A39AF@news.eternal-september.org ...
> Is it never allowed (US National Electrical Code) to bond the ground bus
> bar
> to the neutral bus bar?
> I opened a subpanel and found that both the ground bus bar and cabinet > were > bonded to the neutral bus bar.
> Is this allowed under any circumstance?
> This is a "Y" 208/120 configuration utilizing 5 conductors in an > industrial > building.
> Thanks.
No, according to the NEC it is not allowed in a subpanel at all.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.misc, rec.crafts.metalworking, alt.engineering.electrical
From:
"Ryan Evans" <revans48... @comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:10:55 -0500
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 10:10 am
Subject: Re: Subpanel bonding (3-phase mains) question
"notme" <no
... @notme.org> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C71AF4D4031DC440B08A39AF@news.eternal-september.org ...
> Is it never allowed (US National Electrical Code) to bond the ground bus
> bar
> to the neutral bus bar?
> I opened a subpanel and found that both the ground bus bar and cabinet > were > bonded to the neutral bus bar.
> Is this allowed under any circumstance?
> This is a "Y" 208/120 configuration utilizing 5 conductors in an > industrial > building.
> Thanks.
No. As long as it is a sub-panel. Not to be confused with a seperately-derived system(after a transformer). RE
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.misc, rec.crafts.metalworking, alt.engineering.electrical
From:
Tom Horne <horn... @gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 11:13:41 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 9 2009 6:13 am
Subject: Re: Subpanel bonding (3-phase mains) question
On Nov 7, 12:56 pm, notme <no... @notme.org> wrote:
> Is it never allowed (US National Electrical Code) to bond the ground bus bar
> to the neutral bus bar?
> I opened a subpanel and found that both the ground bus bar and cabinet were > bonded to the neutral bus bar.
> Is this allowed under any circumstance?
> This is a "Y" 208/120 configuration utilizing 5 conductors in an industrial > building.
> Thanks.
With the exception of feeders to separate buildings under previous editions of the US NEC it is not permissible. -- Tom Horne
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.misc, rec.crafts.metalworking, alt.engineering.electrical
From:
Mike Cook <mc... @NOTyahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 22:45:29 -0800
Local: Mon, Nov 9 2009 5:45 pm
Subject: Re: Subpanel bonding (3-phase mains) question
> With the exception of feeders to separate buildings under previous > editions of the US NEC it is not permissible. > -- > Tom Horne
Single building, not large (2000 sq ft?) one service entrance, one main panel, 3 or 4 subpanels. It looks like this bond needs to be broken...
Thanks, Mike (OP)
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.misc, rec.crafts.metalworking, alt.engineering.electrical
From:
Proteus IIV <proteus... @gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:08:06 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 10:08 am
Subject: Re: Subpanel bonding (3-phase mains) question
On Nov 7, 12:56 pm, notme <no... @notme.org> wrote:
> Is it never allowed (US National Electrical Code) to bond the ground bus bar
> to the neutral bus bar?
> I opened a subpanel and found that both the ground bus bar and cabinet were > bonded to the neutral bus bar.
> Is this allowed under any circumstance?
> This is a "Y" 208/120 configuration utilizing 5 conductors in an industrial > building.
> Thanks.
TROLL DROPPINGS TOM LAY OFF YOU NEVER GOT THIS RIGHT TO BEGIN WITH
I AM PROTEUS
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.misc, rec.crafts.metalworking
From:
Paul Keinanen <keina... @sci.fi>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:01:20 +0200
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 11:01 am
Subject: Re: Subpanel bonding (3-phase mains) question
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 23:02:25 -0800, Mike Cook <mc... @NOTyahoo.com> wrote:
>Is it never allowed (US National Electrical Code) to bond the ground bus bar
>to the neutral bus bar?
>I opened a subpanel and found that both the ground bus bar and cabinet were >bonded to the neutral bus bar.
>Is this allowed under any circumstance?
>This is a "Y" 208/120 configuration utilizing 5 conductors in an industrial >building.
At least in the rest of the world (=non-US), this is a typical TN-C-S wiring case, in which the utility company 4 wire TN-C (3L+N) is delivered to building, in which this is separated to a 5 wire TN-S (3L+N+PE) system with separate neutral and ground. This separation is done exactly *once*, typically at the main entrance, after that, neutral and ground should be kept strictly separated.
Paul
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.misc, rec.crafts.metalworking, alt.engineering.electrical
From:
daestrom <daest... @twcny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:08:59 -0500
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 1:08 pm
Subject: Re: Subpanel bonding (3-phase mains) question
notme wrote:
> Is it never allowed (US National Electrical Code) to bond the ground bus bar
> to the neutral bus bar?
> I opened a subpanel and found that both the ground bus bar and cabinet were > bonded to the neutral bus bar.
> Is this allowed under any circumstance?
> This is a "Y" 208/120 configuration utilizing 5 conductors in an industrial > building.
When you say 'sub-panel', it may be confusing. A step-down transformer fed from the service entrance, that in turn feeds 208/120 to a panel is not a sub-panel. In that case the first panel off the transformer is not a usual 'sub-panel' but a fed from a separately derived source (the transformer). You mentioned 208/120 in an 'industrial building', so I think the building service is not 208/120 directly but may be a higher voltage and you have a step-down transformer inside the building.
In that case, the ground/neutral *should* be bonded in the first panel after the transformer.
Now, any other panels fed from the first panel after the step-down transformer are true 'sub-panels' and thus should not have the ground and neutral bonded.
So just to be clear here, are you talking about a true 'sub-panel', or the first panel downstream of a step-down transformer?
daestrom
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.misc, rec.crafts.metalworking
From:
Mike Cook <mc... @NOTyahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:35:47 -0800
Local: Wed, Nov 11 2009 6:35 am
Subject: Re: Subpanel bonding (3-phase mains) question
> At least in the rest of the world (=non-US), this is a typical TN-C-S
> wiring case, in which the utility company 4 wire TN-C (3L+N) is
> delivered to building, in which this is separated to a 5 wire TN-S
> (3L+N+PE) system with separate neutral and ground.
> This separation is done exactly *once*, typically at the main > entrance, after that, neutral and ground should be kept strictly > separated.
> Paul
Correct. The power is delivered as 3-phase plus neutral to the building. From this -- directly, without transformer -- we have 120 "single phase" branch circuits in the panel along with 3-wire (3 phase) circuits.
The panel I am describing (with the N & G bond) is not the main panel, so I presume should not be bonded together.
Thanks, Mike (OP)
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.