>"Jr@Ease" <do.not.send.s...@this.address> wrote in message
>news:p4qo241h4o3pbsl9u3nfqf1qlcl836usrc@4ax.com...
>> Once Upon a Midnight Dreary, While Joan in GB-W Pondered, Weak and
>> Weary, Over Many a Quaint and Curious Forgotten Post,  s/he wrote:
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>>>Hi JohnP

>>>I would imagine this has been called to your attention before now . . .
>>>but
>>>in case not . . . and for your other RAM friends who did not see it.

>>>While reading The Playboy Advisor this morning (PLAYBOY April 2008) I came
>>>across a question from a reader who is interested in becoming a sperm
>>>donor.
>>>This person wants to meet the potential people he helps and asks Playboy
>>>how
>>>to do this.

>>>In their reply Playboy  lists several good reasons why knowing the person
>>>who receives your sperm is not a good idea, including the one where the
>>>recipient can sue and usually win support from the donor if he is known.
>>>They add this exception, and they add it in parenthesis, and so will I.
>>>(A
>>>notable exception occurred in January in Pennsylvania, where the state
>>>supreme court ruled that a man who donated sperm to a loved did not owe
>>>support.  The justices said to rule otherwise would undermine women's
>>>right
>>>to use known donors.)

>>>Sounds familiar?

>>>Joan

>> Wow. I always wanted to be in Playboy. I think.

>> Now I have an excuse to buy a copy, and my wife can't get mad when I
>> bring it home. "Look, Jan, I didn't buy it for the pictures. My case
>> is in it." ;)

>> Thanks for letting me know.

>> I wonder if April's is still on the stands? It's now May. Usually they
>> have July's out by now.

>> John P

>Let me know if you can't find a copy.  I can always send you ours.

>Joan