There are quite a few newsgroups (see below) are spammed heavily. I have notified spams in google groups. But I still see those spams. I'm wondering if there is a way clear the spams.
Peng Yu wrote: > There are quite a few newsgroups (see below) are spammed heavily. I > have notified spams in google groups. But I still see those spams. I'm > wondering if there is a way clear the spams.
> comp.unix.shell > comp.text.xml
A filtered server? Works great in my opinion.
--
"You may have noticed that I continue to use the term 'open-carry' rather than "OC" This is avoid confusion with Oleoresin Capsicum, a Latin term meaning 'Give me some water, bitch. This sh*t is melting my eyeballs.'" - dawg23
> Peng Yu wrote: >> There are quite a few newsgroups (see below) are spammed heavily. I >> have notified spams in google groups. But I still see those spams. I'm >> wondering if there is a way clear the spams.
>> comp.unix.shell >> comp.text.xml
> A filtered server? Works in my great opinion.
Where did you get all that knowledge from at your young age, Windbag? Cuuudos!
> > Peng Yu wrote: > >> There are quite a few newsgroups (see below) are spammed heavily. I > >> have notified spams in google groups. But I still see those spams. I'm > >> wondering if there is a way clear the spams.
> >> comp.unix.shell > >> comp.text.xml
> > A filtered server? Works in my great opinion.
> Where did you get all that knowledge from at your young age, Windbag? > Cuuudos!
Was there any special reason you 'neglected' to account for Xavier's response, or were you too clueless to comprehend that as well?
BTW, you *do* realize that you violate netiquette and are a net-abuser yourself, don't you?
>>> Peng Yu wrote: >>>> There are quite a few newsgroups (see below) are spammed heavily. I >>>> have notified spams in google groups. But I still see those spams. I'm >>>> wondering if there is a way clear the spams.
>>>> comp.unix.shell >>>> comp.text.xml
>>> A filtered server? Works in my great opinion.
>> Where did you get all that knowledge from at your young age, Windbag? >> Cuuudos!
> Was there any special reason you 'neglected' to account for Xavier's > response, or were you too clueless to comprehend that as well?
Are you aware that the Windbag actually felt the need to instruct a Google poster who most likely has no idea about what the Windbag and Roche were talking about? Both could just have stated that they can NOT do anything about the spam on Google.
> BTW, you *do* realize that you violate netiquette and are a net-abuser > yourself, don't you?
Xavier Roche wrote: > WindsorFox<[SS]> a écrit : >> A filtered server? Works great in my opinion.
> Yep. I just checked comp.unix.shell and over 1625 messages, 0 spams > spotted on a server with cleanfeed and NoCeM.
To be honest I wouldn't be terribly hurt if Geoff were to sift out all of Google, but that is a tad draconian. I can count on one hand the # of spam messages I see in a year on a group.
--
"You may have noticed that I continue to use the term 'open-carry' rather than "OC" This is avoid confusion with Oleoresin Capsicum, a Latin term meaning 'Give me some water, bitch. This sh*t is melting my eyeballs.'" - dawg23
The Peeler wrote: >> Peng Yu wrote: >>> There are quite a few newsgroups (see below) are spammed heavily. I >>> have notified spams in google groups. But I still see those spams. I'm >>> wondering if there is a way clear the spams.
>>> comp.unix.shell >>> comp.text.xml >> A filtered server? Works in my great opinion.
> Where did you get all that knowledge from at your young age, Windbag? > Cuuudos!
Where'd you get that stick up your ass, douchebag?
--
"You may have noticed that I continue to use the term 'open-carry' rather than "OC" This is avoid confusion with Oleoresin Capsicum, a Latin term meaning 'Give me some water, bitch. This sh*t is melting my eyeballs.'" - dawg23
Frank Slootweg wrote: > The Peeler <peeling...@sick.admin> wrote: >>> Peng Yu wrote: >>>> There are quite a few newsgroups (see below) are spammed heavily. I >>>> have notified spams in google groups. But I still see those spams. I'm >>>> wondering if there is a way clear the spams.
>>>> comp.unix.shell >>>> comp.text.xml >>> A filtered server? Works in my great opinion. >> Where did you get all that knowledge from at your young age, Windbag? >> Cuuudos!
> Was there any special reason you 'neglected' to account for Xavier's > response, or were you too clueless to comprehend that as well?
> BTW, you *do* realize that you violate netiquette and are a net-abuser > yourself, don't you?
I thinks he's "winning" the "battle" when he says something that he thinks is pithy against me or Ray. Kind of on the same level as Moris was.
--
"You may have noticed that I continue to use the term 'open-carry' rather than "OC" This is avoid confusion with Oleoresin Capsicum, a Latin term meaning 'Give me some water, bitch. This sh*t is melting my eyeballs.'" - dawg23
The Peeler wrote: >> The Peeler <peeling...@sick.admin> wrote: >>>> Peng Yu wrote: >>>>> There are quite a few newsgroups (see below) are spammed heavily. I >>>>> have notified spams in google groups. But I still see those spams. I'm >>>>> wondering if there is a way clear the spams.
>>>>> comp.unix.shell >>>>> comp.text.xml >>>> A filtered server? Works in my great opinion. >>> Where did you get all that knowledge from at your young age, Windbag? >>> Cuuudos! >> Was there any special reason you 'neglected' to account for Xavier's >> response, or were you too clueless to comprehend that as well?
> Are you aware that the Windbag actually felt the need to instruct a Google > poster who most likely has no idea about what the Windbag and Roche were > talking about? Both could just have stated that they can NOT do anything > about the spam on Google.
>> BTW, you *do* realize that you violate netiquette and are a net-abuser >> yourself, don't you?
> Abuse of the Windbag is NOT abuse of the NET! <g>
It does not matter douchebag, my reply was a constructive answer to the question. Yours, not so much. You're not funny, not even insulting and not even a third rate troll. I've been insulted by far better than you in my 17 or so years on Usenet.
--
"You may have noticed that I continue to use the term 'open-carry' rather than "OC" This is avoid confusion with Oleoresin Capsicum, a Latin term meaning 'Give me some water, bitch. This sh*t is melting my eyeballs.'" - dawg23
>> Abuse of the Windbag is NOT abuse of the NET! <g>
> It does not matter douchebag, my reply was a constructive answer to > the question. Yours, not so much. You're not funny, not even insulting > and not even a third rate troll. I've been insulted by far better than > you in my 17 or so years on Usenet.
I don't even intend to "insult" in a big way, Windbag. You are right, for once: I'm certainly no troll. I simply tend to expose. Especially inflated windbags like you.
> The Peeler wrote: >>> Peng Yu wrote: >>>> There are quite a few newsgroups (see below) are spammed heavily. I >>>> have notified spams in google groups. But I still see those spams. I'm >>>> wondering if there is a way clear the spams.
>>>> comp.unix.shell >>>> comp.text.xml >>> A filtered server? Works in my great opinion.
>> Where did you get all that knowledge from at your young age, Windbag? >> Cuuudos!
> Where'd you get that stick up your ass, douchebag?
You didn't feel flattered by my praise of your knowledge, Windbag? Are you perhaps slowly catching on? NO, that can and will never be! lol
The Peeler wrote: >>> Abuse of the Windbag is NOT abuse of the NET! <g>
>> It does not matter douchebag, my reply was a constructive answer to >> the question. Yours, not so much. You're not funny, not even insulting >> and not even a third rate troll. I've been insulted by far better than >> you in my 17 or so years on Usenet.
> I don't even intend to "insult" in a big way, Windbag. You are right, for > once: I'm certainly no troll. I simply tend to expose. Especially inflated > windbags like you.
You aren't good at any of it and the only thing you have exposed are your own faults and lacking points. You sit there making maturity quips that are third grade level at best; laughing like any of it is amusing you're the clearing house for what you accused me of. You're as insane as Wollman, lamie or Moris. And your abuse towards any constructive replies further show your lack of maturity, sanity, and of any good reason to be here. You have yet since the day you started posting managed to make any post that was worthwhile or meaningful. Mine generally are unless I am replying to some drivel spewing idiot such as yourself. Your ONLY purpose here was to cause trouble, now show a contradiction to that I dare you. I know you won't because you can not. You'll make some third grade quip, almost certainly one you've already used and then laugh as if it were funny. How truly pathetic...
--
"You may have noticed that I continue to use the term 'open-carry' rather than "OC" This is avoid confusion with Oleoresin Capsicum, a Latin term meaning 'Give me some water, bitch. This sh*t is melting my eyeballs.'" - dawg23
> You aren't good at any of it and the only thing you have exposed are > your own faults and lacking points. You sit there making maturity quips > that are third grade level at best; laughing like any of it is amusing > you're the clearing house for what you accused me of. You're as insane > as Wollman, lamie or Moris. And your abuse towards any constructive > replies further show your lack of maturity, sanity, and of any good > reason to be here. You have yet since the day you started posting > managed to make any post that was worthwhile or meaningful. Mine > generally are unless I am replying to some drivel spewing idiot such as > yourself. Your ONLY purpose here was to cause trouble, now show a > contradiction to that I dare you. I know you won't because you can not. > You'll make some third grade quip, almost certainly one you've already > used and then laugh as if it were funny. How truly pathetic...
Reading your typical, amusing tripe above: has anyone ever called you a "Windbag" yet? LMAO!
The Peeler wrote: >> You aren't good at any of it and the only thing you have exposed are >> your own faults and lacking points. You sit there making maturity quips >> that are third grade level at best; laughing like any of it is amusing >> you're the clearing house for what you accused me of. You're as insane >> as Wollman, lamie or Moris. And your abuse towards any constructive >> replies further show your lack of maturity, sanity, and of any good >> reason to be here. You have yet since the day you started posting >> managed to make any post that was worthwhile or meaningful. Mine >> generally are unless I am replying to some drivel spewing idiot such as >> yourself. Your ONLY purpose here was to cause trouble, now show a >> contradiction to that I dare you. I know you won't because you can not. >> You'll make some third grade quip, almost certainly one you've already >> used and then laugh as if it were funny. How truly pathetic...
> Reading your typical, amusing tripe above: has anyone ever called you a > "Windbag" yet? LMAO!
Point proven.
-- .
Well, it was important enough for several folks to comment on. Fortunately, they were not burdened by Microsoft shitware which fails to properly implement a decade-old standard. - Sam
> The Peeler wrote: >>> You aren't good at any of it and the only thing you have exposed are >>> your own faults and lacking points. You sit there making maturity quips >>> that are third grade level at best; laughing like any of it is amusing >>> you're the clearing house for what you accused me of. You're as insane >>> as Wollman, lamie or Moris. And your abuse towards any constructive >>> replies further show your lack of maturity, sanity, and of any good >>> reason to be here. You have yet since the day you started posting >>> managed to make any post that was worthwhile or meaningful. Mine >>> generally are unless I am replying to some drivel spewing idiot such as >>> yourself. Your ONLY purpose here was to cause trouble, now show a >>> contradiction to that I dare you. I know you won't because you can not. >>> You'll make some third grade quip, almost certainly one you've already >>> used and then laugh as if it were funny. How truly pathetic...
>> Reading your typical, amusing tripe above: has anyone ever called you a >> "Windbag" yet? LMAO!
> Point proven.
Which point? The point that you are a Windbag? Definitely!
|
