<do.not.send.s...@this.address> wrote:
> Once Upon a Midnight Dreary, While Joan in GB-W Pondered, Weak and
> Weary, Over Many a Quaint and Curious Forgotten Post,  s/he wrote:
>  --------------------------------------------------------------
> >Hi JohnP

> >I would imagine this has been called to your attention before now . . . but
> >in case not . . . and for your other RAM friends who did not see it.

> >While reading The Playboy Advisor this morning (PLAYBOY April 2008) I came
> >across a question from a reader who is interested in becoming a sperm donor.
> >This person wants to meet the potential people he helps and asks Playboy how
> >to do this.

> >In their reply Playboy  lists several good reasons why knowing the person
> >who receives your sperm is not a good idea, including the one where the
> >recipient can sue and usually win support from the donor if he is known.
> >They add this exception, and they add it in parenthesis, and so will I.  (A
> >notable exception occurred in January in Pennsylvania, where the state
> >supreme court ruled that a man who donated sperm to a loved did not owe
> >support.  The justices said to rule otherwise would undermine women's right
> >to use known donors.)

> >Sounds familiar?

> >Joan

> Wow. I always wanted to be in Playboy. I think.

> Now I have an excuse to buy a copy, and my wife can't get mad when I
> bring it home. "Look, Jan, I didn't buy it for the pictures. My case
> is in it." ;)

> Thanks for letting me know.

> I wonder if April's is still on the stands? It's now May. Usually they
> have July's out by now.