> In article <4AE8D11C.1...@earthlink.net> > "Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturian...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Chris Krolczyk wrote:
> > > On Oct 25, 11:23 am, The True Edmond Wollmann <EHWollm...@aol.com> > > > wrote: > > > > Wrong, defamer boy. Keep it up, your obvious malicious intent to cause > > > > me damage to my career and reputation for 12 years is being > > > > documented. Run away again now, and get some real legal advice.
> > > I fail to see how a link to a scanned envelope constitutes > > > "defamation", Edmo. Then again, only you're stupid enough to > > > believe it does.
> > Defamation= Injuring someone's character or reputation by making false > > and malicious statements about him to other people.
> Or her in your case. You slandered Lili and Susan, two women > who went out of their way to help you and you fucked them over.
Wrong, two women who tried to buy me and when they couldn't turned to stalking, harassing, defaming and bringing personal information onto the web, and then crying because I did the same to refute their lies and they were exposed for the shalllow egomaniacle frauds that they truly are.
>> In article <4AE8D11C.1...@earthlink.net> >> "Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturian...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> > Chris Krolczyk wrote:
>> > > On Oct 25, 11:23 am, The True Edmond Wollmann >> > > <EHWollm...@aol.com> wrote: >> > > > Wrong, defamer boy. Keep it up, your obvious malicious intent >> > > > to cause me damage to my career and reputation for 12 years is >> > > > being documented. Run away again now, and get some real legal >> > > > advice.
>> > > I fail to see how a link to a scanned envelope constitutes >> > > "defamation", Edmo. Then again, only you're stupid enough to >> > > believe it does.
>> > Defamation= Injuring someone's character or reputation by making >> > false and malicious statements about him to other people.
>> Or her in your case. You slandered Lili and Susan, two women >> who went out of their way to help you and you fucked them over.
> Wrong, two women who tried to buy me
You aren't worth very much. But you're the one who claimed that Lili was on food stamps, Susan was almost broke and you were the richest, most successful person in the world. You're a fucking liar.
> and when they couldn't turned to > stalking, harassing, defaming and bringing personal information
No, Susan checked into Usenet to find you trashing her and she ripped into you with the truth. Lili eventually figured out you're an asshole and after you tried to not repay her got her land sharks to get you to fork over the money you owed.
> onto > the web, and then crying because I did the same to refute their lies > and they were exposed for the shalllow egomaniacle frauds that they > truly are.
How did you do that? You posted private email that you edited. You've been exposed as a fraud, deadbeat and a liar.
-- Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895. "Be careful though, your kookshit about how I am this and that will reveal who the real kook is." - Edmo in PKB mode.
> >> In article <4AE8D11C.1...@earthlink.net> > >> "Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturian...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >> > Chris Krolczyk wrote:
> >> > > On Oct 25, 11:23 am, The True Edmond Wollmann > >> > > <EHWollm...@aol.com> wrote: > >> > > > Wrong, defamer boy. Keep it up, your obvious malicious intent > >> > > > to cause me damage to my career and reputation for 12 years is > >> > > > being documented. Run away again now, and get some real legal > >> > > > advice.
> >> > > I fail to see how a link to a scanned envelope constitutes > >> > > "defamation", Edmo. Then again, only you're stupid enough to > >> > > believe it does.
> >> > Defamation= Injuring someone's character or reputation by making > >> > false and malicious statements about him to other people.
> >> Or her in your case. You slandered Lili and Susan, two women > >> who went out of their way to help you and you fucked them over. > > Wrong, two women who tried to buy me > You aren't worth very much. But you're the one who claimed that Lili was > on food stamps,
I don't know iof she was "on" them, but I used to work for the county social services and I have a friend who works there now, and you can't get them legally without reporting your income etc. All I know is she had them when I was visiting her because I saw them.
>Susan was almost broke
Never said such a thing, why don't you ever provide evidence for your lies? Susan told me she was filthy rich (stores all over etc.) and that her father was in Alaska politics. Could have been lies I don't know, I just assumed she was telling the truth. She insisted that she wanted to give me money and that I not even try to pay it back, I was a starving student and probably shouldn't have taken it even so she said that. After I broke up with her it suddenly became a loan. She gave me a scanner for Christmas . Thats it.
>and you were the richest, most > successful person in the world. You're a fucking liar.
Never said that, WHERE is that statement? I have never said such a thing, but you have said a whole lot of shit not true.
> > and when they couldn't turned to > > stalking, harassing, defaming and bringing personal information > No, Susan checked into Usenet to find you trashing her and she ripped > into you with the truth.
I wasn't trashing her, I suspected her of trashing me, then she actually did because of my suspicion (I guess to prove she was?) and then she started lying.
>Lili eventually figured out you're an asshole > and after you tried to not repay her got her land sharks to get you to > fork over the money you owed.
No, that's not what happened asshole. I WAS THERE. She was always drunk and fucked up on drugs and shit and she FORGOT that I was repaying her for a loan she gave me at the end of August and halfway through the month accused me of not paying her because she was delusional. I then paid her immediately anyway and the fact that she did that to me for no reason ended our relationship. BY ME. She has just recently asking to be my friend on facebook, I let her be. She said "I wish ther was something I could do to make up for that past" and I said there is; and I asked her to RECANT her lie on usenet, she did not do it, so I blocked her on Facebook and told her goodbye forever. THAT is the true story, fuckhead.
> > onto > > the web, and then crying because I did the same to refute their lies > > and they were exposed for the shalllow egomaniacle frauds that they > > truly are. > How did you do that? You posted private email that you edited. You've > been exposed as a fraud, deadbeat and a liar.
Because Susan said she loaned me the money (after I dumped her), when the email clearly shows she insisted it was a gift and not to even try to pay it back. Please try to clear your brain of DEAD CELLS so you can follow along you fraud.
"Don't you hear any voices cryin'? That's the sound of my love dyin' Here comes the rain. You don't know how to play the game, You cheat! You lie! You don't even know how to saaay goodbye!! You make me wanna cry! You don't knooooow. You don't even know how to say goodbye!!! You make me wanna cry!! You don't even know how to say goodbye!!! You make me wanna cryCry...Crrrrrrrryyyyyyyyyyyyy" Godley and Creme, Cry
> On Oct 29, 1:43 pm, Cujo DeSockpuppet <c...@petitmorte.net> wrote: >> "Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturian...@earthlink.net> wrote >> innews:4AE9B6CC.3 > A...@earthlink.net: >> > SSN Gateway wrote:
>> >> In article <4AE8D11C.1...@earthlink.net> >> >> "Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturian...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >> > Chris Krolczyk wrote:
>> >> > > On Oct 25, 11:23 am, The True Edmond Wollmann >> >> > > <EHWollm...@aol.com> wrote: >> >> > > > Wrong, defamer boy. Keep it up, your obvious malicious >> >> > > > intent to cause me damage to my career and reputation for 12 >> >> > > > years is being documented. Run away again now, and get some >> >> > > > real legal advice.
>> >> > > I fail to see how a link to a scanned envelope constitutes >> >> > > "defamation", Edmo. Then again, only you're stupid enough to >> >> > > believe it does.
>> >> > Defamation= Injuring someone's character or reputation by making >> >> > false and malicious statements about him to other people.
>> >> Or her in your case. You slandered Lili and Susan, two women >> >> who went out of their way to help you and you fucked them over.
>> > Wrong, two women who tried to buy me
>> You aren't worth very much. But you're the one who claimed that Lili >> was on food stamps,
> I don't know iof she was "on" them, but I used to work for the county > social services and I have a friend who works there now, and you can't > get them legally without reporting your income etc. All I know is she > had them when I was visiting her because I saw them.
You sure didn't have a problem grabbing them out of her purse to tip the valet at the restaurant you freeloaded at, deadbeat.
>>Susan was almost broke
> Never said such a thing,
Liar.
> why don't you ever provide evidence for your > lies? Susan told me she was filthy rich (stores all over etc.) and > that her father was in Alaska politics. Could have been lies I don't > know, I just assumed she was telling the truth. She insisted that she > wanted to give me money and that I not even try to pay it back, I was > a starving student and probably shouldn't have taken it even so she > said that. After I broke up with her it suddenly became a loan. She > gave me a scanner for Christmas . Thats it.
Liar.
>>and you were the richest, most >> successful person in the world. You're a fucking liar.
> Never said that, WHERE is that statement? I have never said such a > thing, but you have said a whole lot of shit not true.
You lie again. Pantyhead.
>> > and when they couldn't turned to >> > stalking, harassing, defaming and bringing personal information
>> No, Susan checked into Usenet to find you trashing her and she ripped >> into you with the truth.
> I wasn't trashing her, I suspected her of trashing me, then she > actually did because of my suspicion (I guess to prove she was?) and > then she started lying.
How credible do you think you are? Anyone reading this would say you're a first class asshole.
>>Lili eventually figured out you're an asshole >> and after you tried to not repay her got her land sharks to get you >> to fork over the money you owed.
> No, that's not what happened asshole. I WAS THERE. She was always > drunk and fucked up on drugs and shit and she FORGOT that I was > repaying her for a loan she gave me at the end of August and halfway > through the month accused me of not paying her because she was > delusional. I then paid her immediately anyway and the fact that she > did that to me for no reason ended our relationship. BY ME. She has > just recently asking to be my friend on facebook, I let her be. She > said "I wish ther was something I could do to make up for that past" > and I said there is; and I asked her to RECANT her lie on usenet, she > did not do it, so I blocked her on Facebook and told her goodbye > forever. > THAT is the true story, fuckhead.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!1!!! You got trolled. Lili still thinks you're an asshole.
>> > onto >> > the web, and then crying because I did the same to refute their >> > lies and they were exposed for the shalllow egomaniacle frauds that >> > they truly are.
>> How did you do that? You posted private email that you edited. You've >> been exposed as a fraud, deadbeat and a liar.
> Because Susan said she loaned me the money (after I dumped her), when > the email clearly shows she insisted it was a gift and not to even try > to pay it back. Please try to clear your brain of DEAD CELLS so you > can follow along you fraud.
We're back to the email you edited, are we? This is why you're a scumbag.
-- Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895. "At the moment, half the spool of this group is subsequent to things that I wrote. That bores the hell out of me too." - Fucknozzle Jr.
From: Dave U. Random <anonym...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net> Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software. Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer administrator at <ab...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net>. Cc: mail2n...@dizum.com, mail2n...@m2n.gabrix.ath.cx References: <slrnhe6odu.o2m.sb...@sun.smbtech.com> <64f143fa-8eda-4839-b24e-254c1e9dd...@a6g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
Not only do you send invalid DMCA reports, now you go and send invalid spam reports. For a spam report, you should send the copy of the spam in it's entirety. You have invalidated it by changing the links.
> > > Somebody who disagrees with you, or the nonsesense fake science of > > > Astrology, is not spam.
> > > Edmond is a CENSOR!
> > Religious nutbars who do no research
> That'd be you, kookboi. Not "Eddie".
> >express no opinion,
> He *expressed* an opinion, Edmo. Learn to read.
> >this is called > > bigotry.
> Whine "SP1N1C!" some more for us, dope.
> -Chris Krolczyk
Thank you for your response. It seems that there is an inability to stay focused on, or to deal with, the issues at hand. I am not really interested nor inclined to attempt to resolve personal intonations implicate in these responses. Astrology is the alt.group hierarchy topic for this group.
If my posts serve you use them-if they don't, don't. I do not ask anyone to believe ANYTHING I say simply on the basis that I said it.
One must take responsibility for their psychological reactions in interactions with others that are not conducive to logical resolutions, nurturing insight, or inspired conversation-and reframe them. I would really rather discuss issues rather than personalities (which is fallacious) and wish you the best in your pursuits. It is my sincere hope that you can rid yourself of this negativity and pettyness. I have faith that you can, regardless of how miserable you insist on being.
Although healthy competition is always a catalyst, I feel that this component is out of control and is interfering in this case. I find it unproductive and would rather not waste time in sarcasm and or blaming. Time is very important to me and I enjoy personal development and spirited conversation. I post on usenet with the intention of learning and/or sharing what I know. If in the future we can refrain from personal defenses and innuendo I would be glad to resume with the issues at hand. Thank you for understanding if I choose not to respond any further in any other way than this until then.
> Not only do you send invalid DMCA reports, now you go and send invalid > spam reports. > For a spam report, you should send the copy of the spam in it's > entirety. You have invalidated it by changing the links.
> No wonder people laugh at you.
My DMCA requests are and were valid, and I will follow-up all who have broken the law by ignoring them or adding injury to my request. No wonder I defeat all of you so easily. Weren't you taught as a child; cheaters never proper. Not for long anyway.
>> Not only do you send invalid DMCA reports, now you go and send >> invalid spam reports. >> For a spam report, you should send the copy of the spam in it's >> entirety. You have invalidated it by changing the links.
>> No wonder people laugh at you.
> My DMCA requests are and were valid,
Delusion or stupidity? Why not both? Thanks for being a world class kook, Pantyhead!
> and I will follow-up all who have > broken the law by ignoring them or adding injury to my request.
Oh dear, another impotent threat. I'm investing in PF Chang's stock in preparation for the 10th anniversary next April 19th of your best threats that never happened. Got any extra police escorts you can spare for it, Eddieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee?
> No wonder I defeat all of you so easily. Weren't you taught as a > child; cheaters never proper. Not for long anyway.
Nor do plagiarists *prosper*, you illiterate scumbag.
-- Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895. "I haven't been refuted, defeated, or even minimalized yet, I have been called names and attempts have been made to redefine my 50 years of brilliance because of the envy of my lesser harassers, that's all." - 47YO Ed "Pantyhead" Wollmann still can't count.
On Nov 17, 4:07 pm, "Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturian...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> My DMCA requests are and were valid,
Show us some court rulings that actually confirm this, stupid. Until then you're doing precisely what you've *always* done; namely, blow smoke up Usenet's ass in a vain effort to prove it's on fire.
|
