<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>rec.bicycles.tech Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech</link>
  <description>Cycling product design, construction, maintenance, etc.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: WIND</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/582b670bc483998e/c638e95acabf1bf5?show_docid=c638e95acabf1bf5</link>
  <description>
  Yes, thanks for your help and that of Gennaro. I got similar numbers &lt;br&gt; when I tried to work this out for myself. &lt;br&gt; This explains what Jobst is talking about and what I was missing (even &lt;br&gt; if there&#39;s more to wind than that as people have been discussing in &lt;br&gt; other posts).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/582b670bc483998e/c638e95acabf1bf5?show_docid=c638e95acabf1bf5</guid>
  <author>
  spams...@spam.eggs
  (Ben C)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:42:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: WIND</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/582b670bc483998e/974b0069dc1c1265?show_docid=974b0069dc1c1265</link>
  <description>
  OK, so using this example, my relative wind of [-30, 20] has a magnitude &lt;br&gt; of 36kph. So a force of something proportional to 1296 (36*36=1296). &lt;br&gt; So as a force vector, I could write it [-1078.35, 718.90] (multiplied by &lt;br&gt; some coefficient to get actual N). &lt;br&gt; But without the side-wind, my force vector would be [-900, 0] (just
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/582b670bc483998e/974b0069dc1c1265?show_docid=974b0069dc1c1265</guid>
  <author>
  spams...@spam.eggs
  (Ben C)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:40:19 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: wheel building: uneven tension between inbound and outbound spokes</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/eda5b3aa4b73c378/33318e627865cb79?show_docid=33318e627865cb79</link>
  <description>
  Spoke tension on symmetrical (front) wheels should be identical within &lt;br&gt; acoustic sensing (plucking spokes with the fingernail). You don&#39;t &lt;br&gt; need a tensiometer for that although it is useful for recording how &lt;br&gt; tight the wheel was built for a bicycle shop. Once done a few times, &lt;br&gt; tone is a clear indication of tension, assuming the same thickness
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/eda5b3aa4b73c378/33318e627865cb79?show_docid=33318e627865cb79</guid>
  <author>
  jbra...@sonic.net
  (Jobst Brandt)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:28:11 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: A GUIDE TO GLOBAL WARMING FOR THOSE EDUCATED IN THE UNIVERSITY OF LIFE</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/ca252e9934e3d81d/faf9af0b216fbc05?show_docid=faf9af0b216fbc05</link>
  <description>
  With Quotefix installed, you can still turn the &#39;&amp;gt;&#39; indenting off and on as you &lt;br&gt; describe. But without it, you can&#39;t turn it on when OE is broken. You can &lt;br&gt; change the settings all you want, but OE refuses to indent and add the &amp;gt; no &lt;br&gt; matter what you do. To me, everything else Quotefix offers is fluff ;-).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/ca252e9934e3d81d/faf9af0b216fbc05?show_docid=faf9af0b216fbc05</guid>
  <author>
  (Fred)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:07:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: How you can save fuel and the environment</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/2228abdd4caf7a22/3ab11e002fe8d253?show_docid=3ab11e002fe8d253</link>
  <description>
  Please. In a 2000 to 6000 pound car? Not likely. &lt;br&gt; In fact, according to your formula, a 6000 pound car would use about &lt;br&gt; 575 times as much fuel as a 2000 pound car. That&#39;s 110% fuel &lt;br&gt; consumption to the 66.667 power (The exponent comes from 4000 pounds &lt;br&gt; difference divided by 60 pounds per 10% increase).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/2228abdd4caf7a22/3ab11e002fe8d253?show_docid=3ab11e002fe8d253</guid>
  <author>
  chalo.col...@gmail.com
  (Chalo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:06:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: WIND</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/582b670bc483998e/6fac271fbf4f1b76?show_docid=6fac271fbf4f1b76</link>
  <description>
  On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:41:02 -0800 (PST), Ron &amp;lt;ron.r.geo...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Dear Ron, &lt;br&gt; Figure 4.6 is the photo of the chest-level Campbell wrap-around &lt;br&gt; fairing. &lt;br&gt; Figure 4.7 is the drawing of the Windfoiler see-through face-high &lt;br&gt; front-only fairing &lt;br&gt; Figure 4.8 is the vertical series of diagrams and partial drag
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/582b670bc483998e/6fac271fbf4f1b76?show_docid=6fac271fbf4f1b76</guid>
  <author>
  carlfo...@comcast.net
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:56:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: A GUIDE TO GLOBAL WARMING FOR THOSE EDUCATED IN THE UNIVERSITY OF LIFE</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/ca252e9934e3d81d/156b0bd26d80d50d?show_docid=156b0bd26d80d50d</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m delighted to discover how AWESOME you are, Dan! Get back to me &lt;br&gt; when you get over yourself! Or should I have said, if. . . &lt;br&gt; Fred
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/ca252e9934e3d81d/156b0bd26d80d50d?show_docid=156b0bd26d80d50d</guid>
  <author>
  (Fred)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:40:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: WIND</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/582b670bc483998e/e3c4f46755b8c562?show_docid=e3c4f46755b8c562</link>
  <description>
  The vector certainly does capture one reason why side winds are worse &lt;br&gt; than still air. What you&#39;re missing here is that the force from wind &lt;br&gt; is nonlinear in terms of the wind velocity. Wind resistance scales &lt;br&gt; with the square of relative air velocity for the ranges of speeds &lt;br&gt; we&#39;re talking about. So take your example. Going 30 kmh in still air,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/582b670bc483998e/e3c4f46755b8c562?show_docid=e3c4f46755b8c562</guid>
  <author>
  zzyzx.xy...@gmail.com
  (pm)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:37:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: wheel building: uneven tension between inbound and outbound spokes</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/eda5b3aa4b73c378/dbedf0995360c0ed?show_docid=dbedf0995360c0ed</link>
  <description>
  Of course one set of spokes will have more tension than the other. &lt;br&gt; They come from slightly different angles due to the crossing.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/eda5b3aa4b73c378/dbedf0995360c0ed?show_docid=dbedf0995360c0ed</guid>
  <author>
  j...@cox.net
  (JG)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:08:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: News in the world of Global Warming</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/dbf8fe1f93c5fc9b/f41ba7b053b162e2?show_docid=f41ba7b053b162e2</link>
  <description>
  There is no evidence to support this claim. &lt;br&gt; And here we go again, the cocksuckers love to play the victim in lieu &lt;br&gt; of having evidence for their hysterical emotionalism. &lt;br&gt; moo.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/dbf8fe1f93c5fc9b/f41ba7b053b162e2?show_docid=f41ba7b053b162e2</guid>
  <author>
  landot...@gmail.com
  (landotter)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:59:49 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: News in the world of Global Warming</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/dbf8fe1f93c5fc9b/ebe87d369f8aedce?show_docid=ebe87d369f8aedce</link>
  <description>
  &amp;quot;... ideologically driven... &amp;quot;?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/dbf8fe1f93c5fc9b/ebe87d369f8aedce?show_docid=ebe87d369f8aedce</guid>
  <author>
  danover...@gmail.com
  (Dan O)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:50:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: A GUIDE TO GLOBAL WARMING FOR THOSE EDUCATED IN THE UNIVERSITY OF LIFE</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/ca252e9934e3d81d/d741fae9a5988345?show_docid=d741fae9a5988345</link>
  <description>
  The mere fact that you would use Outlook Express at all says enough.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/ca252e9934e3d81d/d741fae9a5988345?show_docid=d741fae9a5988345</guid>
  <author>
  danover...@gmail.com
  (Dan O)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:49:58 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: I&#39;m On Twitter! Follow Velo Pollinations...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/6d15d29e52d93a34/f0b5ab40e50c1aff?show_docid=f0b5ab40e50c1aff</link>
  <description>
  POTD &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://dvdmedia.ign.com/dvd/image/article/935/935841/the-day-the-earth-stood-still-special-edition-20081204031732410-000.jpg&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/6d15d29e52d93a34/f0b5ab40e50c1aff?show_docid=f0b5ab40e50c1aff</guid>
  <author>
  datak...@yahoo.com
  (datakoll)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:43:45 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: I&#39;m On Twitter! Follow Velo Pollinations...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/6d15d29e52d93a34/0c5784453c5e08e5?show_docid=0c5784453c5e08e5</link>
  <description>
  POTD!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/6d15d29e52d93a34/0c5784453c5e08e5?show_docid=0c5784453c5e08e5</guid>
  <author>
  so...@noyb.com
  (Bill Sornson)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:43:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: WIND</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/582b670bc483998e/ace8cb53019cd989?show_docid=ace8cb53019cd989</link>
  <description>
  Carl, &lt;br&gt; Where is figure 4.8 in the picture? Interesting, thanks for sharing. &lt;br&gt; -Ron &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://cozybeehive.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/582b670bc483998e/ace8cb53019cd989?show_docid=ace8cb53019cd989</guid>
  <author>
  ron.r.geo...@gmail.com
  (Ron)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:41:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
