"Jr@Ease" <do.not.send.s...@this.address> wrote in message

> Once Upon a Midnight Dreary, While Joan in GB-W Pondered, Weak and
> Weary, Over Many a Quaint and Curious Forgotten Post,  s/he wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>>Hi JohnP

>>I would imagine this has been called to your attention before now . . .
>>but
>>in case not . . . and for your other RAM friends who did not see it.

>>While reading The Playboy Advisor this morning (PLAYBOY April 2008) I came
>>across a question from a reader who is interested in becoming a sperm
>>donor.
>>This person wants to meet the potential people he helps and asks Playboy
>>how
>>to do this.

>>In their reply Playboy  lists several good reasons why knowing the person
>>who receives your sperm is not a good idea, including the one where the
>>recipient can sue and usually win support from the donor if he is known.
>>They add this exception, and they add it in parenthesis, and so will I.
>>(A
>>notable exception occurred in January in Pennsylvania, where the state
>>supreme court ruled that a man who donated sperm to a loved did not owe
>>support.  The justices said to rule otherwise would undermine women's
>>right
>>to use known donors.)

>>Sounds familiar?

>>Joan

> Wow. I always wanted to be in Playboy. I think.

> Now I have an excuse to buy a copy, and my wife can't get mad when I
> bring it home. "Look, Jan, I didn't buy it for the pictures. My case
> is in it." ;)

> Thanks for letting me know.

> I wonder if April's is still on the stands? It's now May. Usually they
> have July's out by now.

> John P