Web Images Videos Maps News Groups Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Chain pins
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Werehatrack  
View profile  
 More options May 12 2008, 1:09 pm
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
From: Werehatrack <raul...@earthWEEDSlink.net>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 21:09:58 -0600
Local: Mon, May 12 2008 1:09 pm
Subject: Re: Chain pins
On Sun, 11 May 2008 18:59:33 -0700 (PDT), Owen <xem...@gmail.com> may
have said:

>Bought a new chain and it came with two pins (
>http://members.pcug.org.au/~rcook/images/Chain_pins.jpg )

>I can't get pin B back in (though I haven't tried a bit more force)

>Pin A seems to be a Pin B with an insertion guide which can be broken
>off after insertion. This seems to be a 'use once' system and wonder
>if I am right on that score?

>Seems to be an unsatisfactory means of joining chains and ask if this
>some kind of cheapy connection method

Pin B is a used pin that was pushed out with a chainbreaker; both ends
appear peened.  It should have been discarded before the chain was
sold to you.  Pin B is a Shimano use-once pin, and yes, you insert it
and break it off.  Trying to re-use B will likely damage the chain;
don't do it.  

Although there are premature wear issues with some of them, I prefer
to use snaplinks instead of Shimano's pins precisely because they
usually can be reused.  Since my preferred method of cleaning a chain
is to remove it and solvent-wash it in a 2 liter plastic bottle,
having to buy a new pin each time seems like an unnecessary waste.
The snaplink manufacturers all say that their links work only with
specific models of their own chains, but I have enjoyed wide lack of
symptoms of any compatibility issues as long as I have kept to the
appropriate width of link for the chain.  Apparently, there's a great
deal more standardization than is admitted.

--
My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google