|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: Jeff Young <jyoung.o...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Aug 16 2008 11:17 am
Subject: Re: Aggregation/Resource Map relationship question
On Aug 14, 3:49 pm, Simeon Warner <sim...@cs.cornell.edu> wrote:
> > "An Aggregation does not have a representation..."
I think I see the source of my confusion now. This isn't the
> > "the Aggregation URI A-1 must yield or lead to a Resource Map when > > dereferenced." > > Is this still the current thinking? If so, what's wrong with Resource
> Well, this is a difference between English and the Architecture of the
difference between English and AWWW et al. It's the difference between HTTP and those other things. From an HTTP perspective, a Resource Map would make for a perfectly reasonable representation. If the documents that have been cited so far explain this somewhere I might accept it, although it is damned confusing of them to redefine words like "representation" that way. Jeff You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||