From: noauth <a...@remailer.gabrix.ath.cx> Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software. Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer administrator at <a...@remailer.gabrix.ath.cx>. Cc: mail2n...@dizum.com, mail2n...@m2n.gabrix.ath.cx References:
<393ceba7-7dfd-4599-8695-9abcba75c...@f20g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <Xns9CB79B128DE69c5fe3...@194.177.98.144> <4AF0B758.7...@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Ed Wollmann - World class scumbag Message-ID:
> > > Leave me out of it. TIA I've apologized *my* part. I've received no > > > apology from you nor do I need one. I'd appreciate it if you would > > > LEAVE ME OUT OF IT... It's been...what? a decade since we went > > > out???
There is no one truth, no, not even yours. We all choose experiences and beliefs based on preferences either consciously or unconsciously.
I have reviewed your questions and responses. Much of what you have requested is either easily obtainable information through study at the beginners level, is simply irrelevant, a matter of opinion, or has been answered by me many times in different ways. The posting of this FAQ is evidence that you are obsessed and/or abusive and cannot accept others preferences and beliefs.
Since classes are widely offered on the subject, and texts available that you seem to not be interested in, I can only assume that perhaps you are being disingenuous and your arguments specious. Simply challenging and seeking to create dissention is immature and powerless behavior. Please try to take some responsibility for your lack of effort on the issues at hand and your powerless negative behavior.
Since I am very busy and wish to answer as many of those who are truly interested and not just seeking to tie things up or aggravate because of bias and prejudice, I will have to recommend that you either review the subject on your own with more diligence or seek the information via Google or Deja News retrieval system or some other Usenet search engine. I have dozens of articles and over 100,000 posts (old and new) covering an extremely wide variety of questions relevant to your issues and questions. Everything we are and have is the result of effort.
You have been here (most likely in alt.astrology) arguing against a subject you have no interest in, knowledge of, or preference for, only to derogate and try to belittle persons who prefer to study and discuss their subject of interest and expertise. This is a powerless view and tells us more of you, than those you seek to denigrate.
Anyone with such a defensive and insecure approach to reality and intellectual discussion such as yours, obviously and clearly has nothing to be for and does not understand positive pro-active application and self directed behavior; one who seeks to protect others from themselves for the beliefs you rail against and fear, which is not possible. We cannot be responsible FOR people only to them by being all that we can be in integrity, with sincerity and a sense of service. Response-ability is the ability to respond to one's own creations and defective bias, which you fail to employ. Therefore you are irresponsible. Anyone who has to FORCE their opinion on others obviously does not believe in the power and validity of their own beliefs and what THEY themselves prefer.
"Your saying to me, "I do not understand you," is praise beyond my worth, and an insult you do not deserve." Kahlil Gibran
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing--to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts, not a select party." John Keats
> There is no one truth, no, not even yours. We all choose experiences and > beliefs based on preferences either consciously or unconsciously.
> I have reviewed your questions and responses. Much of what you have > requested is either easily obtainable information through study at the > beginners level, is simply irrelevant, a matter of opinion, or has been > answered by me many times in different ways. The posting of this FAQ is > evidence that you are obsessed and/or abusive and cannot accept others > preferences and beliefs.
> Since classes are widely offered on the subject, and texts available > that you seem to not be interested in, I can only assume that perhaps > you are being disingenuous and your arguments specious. Simply > challenging and seeking to create dissention is immature and powerless > behavior. Please try to take some responsibility for your lack of effort > on the issues at hand and your powerless negative behavior.
> Since I am very busy and wish to answer as many of those who are truly > interested and not just seeking to tie things up or aggravate because of > bias and prejudice, I will have to recommend that you either review the > subject on your own with more diligence or seek the information via > Google or Deja News retrieval system or some other Usenet search engine. > I have dozens of articles and over 100,000 posts (old and new) covering > an extremely wide variety of questions relevant to your issues and > questions. > Everything we are and have is the result of effort.
> You have been here (most likely in alt.astrology) arguing against a > subject you have no interest in, knowledge of, or preference for, only > to derogate and try to belittle persons who prefer to study and discuss > their subject of interest and expertise. This is a powerless view and > tells us more of you, than those you seek to denigrate.
> Anyone with such a defensive and insecure approach to reality and > intellectual discussion such as yours, obviously and clearly has nothing > to be for and does not understand positive pro-active application and > self directed behavior; one who seeks to protect others from themselves > for the beliefs you rail against and fear, which is not possible. We > cannot be responsible FOR people only to them by being all that we can > be in integrity, with sincerity and a sense of service. Response-ability > is the ability to respond to one's own creations and defective bias, > which you fail to employ. > Therefore you are irresponsible. > Anyone who has to FORCE their opinion on others obviously does not > believe in the power and validity of their own beliefs and what THEY > themselves prefer.
> "Your saying to me, "I do not understand you," is praise beyond my > worth, and an insult you do not deserve." Kahlil Gibran
> "The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's > mind about nothing--to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts, > not a select party." John Keats
> -- > Edmond H. Wollmann
I spy a drop of plagarism in the air.
<Quote>
# This is a powerless view and tells us more of you, than those you seek to denigrate. # Response-ability is the ability to respond to one's own creations and defective bias, which you fail to employ. # Anyone with such a defensive and insecure approach to reality and intellectual discussion such as yours, obviously and clearly has nothing to be for and does not understand positive pro-active application and self directed behavior; one who seeks to protect others from themselves for the beliefs you rail against and fear, which is not possible. # Since I am very busy and wish to answer as many of those who are truly interested and not just seeking to tie things up or aggravate because of bias and prejudice, I will have to recommend that you seem to not be interested in, I can only assume that perhaps you are being disingenuous and your arguments specious. # I have reviewed your questions and responses. # Much of what you have no interest in, knowledge of, or preference for, only to them by being all that we can be in integrity, with sincerity and a sense of service. # Response-ability is the ability to respond to one's own creations and defective bias, which you fail to employ. # Therefore you are obsessed and/or abusive and cannot accept others preferences and beliefs. # Therefore you are irresponsible. # Anyone with such a defensive and insecure approach to reality and intellectual discussion such as yours, obviously and clearly has nothing to be for and does not understand positive pro-active application and self directed behavior; one who seeks to protect others from themselves for the beliefs you rail against and fear, which is not possible.
|
