>>>>I would imagine this has been called to your attention before now . . .
>>>>but
>>>>in case not . . . and for your other RAM friends who did not see it.

>>>>While reading The Playboy Advisor this morning (PLAYBOY April 2008) I
>>>>came
>>>>across a question from a reader who is interested in becoming a sperm
>>>>donor.
>>>>This person wants to meet the potential people he helps and asks Playboy
>>>>how
>>>>to do this.

>>>>In their reply Playboy  lists several good reasons why knowing the
>>>>person
>>>>who receives your sperm is not a good idea, including the one where the
>>>>recipient can sue and usually win support from the donor if he is known.
>>>>They add this exception, and they add it in parenthesis, and so will I.
>>>>(A
>>>>notable exception occurred in January in Pennsylvania, where the state
>>>>supreme court ruled that a man who donated sperm to a loved did not owe
>>>>support.  The justices said to rule otherwise would undermine women's
>>>>right
>>>>to use known donors.)

>>>>Sounds familiar?

>>>>Joan

>>> Wow. I always wanted to be in Playboy. I think.

>>> Now I have an excuse to buy a copy, and my wife can't get mad when I
>>> bring it home. "Look, Jan, I didn't buy it for the pictures. My case
>>> is in it." ;)

>>> Thanks for letting me know.

>>> I wonder if April's is still on the stands? It's now May. Usually they
>>> have July's out by now.

>>> John P

>>Let me know if you can't find a copy.  I can always send you ours.

>>Joan

> I have a friend who gets it, I'll ask him. And Beeg just emailed a
> copy of the page in question. She said she got it off the internet.
> I wonder... ;)

> John P