Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
rationale
Home
+ new post
Pages
Files
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion use in court?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Tim van Gelder Austhink  
View profile  
 More options Apr 28, 9:45 pm
From: Tim van Gelder Austhink <t...@austhink.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:45:10 +1000
Local: Tues, Apr 28 2009 9:45 pm
Subject: use in court?
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

I was asked "Have any judges in Australia (or anywhere else) ever accepted
the use of *Rationale* by trial or appellate counsel to sketch an argument
about the evidence in a case?"

I know one judge has at least threatened to require Rationale
use<http://www.scribd.com/doc/309694/US-Department-of-Justice-Court-Proce...>but
do not recall hearing of any examples of this actually happening.

Any pointers?

- Tim v.G.

--
Austhink - bringing visual clarity to complex issues
Level 50, 120 Collins St Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia
www.austhinkconsulting.com
Ph +61 3 9225 5215 ext 102  Mob 0438 131 266  Skype, LinkedIn timvangelder
Blog timvangelder.com


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google