>I would imagine this has been called to your attention before now . . . but
>in case not . . . and for your other RAM friends who did not see it.

>While reading The Playboy Advisor this morning (PLAYBOY April 2008) I came
>across a question from a reader who is interested in becoming a sperm donor.
>This person wants to meet the potential people he helps and asks Playboy how
>to do this.

>In their reply Playboy  lists several good reasons why knowing the person
>who receives your sperm is not a good idea, including the one where the
>recipient can sue and usually win support from the donor if he is known.
>They add this exception, and they add it in parenthesis, and so will I.  (A
>notable exception occurred in January in Pennsylvania, where the state
>supreme court ruled that a man who donated sperm to a loved did not owe
>support.  The justices said to rule otherwise would undermine women's right
>to use known donors.)

>Sounds familiar?

>Joan