Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Election by appearance
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 226 - 250 of 258 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals) < Older  Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Moderate  
View profile  
 More options Oct 29, 9:01 pm
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: "Moderate" <sparky@_engineer_.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:01:50 -0500
Local: Thurs, Oct 29 2009 9:01 pm
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

"Wolf Leverich" <lever...@linkpendium.com> wrote in message

news:slrnhehcrs.s03.leverich@askin-17.linkpendium.com...

Fabrications and childish name calling is not a substitute for debate.  If
you were a Republican you might understand.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Wolf Leverich  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30, 1:04 am
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: "Wolf Leverich" <lever...@linkpendium.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:04:32 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Fri, Oct 30 2009 1:04 am
Subject: Re: Election by appearance
On 2009-10-29, Moderate <sparky@_engineer_.com> wrote:

No, if I were a member of the *stupid* wing of the Party,
then being reality-challenged might work for me.

Apart from scattered onesies, I am still unaware of any ...

read more »


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dan  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30, 1:46 pm
Newsgroups: mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:46:29 -0800
Local: Fri, Oct 30 2009 1:46 pm
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

Of course, purging voter rolls of legitimate voters, as was documented
in Florida prior to the 2000 election, is fraud.  Otherwise a good
description, even though you apparently are on the other side of the
fence...

Dan


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dan  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30, 1:53 pm
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:53:49 -0800
Local: Fri, Oct 30 2009 1:53 pm
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

Fiftycal wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:05:36 +0000 (UTC), "Dr. Brian Leverich"
> <lever...@askin-17.linkpendium.com> wrote:

>> This is why letting the Caribou Barbie
>> crowd out of their padded rooms was a Really Bad Idea, and why we
>> should invite the guys with butterfly nets to come and collect
>> them all at the next tea party they attend.

> Yep.  Sarah Palin scares the living shit out of the
> socialist/obammy-is-lord crowd,

Who would they be?  The only people I have ever seen who think
Obama-is-lord are Republicans!  And I know [of] very few people who are
real socialists, unlike Republicans, who think the words "liberal" and
"socialist" both mean "not Republican enough" (thank you St. Ronald of
Reagan).

Any empty-headed but charismatic person chosen for those very traits
scares me if that person is touted to be a heartbeat away from, or to
actually be, the President...

> like this sockpuppet.  And the
> INDIVIDUALS that stand up to be counted at the Tea Partys reinforces
> that fear.  

There are very few "individuals" at the astroturfed "Tea Parties."  A
lot of "Me Too"s and rubes who have no clue waht any of the issues are,
though.

> And they are having to scurry around and create a
> replacement for their shunned ACORN astroturfers.  

Don't have a clue what the word means, do you?

> Wait til next week
> and the NJ and VA fascist dimorat govs are unelected.  

Well, since there are no fascist dimorats in office, I have no clue what
you mean (though I do know what you think you mean and are too stupid to
know how to say).

Sigh.  Kids today.

Dan


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dan  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30, 1:55 pm
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:55:49 -0800
Local: Fri, Oct 30 2009 1:55 pm
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

Good start.

> It is not absurd to apply "socialist" as a perjorative
> to Democrats,

Oops, big pratfall...

> since socialism and particularly communism
> is what you find out at the left end of the political
> spectrum.

Which is where the Democrats are definitely NOT...

Sigh.

Dan


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dan  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30, 1:56 pm
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:56:52 -0800
Local: Fri, Oct 30 2009 1:56 pm
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

Then you will provide some cites?

Snicker.

Dan


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Fiftycal  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30, 1:58 pm
Newsgroups: mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: Fiftycal <n...@abcnnbcbs.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:58:19 -0500
Local: Fri, Oct 30 2009 1:58 pm
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:46:29 -0800, Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Love, Wolf.

>Of course, purging voter rolls of legitimate voters, as was documented
>in Florida prior to the 2000 election, is fraud.  Otherwise a good
>description, even though you apparently are on the other side of the
>fence...

Oh, look.  It's "good" socialist and "bad" socialist.  You bois been
watching to much TV.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Fiftycal  
View profile  
 More options Oct 30, 2:01 pm
Newsgroups: mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: Fiftycal <n...@abcnnbcbs.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:01:04 -0500
Local: Fri, Oct 30 2009 2:01 pm
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:53:49 -0800, Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Yep.  Sarah Palin scares the living shit out of the
>> socialist/obammy-is-lord crowd,

>Who would they be?

Find a mirror.

>> And they are having to scurry around and create a
>> replacement for their shunned ACORN astroturfers.  

>Don't have a clue what the word means, do you?

Yah.  How much did you make for your last "demonstration"?  Did ACORN
give you a sack lunch or just $5?

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
HeyBub  
View profile  
 More options Oct 31, 1:39 am
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: "HeyBub" <hey...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:39:33 -0500
Local: Sat, Oct 31 2009 1:39 am
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

Dan wrote:

>> Get your head out of the sand and move away from de Nile.  Acorn's
>> voter fraud is well documented and disgraceful.

> Then you will provide some cites?

> Snicker.

> Dan

Well, just this month

Nevada
http://www.courthousenews.com/2009/10/27/ACORN_Pleads_Not_Guilty_in_N...
Pennsylvania
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20091030_Night_of_the_living_d...
Wisconsin
http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2009/oct/12/news/chi-ap-wi-acorn-r...
Minnesota
http://www.startribune.com/blogs/63698702.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEy...

And dozens of others...


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Wolf Leverich  
View profile  
 More options Oct 31, 7:41 am
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: "Wolf Leverich" <lever...@linkpendium.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:41:01 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sat, Oct 31 2009 7:41 am
Subject: Re: Election by appearance
On 2009-10-30, HeyBub <hey...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:

This is getting really old.

The courthousenews is the stupid paying-canvassers-per-
registration thing.

The Inquirer piece is fluff.

The Chi Trib piece is another paid canvasser doing fake
regs.

The Star Trib is fluff.  WooWoo, NEWSFLASH!, Republicans
claim Dems cheated when they win.  That's almost as shocking
as Dems claiming Republicans cheated when Republicans win.

LOOK, IS EVERY OTHER FUCKING REPUBLICAN AN IDIOT?

My contention is that besides onesies, there isn't any
evidence that ACORN is causing the CASTING OF FRAUDULENT
BALLOTS.

You idiots keep talking about the fraudulent regs, which
are well-known and of course have happened by the bucketful.

But fake regs don't affect elections.  I could register the
entire population of China in my small community and, apart
from working our poor voter registrar to death, it doesn't
matter at all.

So where's the evidence of massive organized ACORN *ballot*
fraud?

It doesn't exist.

Love, Wolf.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Wolf Leverich  
View profile  
 More options Oct 31, 7:49 am
Newsgroups: mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: "Wolf Leverich" <lever...@linkpendium.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:49:17 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sat, Oct 31 2009 7:49 am
Subject: Re: Election by appearance
On 2009-10-30, Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Of course, purging voter rolls of legitimate voters, as was documented
> in Florida prior to the 2000 election, is fraud.  Otherwise a good
> description, even though you apparently are on the other side of the
> fence...

> Dan

No, it's not fraud.  It's a competent, workmanlike job
of doing the ground game.

If you can prevent Democrats from voting and you don't
go to jail for it, then you're doing your job.

"Fraud" might have been the Ohio 2004 post-game festivities,
but, since I don't know how we did it, I'm inclined to
just assume that it was one of those rare omega points way
out past the usual confidence intervals.

Love, Wolf.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dan  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3, 6:56 am
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:56:26 -0800
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 6:56 am
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

And nary a single instance of voter fraud!  Nor a single case where any
of the events deemed less-than-ideal were institutional...

Start paddling.  De Nile is a LONG river.

Dan


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dan  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3, 7:00 am
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:00:11 -0800
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 7:00 am
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

And NO ONE has accused ACORN of the favorite REPUBLICAN tactic [illegal]
of tossing registrations of the opposite party (which was not actually
institutionalized, either, just perpetrated by overzealous
college-educated young Republicans).

And NO ONE has accused ACORN of purging the voter rolls of valid voters,
as documented in Florida (and certainly happened elsewhere, perhaps even
by both parties on smaller scales).

Sheesh, what a bunch of losers to keep bringing up this stuff.

Dan


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Fiftycal  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3, 3:09 pm
Newsgroups: mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: Fiftycal <n...@abcnnbcbs.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:09:07 -0600
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 3:09 pm
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

Well, praise allah that Congress has cut off their funding for the
immediate future.  Oh danny boy, why don't you give them some of your
excess money?  I'm sure they will put it to better use than you will.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Wolf Leverich  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 2:14 am
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: "Wolf Leverich" <lever...@linkpendium.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:14:54 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 2:14 am
Subject: Re: Election by appearance
On 2009-11-02, Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Yeah, we used to do this when I was a YR.  In retrospect it seems
naive and pointless, because you just can't screw with more than
a relative handful of voters this way.

With modern technology, you can dump tens of thousands just as
easily.

Cheers, Wolf.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Pro.Si.Mi  
View profile  
 More options Nov 19, 8:57 am
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: "Pro.Si.Mi" <s...@i.an>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:57:05 -0700
Local: Thurs, Nov 19 2009 8:57 am
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

Wolf Leverich wrote:
> So where's the evidence of massive organized ACORN *ballot*
> fraud?

http://rottenacorn.com/activityMap.html

> It doesn't exist.

AR      1998    A contractor with ACORN-affiliated Project Vote was arrested for
falsifying about 400 voter registration cards.
CO      2005    Two ex-ACORN employees were convicted in Denver of perjury for
submitting false voter registrations.
        2004    An ACORN employee admitted to forging signatures and registering
three of her friends to vote 40 times.
CT      2008    The New York Post reported that ACORN submitted a voter
registration card for a 7-year-old Bridgeport girl. Another 8,000 cards
from the same city will be scrutinized for possible fraud.
FL      2009    In September, 11 ACORN workers were accused of forging voter
registration applications in Miami-Dade County during the last election.
The Florida Department of Law Enforcement and the state attorney’s
office scoured hundreds of suspicious applications provided by ACORN and
found 197 of 260 contained personal ID information that did not match
any living person.
        2008    Election officials in Brevard County have given prosecutors more
than 23 suspect registrations from ACORN. The state's Division of
Elections is also investigating complaints in Orange and Broward Counties.
        2004    A Florida Department of Law Enforcement spokesman said ACORN was
“singled out” among suspected voter registration groups for a 2004 wage
initiative because it was “the common thread” in the agency’s fraud
investigations.
IN      2008    Election officials in Indiana have thrown out more than 4,000
ACORN-submitted voter registrations after finding they had identical
handwriting and included the names of many deceased Indianans, and even
the name of a fast food restaurant.
MI      2008    Clerks in Detroit found a "sizeable number of duplicate and
fraudulent [voter] applications" from the Michigan branch of ACORN.
Those applications have been turned over to the U.S. Attorney's office
for investigation.
2004    The Detroit Free Press reported that “overzealous or unscrupulous
campaign workers in several Michigan counties are under investigation
for voter-registration fraud, suspected of attempting to register
nonexistent people or forging applications for already-registered
voters.” ACORN-affiliate Project Vote was one of two groups suspected of
turning in the documents.
MO      2008    Nearly 400 ACORN-submitted registrations in Kansas City have
been rejected due to duplication or fake information.
2007    Four ACORN employees were indicted in Kansas City for charges
including identity theft and filing false registrations during the 2006
election.
2006    Eight ACORN employees in St. Louis were indicted on federal
election fraud charges. Each of the eight faces up to five years in
prison for forging signatures and submitting false information.
2003    Of 5,379 voter registration cards ACORN submitted in St. Louis,
only 2,013 of those appeared to be valid. At least 1,000 are believed to
be attempts to register voters illegally.
MN      2004    During a traffic stop, police found more than 300 voter
registration cards in the trunk of a former ACORN employee, who had
violated a legal requirements that registration cards be submitted to
the Secretary of State within 10 days of being filled out and signed.
NC      2008    County elections officials have sent suspicious voter
registration applications to the state Board of Elections. Many of the
applications had similar or identical names, but with different
addresses or dates of birth.
2004    North Carolina officials investigated ACORN for submitting fake
voter registration cards.
NM      2008    Prosecutors are investigating more than 1,100 ACORN-submitted
voter registration cards after a county clerk found them to be
fraudulent. Many of the cards included duplicate names and slightly
altered personal information.
2005    Four ACORN employees submitted as many as 3,000 potentially
fraudulent signatures on the group’s Albuquerque ballot initiative. A
local sheriff added: “It’s safe to say the forgery was widespread.”
        2004    An ACORN employee registered a 13-year-old boy to vote. Citing
this and other examples, New Mexico State Representative Joe Thompson
stated that ACORN was “manufacturing voters” throughout New Mexico.
NV      2009    Nevada authorities indicted ACORN on 26 counts of voter
registration fraud and 13 counts of illegally compensating canvassers.
ACORN provided a bonus compensation program called “Blackjack” or “21+”
for any canvasser who registered more than 20 voters per shift, which is
illegal under Nevada law.
        2008    Nevada state authorities raided ACORN's Las Vegas headquarters
as part of a task force investigation of election fraud. Fraudulent
registrations included players from the Dallas Cowboys.
OH      2008    ACORN activists gave Ohio residents cash and cigarettes in
exchange for filling out voter registration card, according to the New
York Post. Some voters claim to have registered dozens of times, and one
man says he signed up on 72 cards.
2007    A man in Reynoldsburg was indicted on two felony counts of illegal
voting and false registration, after being registered by ACORN to vote
in two separate counties.
2004    A grand jury indicted a Columbus ACORN worker for submitting a
false signature and false voter registration form. In Franklin County,
two ACORN workers submitted what the director of the board of election
supervisors called “blatantly false” forms. In Cuyahoga County, ACORN
and its affiliate Project Vote submitted registration cards that had the
highest rate of errors for any voter registration group.
PA      2009    Seven ACORN workers in the Pittsburgh area were indicted for
submitting falsified voter registration forms. Six of the seven were
also indicted for registering voters under an illegal quota system.
2008    State election officials have thrown out 57,435 voter
registrations, the majority of which were submitted by ACORN. The
registrations were thrown out after officials found "clearly fraudulent"
signatures, vacant lots listed as addresses, and other signs of fraud.
2008    An ACORN employee in West Reading, PA, was sentenced to up to 23
months in prison for identity theft and tampering with records. A second
ACORN worker pleaded not guilty to the same charges and is free on
$10,000 bail.
2004    Reading’s Director of Elections received calls from numerous
individuals complaining that ACORN employees deliberately put inaccurate
information on their voter registration forms. The Berks County director
of elections said voter fraud was “absolutely out of hand,” and added:
“Not only do we have unintentional duplication of voter registration but
we have blatant duplicate voter registrations.” The Berks County deputy
director of elections added that ACORN was under investigation by the
Department of Justice.
TX      2008    In Harris County, nearly 10,000 ACORN-submitted registrations
were found to be invalid, including many with clearly fraudulent
addresses or other personal information.
2008    ACORN turned in the voter registration form of David Young, who
told reporters “The signature is not my signature. It’s not even close.”
His social security number and date of birth were also incorrect.
VA      2005    In 2005, the Virginia State Board of Elections admonished
Project Vote and ACORN for turning in a significant number of faulty
voter registrations. An audit revealed that 83% of sampled registrations
that were rejected for carrying false or questionable information were
submitted by Project Vote. Many of these registrations carried social
security numbers that exist for other people, listed non-existent or
commercial addresses, or were for convicted felons in violation of state
and federal election law.

In a letter to ACORN, the State Board of Elections reported that 56% of
the voter registration applications ACORN turned in were ineligible.
Further, a full 35% were not submitted in a timely manner, as required
by law. The State Board of Elections also commented on what appeared to
be evidence of intentional voter fraud. "Additionally,” they wrote,
“information appears to have been altered on some applications where
information given by the applicant in one color ink has been scratched
through and re-entered in another color ink. Any alteration of a voter
registration application is a Class 5 Felony in accordance with §
24.2-1009 of the Code of Virginia."
WA      2007    Three ACORN employees pleaded guilty, and four more were
charged, in the worst case of voter registration fraud in Washington
state history. More than 2,000 fraudulent voter registration cards were
submitted by the group during a voter registration drive.
WI      2008    At least 33,000 ACORN-submitted registrations in Milwaukee have
been called into question after it was found that the organizations had
been using felons as registration workers, in violation of state
election rules. Two people involved in the ongoing Wisconsin voter fraud
investigation have been charged with felonies.
2004    The district attorney’s office investigated seven voter
registration applications Project Vote employees filed in the names of
people who said the group never contacted them. Former Project Vote
employee Robert Marquise Blakely told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
that he had not met with any of the people whose voter registration
applications he signed, “an apparent violation of state law,” according
to the paper.

> Love, Wolf.

Derision, Pro.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Wolf Leverich  
View profile  
 More options Nov 20, 3:01 pm
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: "Wolf Leverich" <lever...@linkpendium.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:01:38 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Fri, Nov 20 2009 3:01 pm
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

YOU ARE A MORON.

You are precisely what's wrong with the contemporary Republican
Party.  Obviously your central nervous system terminates at the
medulla oblongata.

If you read your own list, virtually all of these are examples
of *registration* fraud.  Most are the result of paying street
people piecework rates to generate filled-out cards.

Registration fraud is annoying to the voter registrar's office
because it forces the brainless shitwork sorting out the trash
from the valid registrations, but it has -0- impact on the
outcome of elections.

I could register all 1.3 billion Chinese in Kern County and,
apart from giving my local registrar a heart attack, it would
have no impact at all on the outcome of any election.

FOR THE VERY STUPID (that is, pretty much anyone who will still
admits to being a Republican in public): the hard bit is showing
that Acorn activity has caused actual *ballot* fraud, let alone
actually changed outcome of any elections.

Apart from a few noise-level instances, I am not aware of any
evidence of meaningful Acorn *ballot* fraud, and off-hand I don't
know of *any* election where the outcome was affected.  (Though
there's gotta be a dogcatcher race affected somewhere, with some
tens of thousands of politicians elected every cycle in America.)

DON'T BE STUPID.  If you want to engage in this discussion, bring
in some examples of actual Acorn *ballot* fraud that affected the
actual outcome of one or more elections.

Love, Wolf.

On 2009-11-18, Pro.Si.Mi <s...@i.an> wrote:

...

read more »


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dave Bugg  
View profile  
 More options Nov 20, 6:37 pm
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: "Dave Bugg" <davebu...@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:37:51 -0800
Local: Fri, Nov 20 2009 6:37 pm
Subject: Re: Election by appearance
Wolf Leverich wrote:

....snip

> DON'T BE STUPID.  If you want to engage in this discussion, bring
> in some examples of actual Acorn *ballot* fraud that affected the
> actual outcome of one or more elections.

> Love, Wolf.

You asked for evidence of ACORN fraud and it was presented. Now you try to
change the parameter of your question. YAWN. So typical. During the
time-frame of the reported ACORN fraud in Washington State (see the cite
below) the governor's race that year hinged on less than 200 votes. It
involved re-counts and a court battle. The ACORN fraud was discovered well
AFTER the democrat governor was sworn in. The ACORN fraud was definitely
seen as driving the outcome of that race.

...

read more »


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Moderate  
View profile  
 More options Nov 21, 12:37 am
Newsgroups: rec.backcountry
From: "Moderate" <no_spam_@no_mail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:37:01 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 21 2009 12:37 am
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

"Dave Bugg" <davebu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:Y5Cdnc6SlNnL2pvWnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@giganews.com...

He changed the parameter of his question several weeks ago.  His argument
that Republicans commit more voter fraud than Democrats fell flat on its
face so he changed the subject.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Wolf Leverich  
View profile  
 More options Nov 21, 5:31 am
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: "Wolf Leverich" <lever...@linkpendium.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:31:45 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sat, Nov 21 2009 5:31 am
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

WE HAVE ANOTHER WINNER!

Yet another Republican with 3rd-grade reading comprehension skills!
You prolly think there were WMD in Iraq and the Earth is 6,000 years
old, too, right ?

I wrote, and you quoted it below, "So where's the evidence of
massive organized ACORN *ballot* fraud?"  And you are so stupid
that you think serving up all the well-known instances of
registration fraud by ACORN's street-people canvassers has something
to do with *ballot* fraud.

Imbecile.

And the Washington state governorship was prolly one of the most
litigated elections ever held.  At the end of the day, the Republicans
basically got laughed out of court.  Talking about that election
as an example of fraud is something only as stupid as Sarah Palin
could possibly do.

Grow a brain.  Or Darwin yourself.  You're bad news for the party.

Love, Wolf.

On 2009-11-20, Dave Bugg <davebu...@yahoo.com> wrote:

...

read more »


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Wolf Leverich  
View profile  
 More options Nov 21, 5:44 am
Newsgroups: rec.backcountry
From: "Wolf Leverich" <lever...@linkpendium.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:44:54 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sat, Nov 21 2009 5:44 am
Subject: Re: Election by appearance
On 2009-11-20, Moderate <no_spam_@no_mail.com> wrote:

Better reading comprehension skills than most.  ;)

But I don't think I would have argued that Republicans
commit more voter fraud, or at least *ballot* fraud, than
Democrats.  I'd have to look at the current stats.

Some things like the Ohio 2004 post-game play look interesting
from that perspective, but I don't know how that election was
stolen so it's pretty much an exercise in empty paranoia
talking about it.

What is true is that Republicans engage in wholesale voter
*suppression*.  It's what conservatives *do*, because we're
only about a quarter of the population and the main trick to
winning is preventing the bad guys in the other 3/4ths of
the population from voting.

We'd be living here in Sweden if we actually let democracy work.  ;)

Fortunately Democratic turnout is naturally lower than Republican
turnout, and the nice-nice pansies over on their side just suck
it up when we disenfranchise them by the tens of thousands in the
pre-game festivities.

Love, Wolf.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dave Bugg  
View profile  
 More options Nov 21, 7:28 am
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: "Dave Bugg" <davebu...@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:28:38 -0800
Local: Sat, Nov 21 2009 7:28 am
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

Wolf Leverich wrote:
> WE HAVE ANOTHER WINNER!

> Yet another Republican with 3rd-grade reading comprehension skills!
> You prolly think there were WMD in Iraq and the Earth is 6,000 years
> old, too, right ?

Translation: "Oops, shown up again to be the massive twit that I am."

> I wrote, and you quoted it below, ....

Blah, blah, blah. Nice try at misdirection, but it doesn't work. What was
show was that in Washington State, the amount of fraud that was caught, was
indicative of the broader base of fraudulent ballots that got through. That
was the reason why the number of ballots cast and COUNTED did not match, by
the hundreds, the number of registered voters.

> Imbecile.

Shank-puller

> And the Washington state governorship was prolly one of the most
> litigated elections ever held.

Not really, but we are waiting for you to tie this into some sort of point
rather than as a silly, ignorant rant.

>  At the end of the day, the Republicans
> basically got laughed out of court.

That's interesting. Since I live in Wenatchee (where the case was heard) and
attended most of the sessions (including the decision that was handed down),
I saw no evidence of laughter. I observed massive relief exhibited by the
council representing Gregoire's side. I also observed both sides
tongue-lashing the King County Auditor's Office, along with stated
disappointment in Sam Reed's office (and of course you know who he is since
you state a great familiarity with Washington State's elections)

But then I must've missed you in court. You were their weren't you? You
wrote like you were.

>  Talking about that election
> as an example of fraud is something only as stupid as Sarah Palin
> could possibly do.

Ahhhh, no facts so let's toss around self-percieved bad-things.
Bwahahahahahahah!!!!

> Grow a brain.

Why? Need one?

>  Or Darwin yourself.

Makes a great Halloween costume. But then you knew Halloween was over,
right?

> You're bad news for the party.

What party? OH, you think I belong to a party and junk. Braaaaaaaak. Wrong
again. Do you ever have any facts or do you just live on suppositions?
--
Dave
What is best in life?    "To crush your enemies, see them driven before
you, and to hear the lamentation of the women." -- Conan

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Pro.Si.Mi  
View profile  
 More options Nov 21, 7:55 am
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: "Pro.Si.Mi" <s...@i.an>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:55:19 -0700
Local: Sat, Nov 21 2009 7:55 am
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

Wolf Leverich wrote:
> Grow a brain.  Or Darwin yourself.  You're bad news for the party.

> Love, Wolf.

Put a bullet through your useless head, then we can all have a party,
dipshit.

Hate, Pro.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Pro.Si.Mi  
View profile  
 More options Nov 21, 7:56 am
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: "Pro.Si.Mi" <s...@i.an>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:56:33 -0700
Local: Sat, Nov 21 2009 7:56 am
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

Wolf Leverich wrote:
> YOU ARE A MORON.

YOU ARE A LIAR.

Hate, Pro.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Pro.Si.Mi  
View profile  
 More options Nov 21, 7:59 am
Newsgroups: tx.guns, mn.politics, talk.politics.guns, rec.backcountry
From: "Pro.Si.Mi" <s...@i.an>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:59:59 -0700
Local: Sat, Nov 21 2009 7:59 am
Subject: Re: Election by appearance

You'd be amazed what an egomaniac he is.

Get him to tell you all bout his mansion and net worth.

He will, trust me...

http://www.eogen.com/LeverichBrian


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 226 - 250 of 258 < Older  Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google