rec.backcountry Google Group

Re: Election by appearance

s...@i.an (Pro.Si.Mi) — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:00:40 UT

I'm relativley tolerant of your idiocy, thus far..
Oh, didn't dot.com till later in life?
Even worse then, as you'd be expected to have developed some decorum and
manner by now.
Oh nuts, hence our miasma of mixed results...
Actually I think you refer to KBR, as HAL is in oil and gas production,
but no matter.

[l/m 8/16/96] AMS Distilled Wisdom (21/28) XYZ

eug...@empress.cse.ucsc.edu (Eugene Miya) — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:20:02 UT

TABLE OF CONTENTS of this chain:
21/ AMS <* THIS PANEL *>
22/ Babies and Kids
23/ A bit of song (like camp songs)
24/ What is natural?
25/ A romantic notion of high-tech employment
26/ Other news groups of related interest, networking
27/ Films/cinema references
28/ References (written)
1/ DISCLAIMER

Re: White gas stove in wind/cold

lever...@linkpendium.com (Wolf Leverich) — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:48:11 UT

In point of fact, water contamination seems to go hand-in-hand
*rust* contamination, and rust flakes actually cause more problems
than a little water in a stove.
The Coleman funnels seem to be pretty good at keeping the rust
out of the fuel going into the stove ...
Cheers, Wolf.

Re: White gas stove in wind/cold

jd_mem...@newsguy.com (JD) — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:35:38 UT

In article <4b05ed5d$1@darkstar>, Eugene Miya says...
Yes that is true, it may not be water contaminated fuel. I was however
responding to Mike Romain's statement about the nature of the felt material in
the "Coleman funnels".
I believe that the initial OP's problem may stem from priming procedure or

Re: Election by appearance

lever...@linkpendium.com (Wolf Leverich) — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:22:30 UT

Er. I think you confuse an intolerance of idiocy with a
haughty and condescending manner. ;)
Interesting sentiment, but I wasn't wealthy early in life. Having
had more illusions and less common sense than Bush, Cheney, Limbaugh,
and the rest of the chickenhawks, I wasted a considerable number of
years working on America's defense.

Re: Election by appearance

s...@i.an (Pro.Si.Mi) — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:25:49 UT

lol.

Re: Election by appearance

s...@i.an (Pro.Si.Mi) — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:25:05 UT

You lied again.
Hate, Pro.

Re: Election by appearance

s...@i.an (Pro.Si.Mi) — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:24:45 UT

Your haughty and condescending manner belies a wounded inner child.
How sad that wealth which comes early in life is oft times wasted on
those least equipped to cope with it.
Hate, Pro.

Re: Election by appearance

davebu...@yahoo.com (Dave Bugg) — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:43:26 UT

My GAWD, Mr. Wolf, I admire your forthrightness in describing your flaws. I
do believe your condition falls within the parameters of the Americans with
Disabilities Act and will qualify you for a Handicapped Parking sticker.
Check with your social worker for confirmation.

Re: Election by appearance

lever...@linkpendium.com (Wolf Leverich) — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:27:56 UT

I always tell the truth.
As a practical matter, it's much easier than lying and
telling the truth makes it virtually impossible to get
tangled up in inconsistencies.
I'm kinda amazed at reality-challenged people. By and
large, believing in the Tooth Fairy is not a promising
path to success in life.

Re: Election by appearance

lever...@linkpendium.com (Wolf Leverich) — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:21:25 UT

Life is hard; it's harder if you're stupid.
And it is "perceived".
Love, Wolf.

Re: Election by appearance

s...@i.an (Pro.Si.Mi) — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:59:59 UT

You'd be amazed what an egomaniac he is.
Get him to tell you all bout his mansion and net worth.
He will, trust me...
[link]

Re: Election by appearance

s...@i.an (Pro.Si.Mi) — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:56:33 UT

YOU ARE A LIAR.
Hate, Pro.

Re: Election by appearance

s...@i.an (Pro.Si.Mi) — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:55:19 UT

Put a bullet through your useless head, then we can all have a party,
dipshit.
Hate, Pro.

Re: Election by appearance

davebu...@yahoo.com (Dave Bugg) — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:28:38 UT

Translation: "Oops, shown up again to be the massive twit that I am."
Blah, blah, blah. Nice try at misdirection, but it doesn't work. What was
show was that in Washington State, the amount of fraud that was caught, was
indicative of the broader base of fraudulent ballots that got through. That
was the reason why the number of ballots cast and COUNTED did not match, by